ANOTHER LIE OF MQM Dr. ABDUL SATTAR meeting With Musharraf
- Thread starter mazharjp
- Start date
shaheedchoudry
Minister (2k+ posts)
WHY DO YOU QUESTION THAT? ITS POSSIBLE. THEIR ROOTS ARE SAME. REMEMBER "MUNEEM TABQA OF INDIA".?mazharjp said:
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
shaheedchoudry said:WHY DO YOU QUESTION THAT? ITS POSSIBLE. THEIR ROOTS ARE SAME. REMEMBER "MUNEEM TABQA OF INDIA".?mazharjp said:
I bet you MQM will defend the dictator. They are discussing the strategies how to fight off Pakistan Supreme Court. I like them to come to the people of Pakistan and declare the Musharraf innocent for his 3rd Novemeber action of declaring the emergency. And they should do that openly instead of covertly meeting with him. They benefitted from Musharraf's power and they should come clean and defend their protector. This is the time to pay back thugs.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
shaheedchoudry said:WHY DO YOU QUESTION THAT? ITS POSSIBLE. THEIR ROOTS ARE SAME. REMEMBER "MUNEEM TABQA OF INDIA".?mazharjp said:
Choudry:
Hosh ke nakhun lo, Jahil.
Is tabqey ne tumhein Pakistan diya, or tum ne Pakistan ka satiyanas kerdiya. AHSAN FRAMOSH.
Mein bhi tumhein Raja Ranjeet Singh ki aulad keh sakta hoon, lakin aiasa nahi karoon ga kyun ke Raja Ranjeet Singh ki doosri JAIZ auladeiN bura maney gi.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
CAN ANYONE PLEASE PROVIDE THE AUTHENTIC SOURCE OF THE NEWS OF THIS MEETING, OR EVERYBODY HAS JUST STARTED ABUSING BASED ON SOMEONE'S WRONG INFORMATION.
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
PakPatriot1 said:
You mean Gutter press ??? where is Jury , your best friend ? Only because, the Sattar( toda) likes to meet Musharraf in Purda, this must have been a mischevious media who dare to barged in ... Right ? Call it Gutter press since it is not something MQM wants people to know. How many times you guys wants to be wrong ?
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
Zaidi Qasim said:
Zaidi:
First, Whatever you said is rubbish until proven. If you prove it I will be with you.
Second, even Farooq Sattar did meet with Musharaf, what is wrong in it?
If BB can meet with Musharaf and signed an NRO,
if Nawaz Sharif can signed a hidden agreement with the same Musharaf to flee from the country,
if Choudhary brothers, Sheikh Rasheed, Ejaz - ul - Haque, Faisal Saleh Hayat,the whole MMA (that includes Jamat - e- Islami and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, ) and Imran Khan can empower Musharaf with their full and unconditional support ,
If supreme court of Pakistan (the present CJ was a member of that SC panel) endorse the legitimacy of Musharaf coupe in 1999,
then who is Farooq Sattar?If you compare him with these giants in pk politics Farooq Sattar is a baby chicken?
Look like all of the above were dealing and meeting with Musharaf for their own personal benefits and interests. Now most of them are against him.
Correct me if they were not doing all those crimes.
I am not twisting the topic, my reply is within the domain of the topic in discussion.
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
You mean Gutter press ??? where is Jury , your best friend ? Only because, the Sattar( toda) likes to meet Musharraf in Purda, this must have been a mischevious media who dare to barged in ... Right ? Call it Gutter press since it is not something MQM wants people to know. How many times you guys wants to be wrong ?[/quote]
Zaidi:
First, Whatever you said is rubbish until proven. If you prove it I will be with you.
Second, even Farooq Sattar did meet with Musharaf, what is wrong in it?
