RajaRawal111
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
جنابے عمران خان نے بہت بہت بہت انتظار کے باوجود ڈرٹی ھیری جنرل فیصل نصیر کے خلاف عدالت میں بیان نہ دے کر اسے قابل احترام قرار دیا ہے
اس لئے ساری قوم یوتھ کو حکم دیا جاتا ہے کہ قوم یوتھ اسے اب اپنے ابو کا درجہ دۓ
اور پینتی پنچروں کی طرح ڈرٹی ہیری کے لئے کہا سنا گیا سب ایک سیاسی بیان اور بوجے نچانے والی ڈگ ڈگی سمجھا جاۓ
Quote:
A detailed judgment issued by the court sheds light on Khan’s consistent refusal to record his statement, despite repeated efforts by the prosecution.
The court noted that the trial was prolonged primarily due to Khan’s reluctance to testify. He was summoned multiple times and offered the option to appear via video link, but the court record shows that each time, Khan cited the unavailability of his legal counsel as the reason for his non-participation.
"In this regard, letters and applications of the prosecution are on record," the judgment states. "But the said witness [Imran Khan] demonstrated reluctance, unwillingness, and deliberate avoidance in recording his statement before this court".
www.geo.tv
اس لئے ساری قوم یوتھ کو حکم دیا جاتا ہے کہ قوم یوتھ اسے اب اپنے ابو کا درجہ دۓ
اور پینتی پنچروں کی طرح ڈرٹی ہیری کے لئے کہا سنا گیا سب ایک سیاسی بیان اور بوجے نچانے والی ڈگ ڈگی سمجھا جاۓ

Quote:
A detailed judgment issued by the court sheds light on Khan’s consistent refusal to record his statement, despite repeated efforts by the prosecution.
The court noted that the trial was prolonged primarily due to Khan’s reluctance to testify. He was summoned multiple times and offered the option to appear via video link, but the court record shows that each time, Khan cited the unavailability of his legal counsel as the reason for his non-participation.
"In this regard, letters and applications of the prosecution are on record," the judgment states. "But the said witness [Imran Khan] demonstrated reluctance, unwillingness, and deliberate avoidance in recording his statement before this court".

Wazirabad firing: Why didn't Imran testify against those he accused?
Court's judgment sheds light on former prime minister's consistent refusal to record his statement
