crankthskunk
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
First point he raised is that were the PTI members entitled to speak to the house?
He said the Speaker shouldn't have allowed to speak to the assembly. He says if this was legal act to allow them to addressed the assembly.
I can give my comments to his questions.
Well, you defeat crooks with their own scheming. So let's recount. PTI resigned from the Parliament. But even yesterday the Speaker said he is not going to accept their resignations until he speaks to the members and find out that they have resigned from the assembly on their own wills.
After speakers public comments, the PTI members are entitled to attend and deliver their message.
He said the Speaker shouldn't have allowed to speak to the assembly. He says if this was legal act to allow them to addressed the assembly.
I can give my comments to his questions.
Well, you defeat crooks with their own scheming. So let's recount. PTI resigned from the Parliament. But even yesterday the Speaker said he is not going to accept their resignations until he speaks to the members and find out that they have resigned from the assembly on their own wills.
After speakers public comments, the PTI members are entitled to attend and deliver their message.