If BB can meet with Musharaf and signed an NRO,
if Nawaz Sharif can signed a hidden agreement with the same Musharaf to flee from the country,
if Choudhary brothers, Sheikh Rasheed, Ejaz - ul - Haque, Faisal Saleh Hayat,the whole MMA (that includes Jamat - e- Islami and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, ) and Imran Khan can empower Musharaf with their full and unconditional support ,
If supreme court of Pakistan (the present CJ was a member of that SC panel) endorse the legitimacy of Musharaf coupe in 1999,
then who is Farooq Sattar?If you compare him with these giants in pk politics Farooq Sattar is a baby chicken?
Look like all of the above were dealing and meeting with Musharaf for their own personal benefits and interests. Now most of them are against him.
Correct me if they were not doing all those crimes.
I am not twisting the topic, my reply is within the domain of the topic in discussion.[/quote]
Typical MQM answer !!!! what if sattar meeting with Musharraf ? My friend, why don't you admit you still like Musharraf. Who is Sattar if supreme court allowed Musharraf in 1999... My naive friend, Musharraf's act of 3rd November was imposing Marshal Law under the disguise of Emergency... And MQM and its leaders never protested this autocratic act of Musharraf....As a matter of fact, they provided him the full support during his emergency. MQM was also responsible for unjust prison of Iftikhar Choudry and his family including his kids in his house. You guy have no shame whatsoever. The CJ of pakistan was in virtual hosue arrest with his family and HAQ parast could not utter a word in his support. What kind of hypocrates are you ???? Now , if you guys wants to support him, you should come up front and declared him innocent as I said in my early posting. Have some shame guys.
Zaidi:
First, Whatever you said is rubbish until proven. If you prove it I will be with you.
Second, even Farooq Sattar did meet with Musharaf, what is wrong in it?
If BB can meet with Musharaf and signed an NRO,
if Nawaz Sharif can signed a hidden agreement with the same Musharaf to flee from the country,
if Choudhary brothers, Sheikh Rasheed, Ejaz - ul - Haque, Faisal Saleh Hayat,the whole MMA (that includes Jamat - e- Islami and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, ) and Imran Khan can empower Musharaf with their full and unconditional support ,
If supreme court of Pakistan (the present CJ was a member of that SC panel) endorse the legitimacy of Musharaf coupe in 1999,
then who is Farooq Sattar?If you compare him with these giants in pk politics Farooq Sattar is a baby chicken?
Look like all of the above were dealing and meeting with Musharaf for their own personal benefits and interests. Now most of them are against him.
Correct me if they were not doing all those crimes.
I am not twisting the topic, my reply is within the domain of the topic in discussion.[/quote]
Typical MQM answer !!!! what if sattar meeting with Musharraf ? My friend, why don't you admit you still like Musharraf. Who is Sattar if supreme court allowed Musharraf in 1999... My naive friend, Musharraf's act of 3rd November was imposing Marshal Law under the disguise of Emergency... And MQM and its leaders never protested this autocratic act of Musharraf....As a matter of fact, they provided him the full support during his emergency. MQM was also responsible for unjust prison of Iftikhar Choudry and his family including his kids in his house. You guy have no shame whatsoever. The CJ of pakistan was in virtual hosue arrest with his family and HAQ parast could not utter a word in his support. What kind of hypocrates are you ???? Now , if you guys wants to support him, you should come up front and declared him innocent as I said in my early posting. Have some shame guys.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
Zaidi Qasim said:
Zaidi:
First, Whatever you said is rubbish until proven. If you prove it I will be with you.
Second, even Farooq Sattar did meet with Musharaf, what is wrong in it?
If BB can meet with Musharaf and signed an NRO,
if Nawaz Sharif can signed a hidden agreement with the same Musharaf to flee from the country,
if Choudhary brothers, Sheikh Rasheed, Ejaz - ul - Haque, Faisal Saleh Hayat,the whole MMA (that includes Jamat - e- Islami and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, ) and Imran Khan can empower Musharaf with their full and unconditional support ,
If supreme court of Pakistan (the present CJ was a member of that SC panel) endorse the legitimacy of Musharaf coupe in 1999,
then who is Farooq Sattar?If you compare him with these giants in pk politics Farooq Sattar is a baby chicken?
