- If RIBA is "RENTING of Money" and money can be Dollar, Rupee, Gold, Silver, Wheat grain, Rice, Land, Water, etc. This definition leads up to a false conclusion that renting land is Riba as well.
Riba is exchange any two things of the same type in different amount. In a barter system, there is no fixed currency. The units of currency are items of exchange. In that scenario exchanging same-type good in different quantities is just like taking a loan with interest.
- The other issue was Inflation. I shared my view that in an Inflationary enviroment, it is actually the BORROWER who is getting RIBA if the lent loan doesnt not have an interest rate less than the Inflation rate because the VALUE BORROWED was not RETURNED at the end of the loan. (i.e. the returned money is worth less than the money borrowed). The Sheikh said "The borrower is poor and how could be be making interest on borrowed money.?" Once I cleared his views that today its the most powerful who are the borrowers (Nations, corporations and wealthy individuals) who have to most amount of outstanding loans and they are making money off from the borrowed money. It was at that point I felt the Sheikh openned up to me and said never in the History of Mankind has a system this twisted imposed on the humans.
Time value of money is there in interest based economies using fiat currencies. Suppose we have an economic system where banks cannot churn out excess cash as per requirement and where we don't have to deal with foreign currencies. In this system, inflation would be essentially zero and therefore if something is rent without interest, no-one incurs a loss. Also in such a system, the value of currency will not change but the value of goods could change with changes in economy.
You can download an treatise on the subject at http://www.muftitaqiusmani.com/images/stories/downloads/pdf/an introduction to islamic finance.pdf
The book is written by Mualana Taqi Usmani, a re-known scholar in islamic finance from Pakistan.