یونیورسٹیوں پر جنات کا قبضہ

Sphere Manisfest

Senator (1k+ posts)
His biggest problem is that he would accept it from a scientist that probably the Alien life exists somewhere in the universe.
He would accept that this Alien life would be completely different from the human and could be in odd shapes, sizes, colors etc.
But tell him Jin exists in the Universe and he would go mental, like he did in this article.

IF you say to him that there are other dimensions, he would agree.
Tell him that Jin could be living in a different dimension, he would go bissark.
This is his problem.

His reference to Jinns is not in that context. He is referring to this about Sultan Bashiruddin Mehmood:

"Mahmood has published papers concerning
djinni, which are described in the Qur'an as beings made of fire. He has proposed that djinni could be tapped to solve the energy crisis.[SUP][29][/SUP] I think that if we develop our souls, we can develop communication with them, Mr. Bashiruddin Mahmood said about djinni in The Wall Street Journal in an interview in 1988. Every new idea has its opponents, he added. But there is no reason for this controversy over Islam and science because there is no conflict between Islam and science.[SUP][26]"
[/SUP]
 

سہیل خانزادہ

Minister (2k+ posts)
Yes. This happened in Zia era. It was Sultan Bashir ud Din Mehmood who was working in Atomic Energy Commission and later became mulla and writer of book on Islam and Science. He seriously submitted a well written proposal for Gen. Zia and Pakistan Science Foundation for researching into capturing Jinnat and make electricity out of them coz Quran says Jinnat are made of fire and they must be possessing great amount of energy. Lolz.


Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood[SUP][note 1][/SUP](Urdu: سلطان بشیر الدین محمود‎; born 1940;[SUP][1][/SUP] SI), is a Pakistani nuclear engineer and a scholar on Islamic studies who was notoriously subjected for a criminal probe launched by the FIA on suspicions on unauthorized travel in Afghanistan prior to the deadliest terrorist attacks in the United States in 2001.

Having spent a distinguish career in PAEC, he founded the Ummah Tameer-e-Nau (UTN) in 1999 a right-wing organization that was banned and sanctioned by the United States in 2001. Mehmood was among those who were listed and sanctioned by the al-Qaeda sanction committee in December 2001.[SUP][2][/SUP] Having been cleared by the FIA, he has been living in anonymity in Islamabad, authoring books on relationship between Islam and science.
 

JojoBubble

MPA (400+ posts)
You are an ***. Ayone who speaks rationale is Ahmdi, Qadyani, Parsi, Yahoodi and what not.
I'm sure you've not read the article, but jumped to spew your venom.

Anyways, let me tell you that Pervez HoodBoy belongs to "Ismaili" cult ( a branch of Islam), but , at his very young age, felt that ''Ismaili-izm'' was not a proper way of life, so abandoned it despite the outrage of his family and accepted 'Proper Islam". If you want to criticize hi, do it, but involving his belief is the least mean thing anyone could do.

Here is an excerpt from PHB interview.

"
My father, however, was not very comfortable with this. He considered the Agha Khani System as exploitative. His rebellious nature influenced all the children so we did not grow up as traditional as our cousins did. At the age of twelve I began to feel the first elements of rebellion within me. My elder sister was quite uncomfortable with the tradition of praying and fasting. Her discomfort was passed on to me and I rebelled against Ismaili-ism. I remember declaring in my home that Agha Khan was a fraud. That outraged my parents. One day while they were away, I took down all the photographs of Agha Khan from the whole house and smashed them and after smashing them I ran away from home for one day. I was forgiven later on as they were upset about my being away. This was my conversion into proper Islam................"
Is there link to that interview ? any reference? Just curious.
 

MaenChaeyNahiPeeta

MPA (400+ posts)
You are an ***.[/Qoute]

Wow, what a great way to disagree to an opinion. so typical of 'peraiz hoodbhoi' and his followers.


Ayone who speaks rationale is Ahmdi, Qadyani, Parsi, Yahoodi and what not.


yes that guy may speak of other communities but not for muslims.