Look like all of the above were dealing and meeting with Musharaf for their own personal benefits and interests. Now most of them are against him.
Correct me if they were not doing all those crimes.
I am not twisting the topic, my reply is within the domain of the topic in discussion.[/quote]
Typical MQM answer !!!! what if sattar meeting with Musharraf ? My friend, why don't you admit you still like Musharraf. Who is Sattar if supreme court allowed Musharraf in 1999... My naive friend, Musharraf's act of 3rd November was imposing Marshal Law under the disguise of Emergency... And MQM and its leaders never protested this autocratic act of Musharraf....As a matter of fact, they provided him the full support during his emergency. MQM was also responsible for unjust prison of Iftikhar Choudry and his family including his kids in his house. You guy have no shame whatsoever. The CJ of pakistan was in virtual hosue arrest with his family and HAQ parast could not utter a word in his support. What kind of hypocrates are you ???? Now , if you guys wants to support him, you should come up front and declared him innocent as I said in my early posting. Have some shame guys.[/quote]
@Zaidi:
Instead of calling someone hypocrate and remind him the shame, you should also look at you again. You are pointing one finger towards MQM but your other fours fingures are pointing to you my Bholley Sajjan.
In your posting your are emphasizing only the incident of November 03, 2007 and after, right? Means everything before that was ok for you? Please explain.
On the other hand I am pointing out the criminal acts of everyone who was supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator from October 12, 1999 till today.
Why do you want to save all those criminals? because they are sons of the soils and your paitybund Bhais? If MQM committed any crime then everyone did bigger crimes than MQM. Bring every body to justice if you have any in Pakistan.
Don't single out MQM in this dirty game, MQM is still a very tiny part of this system.
CATCH ALL THE BIG FISH FIRST THEN BLAME MQM MY DEAR.
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Typical MQM answer !!!! what if sattar meeting with Musharraf ? My friend, why don't you admit you still like Musharraf. Who is Sattar if supreme court allowed Musharraf in 1999... My naive friend, Musharraf's act of 3rd November was imposing Marshal Law under the disguise of Emergency... And MQM and its leaders never protested this autocratic act of Musharraf....As a matter of fact, they provided him the full support during his emergency. MQM was also responsible for unjust prison of Iftikhar Choudry and his family including his kids in his house. You guy have no shame whatsoever. The CJ of pakistan was in virtual hosue arrest with his family and HAQ parast could not utter a word in his support. What kind of hypocrates are you ???? Now , if you guys wants to support him, you should come up front and declared him innocent as I said in my early posting. Have some shame guys.[/quote]
@Zaidi:
Instead of calling someone hypocrate and remind him the shame, you should also look at you again. You are pointing one finger towards MQM but your other fours fingures are pointing to you my Bholley Sajjan.
In your posting your are emphasizing only the incident of November 03, 2007 and after, right? Means everything before that was ok for you? Please explain.
On the other hand I am pointing out the criminal acts of everyone who was supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator from October 12, 1999 till today.
Why do you want to save all those criminals? because they are sons of the soils and your paitybund Bhais? If MQM committed any crime then everyone did bigger crimes than MQM. Bring every body to justice if you have any in Pakistan.
Don't single out MQM in this dirty game, MQM is still a very tiny part of this system.
CATCH ALL THE BIG FISH FIRST THEN BLAME MQM MY DEAR.[/quote]
Yeah, the only MQM and Sher Afgan still like MUsharraf........That is the difference. They all agree that Musharraf's action of 3rd November particular and the others in general were against the constitution of Pakistan...... While , The MQM still trying to defend the dictator. And All I am saying that you own him now. Come clean and say that he is innocent and defend him and his past actions in Supreme Court.
@Zaidi:
Instead of calling someone hypocrate and remind him the shame, you should also look at you again. You are pointing one finger towards MQM but your other fours fingures are pointing to you my Bholley Sajjan.
In your posting your are emphasizing only the incident of November 03, 2007 and after, right? Means everything before that was ok for you? Please explain.
