قطری خط بوگس اور بے بنیاد ہے۔ سپریم کورٹ

[Zaidi Qasim]

You are right its not the letter but facts in letter are bogus.

How do you know ? This was a question posed to the lawyer. If the letter is not fake , then the facts written in the letter are also not fake. This is a letter supporting the NS's argument about the Qatari investment and has been verified by Qatari.

 

[Okara]

Its same like the agreement submitted in SC with Calibri fonts with wrong dates but agreement not bogus.

How do you know ? This was a question posed to the lawyer. If the letter is not fake , then the facts written in the letter are also not fake. This is a letter supporting the NS's argument about the Qatari investment and has been verified by Qatari.

 

[Zaidi Qasim]

Its same like the agreement submitted in SC with Calibri fonts with wrong dates but agreement not bogus.

The font was available long before 2006.If you can prove that it wasn't available before 2006 in any form, I will quit ... so, stop mismatching the argument.

 

[Okara]

What kind of proof is acceptable for you?

The font was available long before 2006.If you can prove that it wasn't available before 2006 in any form, I will quit ... so, stop mismatching the argument.

 

[Zaidi Qasim]

What kind of proof is acceptable for you?

The kind of Micky mouse proof of the reports which were prepared during Musharraf's era are not acceptable. Fabrication is something which needs to be further probe and the intention of those who were sitting faking facts.

 

[SahirShah]

What kind of proof is acceptable for you?

Perhaps this kind ..... ?? (omg):biggthumpup:

courtesy of a twitterati, jazeera007.

 

[Okara]

Not intelligent like you so wanted to know what exactly is an acceptable proof for you?

The kind of Micky mouse proof of the reports which were prepared during Musharraf's era are not acceptable. Fabrication is something which needs to be further probe and the intention of those who were sitting faking facts.

 

[Zaidi Qasim]

Not intelligent like you so wanted to know what exactly is an acceptable proof for you?

You don't need to be intelligent but rather honest about things. Someone with a team of corrupts needs not to be worried about his intelligence.Look at the monkeys jumping up and down on this fake news thread . This shows the kind of desperation and a desire to get the power through back door and how urgent is the need.

 

[Okara]

Are you saying to get into power through Gen Zia and Gen Jillani was a democratic way? Are you saying taking money from ISI and Usama bin Laden to topple Benazir Government was a democratic method? Are you saying meeting COAS secretly is a way to strengthen democracy? Are you saying in memogate case helping Army was a democratic decision? Are you saying letting Gen Pervez Musharraf outside Pakistan was to strengthen democracy?
Above all to deal with Military to go to Saudi Arabia a democratic way?
Anyway now the first time in history of Pakistan the corrupts are facing the music and can hear their songs. Lets wait for few days and world will see if the person who had a resident VISA of Dubai while PM is innocent or not?

You don't need to be intelligent but rather honest about things. Someone with a team of corrupts needs not to be worried about his intelligence.Look at the monkeys jumping up and down on this fake news thread . This shows the kind of desperation and a desire to get the power through back door and how urgent is the need.

 

[Pakistan2017]

The font was available long before 2006.If you can prove that it wasn't available before 2006 in any form, I will quit ... so, stop mismatching the argument.

Why Don't You PROVE That The Font Was Commercially Available On February 06 2006, When Forged Document Of Trust Was Typed?