لگتا ہے آپ بحث مباحثے کے بنیادی قاعدوں سے بھی لاعلم ہیں، غامدی کا حوالہ اس لئے نہیں دیا کہ میں اس سے عقیدت رکھتا ہوں، اس لئے دیا کہ وہ آپ ہی کے مذہب سے تعلق رکھتا ہے اور اس کے بھی اچھے خاصے پیروکار ہیں۔ یعنی اگر آپ کو لگتا ہے کہ میں کسی تعصب کی بنا پر بلاسفیمی کو نارملائز کرنے کی بات کررہا ہوں تو غامدی کو تو اسلام سے کوئی تعصب نہیں ہونا چاہئے نا۔۔۔
باقی بلاسفیمی کو نارملائز کرنے سے میری مراد ہے کہ بلاسفیمی پر مسلمانوں کو حساسیت دکھانے کی ضرورت نہیں۔ جب مسلمان ری ایکٹ کرنا چھوڑ دیں گے تو بلاسفیمی ہونا اپنے آپ بند ہوجائے گی۔ یہ انسانی فطرت ہے کہ جس کام سے اسے روکا جائے وہ کرتا ہے۔ آپ جب یورپی معاشروں پر ڈنڈے سے یا ان کے لوگوں پر حملے کرکے زبردستی اپنا احترام کروانا چاہیں گے تو لازماً وہ بلاسفیمی کریں گے۔۔ آپ ری ایکٹ کرنا چھوڑدیں، کسی کو نہیں پڑی کہ وہ سالوں پرانے گڑے مردوں کو اکھاڑ کر ان کو زیربحث لائیں، عام مسلمانوں کو یہ بات سمجھانے کی ضرورت ہے کہ عقیدہ اور مذہب ہر فرد کا پرائیویٹ معاملہ ہے اور ہر شخص کی مقدس ہستی صرف اسی کیلئے مقدس ہے۔۔۔ یورپ کے لوگ کسی زمانے میں عیسیٰ اور بائبل کے معاملے میں بہت حساس تھے، آج وہ نارملائز ہوچکے ہیں اس لئے مذہب کو لے کر وہاں دنگا فساد بھی نہیں مچتا۔۔۔
Not sure you have evidence in support of your claim. But I do, let me start by Ilm deen
on the 6th of April 1929, Ilm-din assassinated a book publisher named Mahashe Rajpal for publishing the book (which mocked prophet Muhammad PBUH) There was no law against blasphemy in British India at that time. There was no discussion of killing a blasphemer.
You have written that ignorance of such acts would mean such acts will die down.
Not true. If you have lived in the west then you know that many people here insult Jesus Christ. Some commonly say Jesus F -- - Christ. But has that stopped blasphemy against Jesus Christ? Problems do not go away by burying your head in the sand like an ostrich.
Before you decide on a penalty you must know what goes through a person's mind.
I give you a real-life example ( Excuse me if I have given you the same example in the past ).
In 1997 in Sydney a terrible murder took place. The person murdered was a Pakistan, a 6 feet tall, well-built Punjabi, The murderer was a 5 feet tall, skinny Muslim Indian Fijian.
When this huge built Pakistani arrived in Sydney, he didn't have enough money. This Fijian Indian man gave him money, found him a job. This Indian man was in tableeghi Jamat. He left for tableegh. He came home without any notice and when he entered his home, he found his wife in bed with this Pakistani man. Fijian man in a rage ran to the kitchen to grab a knife, his wife ran to one of the rooms and locked herself, but Fijian got hold of the man, who was much bigger than him and attacked him with the knife In his post mortem report it was revealed that there were over 60 knife wounds. It means the Fijian man kept attacking the Pakistani man much after he had died in his rage. After killing the man he walked into a Police station to admit the murder.
Why I am telling you this story? The judge's decision is very interesting. It was the first time that a Sydney Judge allowed bail of a murder accused. He was given only 4 or 5 years of imprisonment. In the judgment, the judge wrote that before I decided about the case, I went through Muslim literature and tried to understand what went through his mind. The agony he experienced was uncontrollable. He was not a danger to society. So he was given only 4 years penalty.
The point I am trying to make is that, When a Muslim grows up respecting deeply our beloved prophet Muhammad PBUH, and one insults him, then you need to understand what goes through that person's mind, before mocking that person.