On the other hand I am pointing out the criminal acts of everyone who was supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator from October 12, 1999 till today.
Why do you want to save all those criminals? because they are sons of the soils and your paitybund Bhais? If MQM committed any crime then everyone did bigger crimes than MQM. Bring every body to justice if you have any in Pakistan.
Don't single out MQM in this dirty game, MQM is still a very tiny part of this system.
CATCH ALL THE BIG FISH FIRST THEN BLAME MQM MY DEAR.[/quote]
Yeah, the only MQM and Sher Afgan still like MUsharraf........That is the difference. They all agree that Musharraf's action of 3rd November particular and the others in general were against the constitution of Pakistan...... While , The MQM still trying to defend the dictator. And All I am saying that you own him now. Come clean and say that he is innocent and defend him and his past actions in Supreme Court.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
Zaidi Qasim said:
@Zaidi:
Instead of calling someone hypocrate and remind him the shame, you should also look at you again. You are pointing one finger towards MQM but your other fours fingures are pointing to you my Bholley Sajjan.
In your posting your are emphasizing only the incident of November 03, 2007 and after, right? Means everything before that was ok for you? Please explain.
On the other hand I am pointing out the criminal acts of everyone who was supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator from October 12, 1999 till today.
Why do you want to save all those criminals? because they are sons of the soils and your paitybund Bhais? If MQM committed any crime then everyone did bigger crimes than MQM. Bring every body to justice if you have any in Pakistan.
Don't single out MQM in this dirty game, MQM is still a very tiny part of this system.
CATCH ALL THE BIG FISH FIRST THEN BLAME MQM MY DEAR.[/quote]
Yeah, the only MQM and Sher Afgan still like MUsharraf........That is the difference. They all agree that Musharraf's action of 3rd November particular and the others in general were against the constitution of Pakistan...... While , The MQM still trying to defend the dictator. And All I am saying that you own him now. Come clean and say that he is innocent and defend him and his past actions in Supreme Court.[/quote]
Zaidi:
You never went to a good education. A very small thing you are not able to understand when you are saying that:
Before November 03, 2007, all of those goons were busy in supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator. They set the constitution of Pakistan on fire because of their own personal interests.
and then they suddenly woke up with the love of the constitution after November 03, 2007 becuase all their goals were accomplished by that time.
MQM supported him because first time in the history of Pakistan, Musharaf recognised the reality of Urban Sindh. He gave chance to the representatives of Karachi and Hyderabad to do all the development works. He did not stop the Karachi funds instead, he personally monitored all of the progress in Karachi.
That's the difference between MQM and others. MQM supported him because of Pakistan's interest (Karachi's development is a Pakistan's dvelopment) and others supported him because of their own interests.
I don't know about MQM's leadership's stand so far, but I am 100% sure that most of the karachi people love Musharaf and they are very true on that. He can alone win NA election in Karachi even without the support of MQM.
shaheedchoudry
Minister (2k+ posts)
WHO STARTED ABUSING? ASK YOUR SELF IF YOU HAVE "ZAMEER", WHICH I DOUBT.PakPatriot1 said:
'
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Yeah, the only MQM and Sher Afgan still like MUsharraf........That is the difference. They all agree that Musharraf's action of 3rd November particular and the others in general were against the constitution of Pakistan...... While , The MQM still trying to defend the dictator. And All I am saying that you own him now. Come clean and say that he is innocent and defend him and his past actions in Supreme Court.[/quote]
Zaidi:
You never went to a good education. A very small thing you are not able to understand when you are saying that:
and then they suddenly woke up with the love of the constitution after November 03, 2007 becuase all their goals were accomplished by that time.
MQM supported him because first time in the history of Pakistan, Musharaf recognised the reality of Urban Sindh. He gave chance to the representatives of Karachi and Hyderabad to do all the development works. He did not stop the Karachi funds instead, he personally monitored all of the progress in Karachi.