I'm sure you've not read the article, but jumped to spew your venom.**

jab angraizi maen chhapa tha to hi parh lia tha, so much of contradictions.

despite the outrage of his family and accepted 'Proper Islam".


yeah real islam kia hota hae, i want to follow real islam, please elaborate as I want to know more about it
 

MaenChaeyNahiPeeta

MPA (400+ posts)
by the way, making electricity with the help of jinnat, ha ha what a big bongi,

theories may seem unrealistic until proven. could anyone think that teleportation be made possible by einstein.


Waisay I diasaprove they way the author disagree to the theory. I wonde if scientist (including Einstein vs. Tesla rivalry) could be so harsh to disagree other opinion why blame molvis.
 
Last edited:

Chaudhry_1960

Minister (2k+ posts)
theories may seem unrealistic until proven. could anyone think that teleportation be made possible by einstein.


Waisay I diasaprove they way the author disagree to the theory. I wonde if scientist (including Einstein vs. Tesla rivalry) could be so harsh to disagree other opinion why blame molvis.

چائے پیا کر شاید اسی طرح تیرا دماغ کام کرنے لگے پھر تو ہی دنیا کو جنوں کے ذریعے بجلی بنا کر دے دینا , اور ہاں - ہا ہا ہا
 

Nice2MU

President (40k+ posts)
This Hood Bhai should be asked few questions.

Q 1. Do you believe in God. Answer should be Yes or No.
Q 2. Are you Muslim. Answer should be Yes or No.
Q 3. Do you believe in Quran. Answer should be Yes or No.
If all answers are in yes, then does he believe in Jin or not as Quarn positively point to the existence of Jins and being a Muslim no one can deny this or even show any suspicion. Answer should be Yes or No.
If he still say No, then his all first answers are lies. White lies.

For all your questions his answer is ABC...Meaning he wouldn't answer you straightaway but actually his answer is NO
 

Nice2MU

President (40k+ posts)
So in order to be a scientist, you have to be a muslim?? cuz he is talking about science education, not Tafseer-e-Quran.

No he is rediculing Quran and Hadiths in other words because as per Quran Jinns exist and Hadiths tell what would happen in Grave after death.

Though I am against those who exploite the existance of Jinns for earning money or the way life after death was pictured but Hood Bhai had rediculed it by saying that had that person received SMS from Qabar?

This person is more interested in attacking Islam than focussing his own field. What is his contributions in the field of Physics so far instead of criticising others.
 

Reason

Minister (2k+ posts)
No he is rediculing Quran and Hadiths in other words because as per Quran Jinns exist and Hadiths tell what would happen in Grave after death.

Though I am against those who exploite the existance of Jinns for earning money or the way life after death was pictured but Hood Bhai had rediculed it by saying that had that person received SMS from Qabar?

This person is more interested in attacking Islam than focussing his own field. What is his contributions in the field of Physics so far instead of criticising others.

His contributions are the following papers published:


  • Two-Photon Effects in Lepton-AntiLepton Pair Photoproduction from a Nucleon Target using Real Photons, Authors: Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 054027
  • Probing Quark Distribution Amplitudes Through Generalized Parton Distributions at Large Momentum Transfer, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Feng Yuan, Phys.Rev.Lett. 92 (2004) 012003
  • Explicit Proof that Electroproduction of Transversely Polarized Vector Mesons Vanishes in Perturbative QCD, Pervez Hoodbhoy (University of Maryland and Quaid-e-Azam University), Phys.Rev. D65 (2002) 077501
  • Does the Gluon Spin Contribute in A Gauge Invariant Way to Nucleon Spin? Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 114042
  • Nucleon-Quarkonium Elastic Scattering and the Gluon Contribution to Nucleon Spin, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev.Lett. 82 (1999) 49854987
  • Implications of Color Gauge Symmetry For Nucleon Spin Structure, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Wei Lu, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 074010
  • Quark Orbital-Angular-Momentum Distribution in the Nucleon, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Wei Lu, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 014013
  • The Spin Structure of the Nucleon in the Asymptotic Limit, Ji, J. Tang (MIT), P. Hoodbhoy (Quaid-e-Azam, Pakistan), Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 740743
  • Helicity-Flip Off-Forward Parton Distributions of the Nucleon, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Phys.Rev. D58 (1998) 054006
  • Wavefunction corrections and off-forward gluon distributions in diffractive J/psi electroproduction, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D56 (1997) 388393
  • Relativistic and Binding Energy Corrections to Direct Photon Production In Upsilon Decay, Mohammad Ali Yusuf, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D54 (1996) 33453349
  • Beyond The Colour-Singlet Model For Inelastic J_psi Photoproduction, H. Khan, P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Lett. B382 (1996) 189
  • The Spin Structure of the Nucleon in the Asymptotic Limit, X. Ji, J. Tang (MIT), P. Hoodbhoy (Quaid-e-Azam, Pakistan), Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 740743
  • Novel approach to decays, gluon distributions, and fragmentation functions of heavy quarkonia, Rafia Ali, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D51 (1995) 23022310
  • Quark fragmentation functions in a diquark model for proton and $\Lambda$ hyperon production, Muhammad Nzar, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D51 (1995) 3236
  • Systematic gauge invariant approach to heavy quarkonium decays, Hafsa Khan, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D53 (1996) 25342540
  • Twist-Four Distributions in a Transversely-Polarized Nucleon and the Drell-Yan Process, Pevrez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Xi, Phys.Rev. D50 (1994) 44294435

Now to your ridiculous point of him attacking Islam. Well, if you are going to impose and insert Islam into every little thing and science then there will be reaction. We don't read Quran to study physics, or chemistry, or biology, or maths. There are separate books for that. Science conferences around the world don't take Quranic qoutes to prove their thesis, they take evidence. Now if you are going to have pseudo scientists come to University and tell young people about djinns without presenting any evidence, then they should not only be made fun of but investigated if their science degree is real or fake.
 

Nice2MU

President (40k+ posts)
His contributions are the following papers published:


  • Two-Photon Effects in Lepton-AntiLepton Pair Photoproduction from a Nucleon Target using Real Photons, Authors: Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 054027
  • Probing Quark Distribution Amplitudes Through Generalized Parton Distributions at Large Momentum Transfer, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Feng Yuan, Phys.Rev.Lett. 92 (2004) 012003
  • Explicit Proof that Electroproduction of Transversely Polarized Vector Mesons Vanishes in Perturbative QCD, Pervez Hoodbhoy (University of Maryland and Quaid-e-Azam University), Phys.Rev. D65 (2002) 077501
  • Does the Gluon Spin Contribute in A Gauge Invariant Way to Nucleon Spin? Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 114042
  • Nucleon-Quarkonium Elastic Scattering and the Gluon Contribution to Nucleon Spin, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev.Lett. 82 (1999) 4985–4987
  • Implications of Color Gauge Symmetry For Nucleon Spin Structure, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Wei Lu, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 074010
  • Quark Orbital-Angular-Momentum Distribution in the Nucleon, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Wei Lu, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 014013
  • The Spin Structure of the Nucleon in the Asymptotic Limit, Ji, J. Tang (MIT), P. Hoodbhoy (Quaid-e-Azam, Pakistan), Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 740–743
  • Helicity-Flip Off-Forward Parton Distributions of the Nucleon, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Ji, Phys.Rev. D58 (1998) 054006
  • Wavefunction corrections and off-forward gluon distributions in diffractive J/psi electroproduction, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D56 (1997) 388–393
  • Relativistic and Binding Energy Corrections to Direct Photon Production In Upsilon Decay, Mohammad Ali Yusuf, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D54 (1996) 3345–3349
  • Beyond The Colour-Singlet Model For Inelastic J_psi Photoproduction, H. Khan, P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Lett. B382 (1996) 189
  • The Spin Structure of the Nucleon in the Asymptotic Limit, X. Ji, J. Tang (MIT), P. Hoodbhoy (Quaid-e-Azam, Pakistan), Phys.Rev.Lett. 76 (1996) 740–743
  • Novel approach to decays, gluon distributions, and fragmentation functions of heavy quarkonia, Rafia Ali, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D51 (1995) 2302–2310
  • Quark fragmentation functions in a diquark model for proton and $\Lambda$ hyperon production, Muhammad Nzar, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D51 (1995) 32–36
  • Systematic gauge invariant approach to heavy quarkonium decays, Hafsa Khan, Pervez Hoodbhoy, Phys.Rev. D53 (1996) 2534–2540
  • Twist-Four Distributions in a Transversely-Polarized Nucleon and the Drell-Yan Process, Pevrez Hoodbhoy, Xiangdong Xi, Phys.Rev. D50 (1994) 4429–4435

