LONDON: British magazine The Economist has on Friday written that despite being the biggest importer of weaponry, India still lacks the brain to fight a war.
According to The Economist, Indias land, air and naval forces lack communication. It added that most of Indias firepower looks great only on the paper. It added that though with 2000 aircrafts Indian air force is the 4th largest of the world, only 60% of its jets are able to fly.
The magazine also noted that a naval fleet under construction for the last 15 years is still under construction.
It said that the fleet must have been completed and delivered to the Indian army by 2010 but its construction has been delayed till 2023.
It added that the experts were surprised at how frequently the terrorists are able to break into Indian airbases and also highlighted the role of corruption in the Indian army.
Here's what The Economists' Article said
But there is another, less obvious reason for reticence.
India is not as strong militarily as the numbers might suggest. Puzzlingly, given how its international ambitions are growing along with its economy, and how alarming its strategic position looks, India has proved strangely unable to build serious military muscle.
Indias armed forces look good on paper. It fields the worlds second-biggest standing army, after China, with long fighting experience in a variety of terrains and situations (see chart).
It has topped the list of global arms importers since 2010, sucking in a formidable array of top-of-the-line weaponry, including Russian warplanes, Israeli missiles, American transport aircraft and French submarines. State-owned Indian firms churn out some impressive gear, too, including fighter jets, cruise missiles and the 40,000-tonne aircraft-carrier under construction in a shipyard in Kochi, in the south of the country.
Yet there are serious chinks in Indias armour. Much of its weaponry is, in fact, outdated or ill maintained. Our air defence is in a shocking state, says Ajai Shukla, a commentator on military affairs. Whats in place is mostly 1970s vintage, and it may take ten years to install the fancy new gear. On paper, Indias air force is the worlds fourth largest, with around 2,000 aircraft in service.
But an internal report seen in 2014 by IHS Janes, a defence publication, revealed that only 60% were typically fit to fly. A report earlier this year by a government accounting agency estimated that the serviceability of the 45 MiG 29K jets that are the pride of the Indian navys air arm ranged between 16% and 38%. They were intended to fly from the carrier currently under construction, which was ordered more than 15 years ago and was meant to have been launched in 2010. According to the governments auditors the ship, after some 1,150 modifications, now looks unlikely to sail before 2023.
Such delays are far from unusual. Indias army, for instance, has been seeking a new standard assault rifle since 1982; torn between demands for local production and the temptation of fancy imports, and between doctrines calling for heavier firepower or more versatility, it has flip-flopped ever since. Indias air force has spent 16 years perusing fighter aircraft to replace ageing Soviet-era models. By demanding over-ambitious specifications, bargain prices, hard-to-meet local-content quotas and so on, it has left foreign manufacturers banging heads against the wall, in the words of one Indian military analyst. Four years ago France appeared to have clinched a deal to sell 126 of its Rafale fighters. The order has since been whittled to 36, but is at least about to be finalised.
Indias military is also scandal-prone. Corruption has been a problem in the past, and observers rightly wonder how guerrillas manage to penetrate heavily guarded bases repeatedly. Lately the Indian public has been treated to legal battles between generals over promotions, loud disputes over pay and orders for officers to lose weight. In July a military transport plane vanished into the Bay of Bengal with 29 people aboard; no trace of it has been found. In August an Australian newspaper leaked extensive technical details of Indias new French submarines.
The deeper problem with Indias military is structural. The three services are each reasonably competent, say security experts; the trouble is that they function as separate fiefdoms. No service talks to the others, and the civilians in the Ministry of Defence dont talk to them, says Mr Shukla. Bizarrely, there are no military men inside the ministry at all. Like Indias other ministries, defence is run by rotating civil servants and political appointees more focused on ballot boxes than ballistics. They seem to think a general practitioner can perform surgery, says Abhijit Iyer-Mitra, who has worked as a consultant for the ministry. Despite their growing brawn, Indias armed forces still lack a brain
Source : The Economist Indias armed forces Guns and ghee