That's the difference between MQM and others. MQM supported him because of Pakistan's interest (Karachi's development is a Pakistan's dvelopment) and others supported him because of their own
Pakpatriot:
A regional interest is more important than the national interest . Is that what you want to say ? Pakistan Constitution is less important than the money a dictator can provide MQM to spend on their vote bank ... Is that what you want to say ? You know ,I don't even want to debate with someone who put forward that kinds of argument to justify their support for a dictator.You still missing a point my friend. you also seem unsure what is the stance of your pir in london shariff regarding Musharraf's defense.Wait for few days, watch the direction of the wind blowing, and then get on the band wagon. After all this is precisely what opportunists of MQM are famous for .
Zaidi:
You never went to a good education. A very small thing you are not able to understand when you are saying that:
Before November 03, 2007, all of those goons were busy in supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator. They set the constitution of Pakistan on fire because of their own personal interests.
and then they suddenly woke up with the love of the constitution after November 03, 2007 becuase all their goals were accomplished by that time.
MQM supported him because first time in the history of Pakistan, Musharaf recognised the reality of Urban Sindh. He gave chance to the representatives of Karachi and Hyderabad to do all the development works. He did not stop the Karachi funds instead, he personally monitored all of the progress in Karachi.
That's the difference between MQM and others. MQM supported him because of Pakistan's interest (Karachi's development is a Pakistan's dvelopment) and others supported him because of their own
Pakpatriot:
A regional interest is more important than the national interest . Is that what you want to say ? Pakistan Constitution is less important than the money a dictator can provide MQM to spend on their vote bank ... Is that what you want to say ? You know ,I don't even want to debate with someone who put forward that kinds of argument to justify their support for a dictator.You still missing a point my friend. you also seem unsure what is the stance of your pir in london shariff regarding Musharraf's defense.Wait for few days, watch the direction of the wind blowing, and then get on the band wagon. After all this is precisely what opportunists of MQM are famous for .
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
Zaidi Qasim said:
Zaidi:
You never went to a good education. A very small thing you are not able to understand when you are saying that:
Before November 03, 2007, all of those goons were busy in supporting, meeting, dealing, and endorsing the dictator. They set the constitution of Pakistan on fire because of their own personal interests.
and then they suddenly woke up with the love of the constitution after November 03, 2007 becuase all their goals were accomplished by that time.
MQM supported him because first time in the history of Pakistan, Musharaf recognised the reality of Urban Sindh. He gave chance to the representatives of Karachi and Hyderabad to do all the development works. He did not stop the Karachi funds instead, he personally monitored all of the progress in Karachi.
That's the difference between MQM and others. MQM supported him because of Pakistan's interest (Karachi's development is a Pakistan's dvelopment) and others supported him because of their own
Pakpatriot:
A regional interest is more important than the national interest . Is that what you want to say ? Pakistan Constitution is less important than the money a dictator can provide MQM to spend on their vote bank ... Is that what you want to say ? You know ,I don't even want to debate with someone who put forward that kinds of argument to justify their support for a dictator.You still missing a point my friend. you also seem unsure what is the stance of your pir in london shariff regarding Musharraf's defense.Wait for few days, watch the direction of the wind blowing, and then get on the band wagon. After all this is precisely what opportunists of MQM are famous for .[/quote]
Zaidi:
Why you are trying to regionalize Karachi's developments. In one hand you say Karachi is a mini Pakistan and on the other hand you say the development in Karachi is a regional issue. What a stupid logic you have.Who stops other politicians to do the developments in their areas?
Why you are upset if Karachi is being developed? You were very much happy when this orphan city was not getting any attention from all of your beloved goon politicians. They were just making money and looting this city and you were sleeping?
I am still asking why you are stressing only on November 03, 2007 and after? Why you are not considering anything before that? You don't have answer of that. Was Musharaf a legitimate ruler before that? Oh yes, your CJ gave him legitimacy, sorry I forgot. So, whoever met with him, dealt with him and supported him was doing according to the constitution of Pakistan. Yes? or No?
I don't make policies of MQM. Leadership will decide what to do , but for sure I am confident they will go according to the will of their supporters.