Now to your ridiculous point of him attacking Islam. Well, if you are going to impose and insert Islam into every little thing and science then there will be reaction. We don't read Quran to study physics, or chemistry, or biology, or maths. There are separate books for that. Science conferences around the world don't take Quranic qoutes to prove their thesis, they take evidence. Now if you are going to have pseudo scientists come to University and tell young people about djinns without presenting any evidence, then they should not only be made fun of but investigated if their science degree is real or fake.




I can give the research papers of every tom **** and harry. Publishing research work is not an achievement for the so called calibre he or his blind followers like you claim. Had he win any awards in Physics or any extra ordinary work which has been recognised by the world.

And idiot, it is not ridiculous point. If he considers himself as scientist then better stick himself to his science. Why does he interfering the beliefs of Muslims? Had he attack any Christianity belief so far? Why is he so obsessed with Islam and Islamic content? It is easily can be said that he is on mission.

The matter of Jinns or Life after the death mainly belong to beliefs of the people and whoever believe it they don't need any evidence. Why the hell this person went there? And in University, there is not only science is taught but many different faculties are taught there whose education may not based on science so you mean, no one should give such lectures then in uni? This is called Fascism in simple words.
 

Reason

Minister (2k+ posts)
I can give the research papers of every tom **** and harry. Publishing research work is not an achievement for the so called calibre he or his blind followers like you claim. Had he win any awards in Physics or any extra ordinary work which has been recognised by the world.

And idiot, it is not ridiculous point. If he considers himself as scientist then better stick himself to his science. Why does he interfering the beliefs of Muslims? Had he attack any Christianity belief so far? Why is he so obsessed with Islam and Islamic content? It is easily can be said that he is on mission.

The matter of Jinns or Life after the death mainly belong to beliefs of the people and whoever believe it they don't need any evidence. Why the hell this person went there? And in University, there is not only science is taught but many different faculties are taught there whose education may not based on science so you mean, no one should give such lectures then in uni? This is called Fascism in simple words.

Well, why is the "Ghostbuster" interfering in science?? Why hasn't he produce energy by capturing ghost?? So you don't like it when Dr. Hoodhboy interferes in islam (and btw his facts regarding science and Islam are 100% correct), but its all good when a nutjob jinn expert tries to be a scientist. And secondly the papers I posted, aren't just papers of every Tom **** and Harry, they are of significant importance and published international science journals. But you don't know that, you see if you did knew the importance and understood science you wouldn't post that comment. The reason why he doesn't "attack christianity but attacks Islam" (as you so eloquently put it) is because Pakistan is 97% muslim. Now if you honestly believe Islam is not what ISIS or other extremist represent and is the truth and the only truth, then you should not have problems explaining it logically. Every time someone criticizes Islam, people become defensive.
 

