- Featured Thumbs
- http://adoption.state.gov/content/images/flags/belgium_flag.gif
Belgium says security concerns deter investors
- Thread starter the.paki
- Start date
Mullah Omar
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
Man why do you have so much hatred for our security forces?
Man why do you have so much hatred for our security forces?
Unicorn
Banned
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
I don't understand why you are dumping on the thread starter, its not like he is making it all up. He posted a news item. I thought you were pro-jobs.
I don't understand why you are dumping on the thread starter, its not like he is making it all up. He posted a news item. I thought you were pro-jobs.
Mullah Omar
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
I don't have any problem with the news but why add "No one trust Pakistani security forces" in the thread title?
Unicorn
Banned
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
Oh, I see. I got your point come to think of it the heading is a bit misleading.
Oh, I see. I got your point come to think of it the heading is a bit misleading.
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
forces kaa pasand nahi yaa takleef daita hoga
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
so who do you think is responsible for security of Pakistan ?
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
yaar jinko yeh nahi Pakistan kese likhna hai unki security forces se kya matlab hoga
yaar jinko yeh nahi Pakistan kese likhna hai unki security forces se kya matlab hoga
xzhamayu
Voter (50+ posts)
Yea right it is bcuz of Pakistani security forces that we have not been bombed by israelis (just look at palestine) and indians. Just because u dont understand their agenda doesnt mean they are feeble. U seriously dont expect ISI to unveil its plans on public forums who knows what they are planning. The reason why usa has not been able to win the afghan war and bring 'democracy' to afghanistan is bcuz ISI did not want it too. We r stronger than u would like to think.
Mullah Omar
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
The government
xzhamayu
Voter (50+ posts)
Look at india and their defence spending and look at Pakistan and its defence spending. Regardless of the grave differences in our defence budget we still maintain a larger nuclear stockpile along with more sophisticated technology. Just wait till nato withdrawal winds will start blowing in our favor. Wo bicharai Palestinians bhi to hain jin ko ai din israeli shaheed kr daitai hain, likn wo abhi tak lar rahai hain. Jub Pakistan first muslim nation bna tha to sarai muslim nations nai Pakistan Zindabad Ka nara lgaya tha. We must stay united aj burai din hain to kal achai din bhi ain gai.
xzhamayu
Voter (50+ posts)
Read this article I wrote after my detailed research.
A topic that is rather rarely discussed is Afghanistan and the dilemma that every power player in Afghanistan faces. As of yet the way I see it is that Washington is divided into three factions:
1. White house (including republicans and democrats along with the support the general public)
2. The pentagon along with the indian and Israeli lobbyist
3. The military and the defense contractors. Now the white house wants to pull out of Afghanistan asap as Obama's new term has begun with new promises. Obama wants to divert country's resources towards its internal problems rather than spending colossal amounts of money on un winnable wars.
However the pentagon and the lobbies do not want that. They want to ensure a rather slow withdrawal so that the indian and israeli lobbyist can install a proxy government in afghanistan which will do three primary things. The first and foremost reason would be keeping Iran under their close watch and perhaps even using afghanistan as a platform in waging a very possible war against Iran. The second most important reason would be encircling Pakistan and continuing to support the insurgency in Baluchistan without any hinderance. The third and perhaps the least important of the three reasons would be to try and pin down growing Chinese influence in afghanistan as well as in other neighbouring regions.
Lastly the military and the defense contractors want this war to continue bcuz as soon as the troops are withdrawn obama is most likely to cut the defence spending to divert the money on internal affairs and that is adversary to what the defence contractors and the military wants. The best option for Pakistan is obviously for usa to withdraw asap. Pakistan should take every advantage of this grand poker game as it holds the royal flush in its hand.
A topic that is rather rarely discussed is Afghanistan and the dilemma that every power player in Afghanistan faces. As of yet the way I see it is that Washington is divided into three factions:
1. White house (including republicans and democrats along with the support the general public)
2. The pentagon along with the indian and Israeli lobbyist
3. The military and the defense contractors. Now the white house wants to pull out of Afghanistan asap as Obama's new term has begun with new promises. Obama wants to divert country's resources towards its internal problems rather than spending colossal amounts of money on un winnable wars.
However the pentagon and the lobbies do not want that. They want to ensure a rather slow withdrawal so that the indian and israeli lobbyist can install a proxy government in afghanistan which will do three primary things. The first and foremost reason would be keeping Iran under their close watch and perhaps even using afghanistan as a platform in waging a very possible war against Iran. The second most important reason would be encircling Pakistan and continuing to support the insurgency in Baluchistan without any hinderance. The third and perhaps the least important of the three reasons would be to try and pin down growing Chinese influence in afghanistan as well as in other neighbouring regions.
Lastly the military and the defense contractors want this war to continue bcuz as soon as the troops are withdrawn obama is most likely to cut the defence spending to divert the money on internal affairs and that is adversary to what the defence contractors and the military wants. The best option for Pakistan is obviously for usa to withdraw asap. Pakistan should take every advantage of this grand poker game as it holds the royal flush in its hand.
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
WAPDA chairman is not responsible for loadshedding and so on...
govt. is responsibke for bad performance of cricket team as well
so its mean chairman PIA is not responsible for PIA failure
WAPDA chairman is not responsible for loadshedding and so on...
govt. is responsibke for bad performance of cricket team as well
Mullah Omar
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
Who appoints chairman PIA etc?
Who appoints chairman PIA etc?
sarbakaf
Siasat.pk - Blogger
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
Dear PAKI
what every you try you can not harm our love for our nation and our security forces
secondly go and play with your puppys like unicorn and khanpanni what ever....
we nation loving pakistans are too good for you , and id-iots like you and panni need good battering ;)
Dear PAKI
what every you try you can not harm our love for our nation and our security forces
secondly go and play with your puppys like unicorn and khanpanni what ever....
we nation loving pakistans are too good for you , and id-iots like you and panni need good battering ;)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
ofcourse govt. but it doesnot mean that chairman PIA, chairman wapda and army chief don't have their own responsibilities
Mullah Omar
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
The primary responsibility of the army is to defend from external threats and not to maintain internal law and order.
The primary responsibility of the army is to defend from external threats and not to maintain internal law and order.
Wadaich
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Re: No one trust Pakistani security forces. Belgium says security concerns deter investors
A humble opinion on responding to the mentally challenged people suffering from Army/ISI phobia:
A humble opinion on responding to the mentally challenged people suffering from Army/ISI phobia:
"Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