If they still support Musharaf then it will be taken a right decission from most people of Karachi and Hyderabad.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
shaheedchoudry said:
It was you not me. Look at this what you wrote:
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Zaidi:
Why you are trying to regionalize Karachi's developments. In one hand you say Karachi is a mini Pakistan and on the other hand you say the development in Karachi is a regional issue. What a stupid logic you have.Who stops other politicians to do the developments in their areas?
Why you are upset if Karachi is being developed? You were very much happy when this orphan city was not getting any attention from all of your beloved goon politicians. They were just making money and looting this city and you were sleeping?
I am still asking why you are stressing only on November 03, 2007 and after? Why you are not considering anything before that? You don't have answer of that. Was Musharaf a legitimate ruler before that? Oh yes, your CJ gave him legitimacy, sorry I forgot. So, whoever met with him, dealt with him and supported him was doing according to the constitution of Pakistan. Yes? or No?
I don't make policies of MQM. Leadership will decide what to do , but for sure I am confident they will go according to the will of their supporters.
Pakpatriot:
Are you playing dum here ? My question is staright forward. That by supporting Musharraf, MQM wanted to get some money for Karachi ,and according to you, thats why MQM supported Musharraf . Is that right or not ? And if that is right, you admitting that in order to get money for Karachi,if MQM had to support a dictator , they will do that. My point is nothing against Karachi development ... And anyone with peanut brain will understand it....I am looking in to the view point of a party which when the time is right will even kiss the ass of any General( no morals here) to get the advantage and will not regard the national interest by doing that.....Musharraf was a dictator and MQM supported that dictator from the day one.If you guys have any moral uprights ,you wouldn't feel so proud of supporting a dictator and now trying to make lame excuses.As I said, yours is a party of opportunists and fasicts.You will make a decision by checking the direction of wind.
Why you are trying to regionalize Karachi's developments. In one hand you say Karachi is a mini Pakistan and on the other hand you say the development in Karachi is a regional issue. What a stupid logic you have.Who stops other politicians to do the developments in their areas?
Why you are upset if Karachi is being developed? You were very much happy when this orphan city was not getting any attention from all of your beloved goon politicians. They were just making money and looting this city and you were sleeping?
I am still asking why you are stressing only on November 03, 2007 and after? Why you are not considering anything before that? You don't have answer of that. Was Musharaf a legitimate ruler before that? Oh yes, your CJ gave him legitimacy, sorry I forgot. So, whoever met with him, dealt with him and supported him was doing according to the constitution of Pakistan. Yes? or No?
I don't make policies of MQM. Leadership will decide what to do , but for sure I am confident they will go according to the will of their supporters.
Pakpatriot:
Are you playing dum here ? My question is staright forward. That by supporting Musharraf, MQM wanted to get some money for Karachi ,and according to you, thats why MQM supported Musharraf . Is that right or not ? And if that is right, you admitting that in order to get money for Karachi,if MQM had to support a dictator , they will do that. My point is nothing against Karachi development ... And anyone with peanut brain will understand it....I am looking in to the view point of a party which when the time is right will even kiss the ass of any General( no morals here) to get the advantage and will not regard the national interest by doing that.....Musharraf was a dictator and MQM supported that dictator from the day one.If you guys have any moral uprights ,you wouldn't feel so proud of supporting a dictator and now trying to make lame excuses.As I said, yours is a party of opportunists and fasicts.You will make a decision by checking the direction of wind.
PakPatriot1
Senator (1k+ posts)
Zaidi Qasim said:
Yes, indeed, in order to get money for Karachi MQM supported a dictator. You know why? because your beloved elected politicians were not ready to give any penny to Karachi - rather they were imosing army operations and killing extra judicially the youth of Karachi. To get money from a dictator just to bring some decency to the lives of Pakistanis is a smaller crime than to support the same dictator for the very personal interests. I can remind everyone what others did during Musharaf era and supported him:
Just see the list here and deny or ignore (as you will surly do), but other readers will not deny these facts:
1- After October 12, 1999 army take over, Supreme Court Of Pakistan endorsed the coup (Iftikhar Ch. was one of the member in the verdict).