Nice2MU

President (40k+ posts)
Well, why is the "Ghostbuster" interfering in science?? Why hasn't he produce energy by capturing ghost?? So you don't like it when Dr. Hoodhboy interferes in islam (and btw his facts regarding science and Islam are 100% correct), but its all good when a nutjob jinn expert tries to be a scientist. And secondly the papers I posted, aren't just papers of every Tom **** and Harry, they are of significant importance and published international science journals. But you don't know that, you see if you did knew the importance and understood science you wouldn't post that comment. The reason why he doesn't "attack christianity but attacks Islam" (as you so eloquently put it) is because Pakistan is 97% muslim. Now if you honestly believe Islam is not what ISIS or other extremist represent and is the truth and the only truth, then you should not have problems explaining it logically. Every time someone criticizes Islam, people become defensive.

All your posts are not related to the thread even or you even don't know what was this thread about?

I know this Atheist Hood Bhai and other Atheists in QA very well. All their agenda is to mock Islam in one way or the other way. Few months back he was criticising Mosques in QA Uni by saying that people come to Uni for education not for prayers. I didn't see any Non-Muslim Professor in England who had said this. He advocates civil liberty but acting 180 degree opposite against it.

And about 97% Muslim statement, you mean to say that he should limit his so called Ilm to Pakistan only? Hun! what a lame and childish excuse? Give me a break. Then when he goes to India, he should criticise Hindus and if goes to any Christian Country, he should criticise Christains there, No?

He is not targeting only the Muslims of Pak but the whole world otherwise Christians or Hindus are doing more 'rubbish' things than Muslims but his only target is Islam and we are right that he is only targeting Islam because he can't do Christians who had even killed Scientists. Muslims didn't kill any scientist.

And I know all these Scientific Journals and its impact factors very well so don't give me lecture on it. If you had been his student or anything else, it doesn't mean that you are all in all and this is the problem of Liberal Fascists, like you, that they consider themselves the most Educated and Clever creature of this world while ridiculing anyone who encounters him on any issue specially on Islam.

I repeat again, publishing research papers is not big deal. Show me any of his achievement or invention or any recognition on World level instead of giving me these Childish Excuses. He is famous in Pakistan only due to his anti-Islam thinkings rather than in physics
 
Last edited:

MAwan

Senator (1k+ posts)
He think he is Albert Einstein of Pakistan,he got more fame about his criticism on Islam and Pakistani society rather than he would have done something good in physics.we can say he is/was old version of MALALA.Whoever say something against Islam or Muslim he will be famous in west so not surprised if his research work or articles published in international magazine or journals.For me there is no difference between this pseudo intellectual and mumtaz qadri, both are extremist in their views ,one had done something due to lack of knowledge (By killing salaman taseer ) and other is doing(to mock about islam and its values) while knowing everything.
 

MAwan

Senator (1k+ posts)
All your posts are not related to the thread even or you even don't know what was this thread about?

I know this Atheist Hood Bhai and other Atheist in QA very well. All their agenda is to mock Islam in one way or the other way. Few months back he was criticising Mosques in QA by saying that people come to Uni for education not for prayer. I didn't see any Non-Muslim Professor in England who had said this. He advocates civil liberty but acting 180 degree against it.

And about 97% Muslim statement, you mean to say that he should limit his so called Ilm to Pakistan only? Hun! what a lame and childish excuse? Give me a break. Then when he goes to India, he should criticise Hindus and if go to any Christian Country, he should criticise Hindus there, No?

He is not targeting only the Muslims of Pak but the whole world otherwise Christians or Hindus are doing more 'rubbish' things than Muslims but his only target is Islam and we are right that he is only targeting Islam because he can't do Christians who had even killed Scientists. Muslims didn't kill any scientists.

And I know all these Scientific Journals and its impact factors very well so don't give me lecture on it. If you had been his student or anything else, it doesn't me you are all in all and this is the problem of Liberal Fascists, like you, that they consider themselves the most Educated and Clever creature of this world while ridiculing anyone who encounter him on any issue specially on Islam.

I repeat again, publishing research paper is not big deal. Show me any of his achievement or invention or any recognition on World level instead of giving me these Childish Excuses. He is famous in Pakistan only due to his anti-Islam thinkings.

You are right,that's only way to get fame in the world to say against Islam,examples are malala,tasleema nasreen,sulman Rushdie etc
 

Back
Top