India Fears for Afghanistan after NATO Pullout - Called for Greater Coordination with the United Sta

Lodhi

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

India called for greater coordination with the United States on Afghanistan, voicing fear that Islamic radicals would gain strength once Western forces pull out.

NATO leaders in a May 21 summit in Chicago committed to pulling combat troops out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014 as Western nations grow tired of more than a decade of war and pessimistic on the chances of further progress.
India is one of the most vocal supporters of continued engagement and has given Afghanistan more than $2 billion since the US-led invasion in 2001 overthrew the Taliban regime, which sheltered virulently anti-Indian militants.
Ahead of high-level annual talks between India and the United States on June 13, Nirupama Rao, New Delhi's ambassador to Washington, said the two nations have been holding talks on building "a stable, democratic and prosperous Afghanistan."
"These consultations must be strengthened," Rao said at the Atlantic Council, a think tank.
"We understand that after 10 long years of war there is a manifest and genuine desire to seek an end to conflict. But equally, we must ensure that the enormous sacrifices and efforts of the past decade have not been in vain," she said.
"Given the history of the last few decades in Afghanistan and the tide of extremism and radicalism that has swept across that country to the great detriment of its men, women and children, one cannot but help be concerned about what the future holds for that country" after the NATO pullout, she said.
India's involvement in Afghanistan has enraged neighboring Pakistan, which helped create the Taliban regime and accuses its historic rival of seeking to encircle it.
The United States partnered with Pakistan after the September 11, 2001 attacks. But relations have plummeted, with US concerns about Pakistan's orientation soaring after US forces found and killed Osama bin Laden near the country's main military academy last year.
The United States has welcomed India's contributions in Afghanistan but some US policymakers believe that Pakistani intelligence has maintained links to Islamic extremists due to a fixation on New Delhi's influence.
Yashwant Sinha, a lawmaker from India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party, was blunter about fears on Afghanistan during a separate appearance in Washington at the Brookings Institution.
"I have great fears that Pakistan, for its own geopolitical reasons, might want to encourage Taliban to again take over Afghanistan," said Sinha, who served as foreign and finance minister when his right-leaning party was in power from 1998 to 2004.
Sinha said Afghanistan lacked a sufficient military -- or an anti-Taliban force, such as the Northern Alliance which enjoyed Indian, Iranian and Russian support before the war -- to withstand an assault.
"I don't see any local resistance building up immediately if the Taliban were to attempt to overrun Afghanistan," Sinha said.
"NATO has to stay the course in Afghanistan until we are absolutely confident that the Afghan army and the armed forces of Afghanistan are in a position to meet the Taliban threat," he said.
But opinion polls show that a majority of Americans want to end their country's longest war, with many US policymakers concluding that it is unrealistic to eliminate the Taliban through force.
US President Barack Obama and other Western leaders have vowed to support Afghanistan through military training and other assistance after the pullout of combat troops.
Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna will travel to Washington for the June 13 annual dialogue, which is part of efforts by the world's two largest democracies to build closer relations.
India and the United States recently had a rift as Washington urged the import-dependent emerging economy to cut oil imports from Iran as a way to pressure Tehran over its contested nuclear program.
Despite initial unease, India has reduced Iranian imports. The United States is expected to announce in the coming weeks that it will exempt New Delhi from sanctions under a new law that punishes countries that do business with Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/india-fears-afghanistan-nato-pullout-013621759.html
 

Imranpak

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The USA can remain in Afghanistan for another decade but that will not improve the Afghani armed forces or eliminate the Taliban who will return one way or the other. India is rightfully frightened but is helpless as Pakistan is holding all the trump cards, without NATO/USA supplies being resumed they have no other choice but to leave or be killed.

Pakistan is rightfully looking after it's own interests wanting a pro-Pakistani government in Afghanistan after the occupiers leave where as India is not even a direct neighbour so should stop crying foul play.
 

Saadbaloch

Senator (1k+ posts)
India = Toon kon ? Main Kham-khawa

Inn ko apney 900 Million Bhookey Nangon ki Fikar karni chahiye aor yeh American Policeman bananey k khawab dekh rahey hain Asia main... lol
 

xzhamayu

Voter (50+ posts)
Future Afghanistan and the key power players.

A topic that is rather rarely discussed is Afghanistan and the dilemma that every power player in Afghanistan faces. As of yet the way I see it is that Washington is divided into three factions:
1. White house (including republicans and democrats along with the support the general public)
2. The pentagon along with the indian and Israeli lobbyist
3. The military and the defense contractors.

Now the white house wants to pull out of Afghanistan asap as Obama's new term has begun with new promises. Obama wants to divert country's resources towards its internal problems rather than spending colossal amounts of money on un winnable wars.
However the pentagon and the lobbies do not want that. They want to ensure a rather slow withdrawal so that the indian and israeli lobbyist can install a proxy government in afghanistan which will do three primary things. The first and foremost reason would be keeping Iran under their close watch and perhaps even using afghanistan as a platform in waging a very possible war against Iran. The second most important reason would be encircling Pakistan and continuing to support the insurgency in Baluchistan without any hinderance. The third and perhaps the least important of the three reasons would be to try and pin down growing Chinese influence in afghanistan as well as in other neighbouring regions.
Lastly the military and the defense contractors want this war to continue bcuz as soon as the troops are withdrawn obama is most likely to cut the defence spending to divert the money on internal affairs and that is adversary to what the defence contractors and the military wants.

The best option for Pakistan is obviously for usa to withdraw asap. What do u guys think?