2- Iftikhar Choudhary and other judges took PCO oath under a dictators orders.
3- Musharaf announced the Referandum, Imran Khan along with others took part in it and supported Musharaf.
3- Nawaz Sharif made a deal with the same dictator, signed a contract and flee from the country with whole family and servants.
4- Musharaf went on war against terror, PPP and ANP supported and others including MQM kept quite.
5- The local body elections were held, MQM did not participate because of dictatorship but others did.
6- Every one took part in the general elections of 2002.
7- After the elections MMA, MQM, and PMLQ supported Musharaf in imposing LFO and changing the constitution with 17th ammendment.
8- In 2005, again there were local govt. elections and every one took part in them.
9- In 2007, BB met with Musharaf in Abu Dhabi and signed an NRO and got freedom from all the corruption cases.
10- I admit here MQM was also a beneficiary of NRO. but still the deal was between a dictator and BB.
11- In November 2007, Musharaf imposed emergency and MQM neither supported the emergency nor went with the corrupt lawyer's movement. Because that movement was fully supported by the looter of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif and traitor Aitezaz Ahsan. Time has proved that Nawaz Sharif has been freed from all of his cases.
12- If MQM is a criminal in all of these incidents then they must be trialed but how about others? are they above the law?
Zaidi Qasim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Yes, indeed, in order to get money for Karachi MQM supported a dictator. You know why? because your beloved elected politicians were not ready to give any penny to Karachi - rather they were imosing army operations and killing extra judicially the youth of Karachi. To get money from a dictator just to bring some decency to the lives of Pakistanis is a smaller crime than to support the same dictator for the very personal interests. I can remind everyone what others did during Musharaf era and supported him:
Just see the list here and deny or ignore (as you will surly do), but other readers will not deny these facts:
1- After October 12, 1999 army take over, Supreme Court Of Pakistan endorsed the coup (Iftikhar Ch. was one of the member in the verdict).
2- Iftikhar Choudhary and other judges took PCO oath under a dictators orders.
3- Musharaf announced the Referandum, Imran Khan along with others took part in it and supported Musharaf.
3- Nawaz Sharif made a deal with the same dictator, signed a contract and flee from the country with whole family and servants.
4- Musharaf went on war against terror, PPP and ANP supported and others including MQM kept quite.
5- The local body elections were held, MQM did not participate because of dictatorship but others did.
6- Every one took part in the general elections of 2002.
7- After the elections MMA, MQM, and PMLQ supported Musharaf in imposing LFO and changing the constitution with 17th ammendment.
8- In 2005, again there were local govt. elections and every one took part in them.
9- In 2007, BB met with Musharaf in Abu Dhabi and signed an NRO and got freedom from all the corruption cases.
10- I admit here MQM was also a beneficiary of NRO. but still the deal was between a dictator and BB.
11- In November 2007, Musharaf imposed emergency and MQM neither supported the emergency nor went with the corrupt lawyer's movement. Because that movement was fully supported by the looter of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif and traitor Aitezaz Ahsan. Time has proved that Nawaz Sharif has been freed from all of his cases.
12- If MQM is a criminal in all of these incidents then they must be trialed but how about others? are they above the law?[/quote]
Okay, this is a long list of Loyalty of the dictator.This is precisely I want you to admit that you would support a,y and z to get the funds and plum posts which come along with the agreement.And obviously MQ has no shame of supporting a dictator and prolonging his stay in power as long as that dictator provided you with money and give you total authority in Karachi to kill and establish your power using every dirty trick in the book. Very first example of that authoritarian power display was the demolishing of Al Hamra Place which the opponents of MQM use as their head office.In order to grab the power centre, it was essential for MQM to either kill or shut up the desending voice from Karachi.Pervaiz Musharraf's government kept its eyes closed while this bloodshed took hold in Karachi. The other example of the show of the power was on 12th MAY.Musharraf in his subsequent speech reminded everyone that the show of power in Karachi was neccessary and his supportes had shown that they control Karachi.He didn't sound sad or felt any shame on the bloodshed on that night.Rather he was sounded jubilant on that day's messecre in the street of Karachi by his alliant party.The Lfo was indeed the present of the Musharraf Government which MQM helped imposed on Pakistani people.During his emergency and when the CJ was in house arrest with his family and kids,MQM kept Musharraf in power and never issued or said anything against this Emergency. Mqm was still with the dictator and everyone knew what MQM is up to.
I like you and MQM supporters to stand up for Musharraf now and defend him in the supreme court.You have a moral obligation to do that since your were the beneficiary of his power and rule.You enjoyed his dictatorship and took advantage of his power to the fullest.But I also know that MQM is run by an opportunist and manipulator sitting in London. He must have been busy measuring the wind direction now.Sooner or later you will all dance on the tune of the piper......
Just see the list here and deny or ignore (as you will surly do), but other readers will not deny these facts:
1- After October 12, 1999 army take over, Supreme Court Of Pakistan endorsed the coup (Iftikhar Ch. was one of the member in the verdict).
2- Iftikhar Choudhary and other judges took PCO oath under a dictators orders.
3- Musharaf announced the Referandum, Imran Khan along with others took part in it and supported Musharaf.
3- Nawaz Sharif made a deal with the same dictator, signed a contract and flee from the country with whole family and servants.
4- Musharaf went on war against terror, PPP and ANP supported and others including MQM kept quite.
5- The local body elections were held, MQM did not participate because of dictatorship but others did.
6- Every one took part in the general elections of 2002.
7- After the elections MMA, MQM, and PMLQ supported Musharaf in imposing LFO and changing the constitution with 17th ammendment.
8- In 2005, again there were local govt. elections and every one took part in them.
9- In 2007, BB met with Musharaf in Abu Dhabi and signed an NRO and got freedom from all the corruption cases.
10- I admit here MQM was also a beneficiary of NRO. but still the deal was between a dictator and BB.
11- In November 2007, Musharaf imposed emergency and MQM neither supported the emergency nor went with the corrupt lawyer's movement. Because that movement was fully supported by the looter of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif and traitor Aitezaz Ahsan. Time has proved that Nawaz Sharif has been freed from all of his cases.
12- If MQM is a criminal in all of these incidents then they must be trialed but how about others? are they above the law?[/quote]
Okay, this is a long list of Loyalty of the dictator.This is precisely I want you to admit that you would support a,y and z to get the funds and plum posts which come along with the agreement.And obviously MQ has no shame of supporting a dictator and prolonging his stay in power as long as that dictator provided you with money and give you total authority in Karachi to kill and establish your power using every dirty trick in the book. Very first example of that authoritarian power display was the demolishing of Al Hamra Place which the opponents of MQM use as their head office.In order to grab the power centre, it was essential for MQM to either kill or shut up the desending voice from Karachi.Pervaiz Musharraf's government kept its eyes closed while this bloodshed took hold in Karachi. The other example of the show of the power was on 12th MAY.Musharraf in his subsequent speech reminded everyone that the show of power in Karachi was neccessary and his supportes had shown that they control Karachi.He didn't sound sad or felt any shame on the bloodshed on that night.Rather he was sounded jubilant on that day's messecre in the street of Karachi by his alliant party.The Lfo was indeed the present of the Musharraf Government which MQM helped imposed on Pakistani people.During his emergency and when the CJ was in house arrest with his family and kids,MQM kept Musharraf in power and never issued or said anything against this Emergency. Mqm was still with the dictator and everyone knew what MQM is up to.
I like you and MQM supporters to stand up for Musharraf now and defend him in the supreme court.You have a moral obligation to do that since your were the beneficiary of his power and rule.You enjoyed his dictatorship and took advantage of his power to the fullest.But I also know that MQM is run by an opportunist and manipulator sitting in London. He must have been busy measuring the wind direction now.Sooner or later you will all dance on the tune of the piper......
