When The Moon Split

Imran Siddiqi

Minister (2k+ posts)
Earth's Gravitational Pull Cracks Open the Moon


Earth's gravitational pull is massaging the moon, opening up faults in the lunar crust, researchers say.

Just as the moon's gravitational pull causes seas and lakes to rise and fall as tides on Earth, the Earth exerts tidal forces on the moon. Scientists have known this for a while, but now they've found that Earth's pull actually opens up faults on the moon."We know the close relationship between the Earth and the moon goes back to their origins, but what a surprise [it was] to find the Earth is still helping to shape the moon," study lead author Thomas Watters, a planetary scientist at the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., told Space.com. [The Moon: 10 Surprising Lunar Facts]

The researchers analyzed data from NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which launched in 2009. In 2010, the spacecraft helped scientists discover that the moon is shrinking: High-resolution LRO images revealed 14 lobe-shaped fault scarps, or cliffs, which likely formed as the hot interior of the moon cooled and contracted, forcing the solid crust to buckle.

After more than six years in orbit and imaging nearly three-quarters of the moon's surface, LRO has detected more than 3,200 of these fault scarps. These cliffs are the most common tectonic feature on the moon, and are typically dozens of yards or meters high and less than about 6 miles (10 kilometers) long. Previous research had suggested they were less than 50 million years old, and are likely still actively forming today.

If the only influence on lunar fault scarp formation was the cooling of the moon's interior, the orientations of these cliffs should be random, because the forces of contraction would be equal in strength in all directions, researchers said.
Earths_Gravitational_Pull_Cracks_Open-e4b5a76b9159e71d182055d578b4f1f8


"It was a big surprise to find that the fault scarps don't have random orientations," Watters said.
Instead, "there is a pattern in the orientations of the thousands of faults, and it suggests something else is influencing their formation, something that's also acting on a global scale," Watters said in a statement. "That something is the Earth's gravitational pull."

Earth's tidal forces do not act equally across the surface of the entire moon. Instead, they act most strongly on the parts of the moon that are either closest to or farthest away from Earth. The result is that many scarps are lined up north to south at low and mid latitudes near the moon's equator and east to west at high latitudes near the moon's poles.

The effects of Earth's tidal forces are likely about 50 to 100 times smaller than those from the moon's contraction, Watters said. A model incorporating the effects of tidal and contractional forces on the moon's surface closely matched the fault scarps observed on the moon, he added.

"With LRO, we've been able to study the moon globally in detail not yet possible with any other body in the solar system beyond Earth, and the LRO data set enables us to tease out subtle but important processes that would otherwise remain hidden," John Keller, LRO project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in a different statement.

If these lunar faults are still active, shallow "moonquakes" might occur along them. These rumbles should happen most often when Earth's tidal effects are greatest on the moon — when the moon is farthest away from the Earth in its orbit. A network of seismometers on the moon's surface could one day detect these quakes, Watters said.

Watters and his colleaguesdetailed their findings in the October issue of the journal Geology.

Source
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sngilani

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)



NASA photograph from Apollo 10 in 1969. A scar on the surface of the moon alleged to be evidence of a healed split



Apollo mission photographs of the Rima Ariadaeus revealed a rift line across the surface of the moon. A 2004 book by Zaghloul El-Naggar reproduces one of these photographs and says that British Muslim David Musa Pidcock told him he had seen a 1978 "program" (sic) in which he claimed that unnamed US space scientists had said that "the moon had been split a long time ago and rejoined, and there is a lot of concrete evidence on the surface of the moon to prove this". This was reported as proof of splitting by news services such as Jafariya News and on Internet Web sites. On being asked in 2010, NASA scientist Brad Bailey said, "My recommendation is to not believe everything you read on the internet. Peer-reviewed papers are the only scientifically valid sources of information out there. No current scientific evidence reports that the Moon was split into two (or more) parts and then reassembled at any point in the past.
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
NASA already clarified on this. The crack is only a couple hundred km have nothing to do with any split.




NASA photograph from Apollo 10 in 1969. A scar on the surface of the moon alleged to be evidence of a healed split



Apollo mission photographs of the Rima Ariadaeus revealed a rift line across the surface of the moon. A 2004 book by Zaghloul El-Naggar reproduces one of these photographs and says that British Muslim David Musa Pidcock told him he had seen a 1978 "program" (sic) in which he claimed that unnamed US space scientists had said that "the moon had been split a long time ago and rejoined, and there is a lot of concrete evidence on the surface of the moon to prove this". This was reported as proof of splitting by news services such as Jafariya News and on Internet Web sites. On being asked in 2010, NASA scientist Brad Bailey said, "My recommendation is to not believe everything you read on the internet. Peer-reviewed papers are the only scientifically valid sources of information out there. No current scientific evidence reports that the Moon was split into two (or more) parts and then reassembled at any point in the past.
 

Yasir1983

MPA (400+ posts)
Apart from this Topic No science can prove or believe in the ressuraction of human beings on the day of judgement? can science explain what is our soul? science won't prove it neither the scientist beleive. But being a muslim one must believe so its all the matter of faith.Science is ever evolving, today scientist beleive on what ever evidence or experiments they do...they come up with a theory or scientific explanation and maybe after 5-10 years they may come up with some different explanation of a certain topic. The point is scientific explnation of certain things keep changing or evolving but word of ALLAH(SWT) remains constant the same btw i am not against Science but i belive human knowledge is limited and we can not cross boundaries set by ALLAH(SWT) of our human intelligence.
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Truth is science is based on facts and it is the only knowledge we have. God is creation of our own imaginations to fill in the gaps to the answers we do not have. Humans are not only insecure, they are arrogant and like to believe they are the smartest and they have to have an answer for everything, instead of accepting the limits of their understanding and suspend judgement until they know the answer, instead of creating a supernatural being and saying it was God.
The definition of faith is to believe something without any proof or facts and no religion is based on proof, people follow it because they are born in it or chose to follow it for personal reasons, but it does not answer any questions and has no practical implications. No holy book has any knowledge or facts or mathematical formulas that can help provide any answer about the universe and how it works, everything we have for example the clothes we wear (our ancestors invented needles from bones) to cars and computers is a product of science. Quran does not mention anything outside of the solar system except for the 4 planets that are observable with the naked eye. It does not tell how big the universe is, how old it is. No mention of Galaxies or any other objects. Doesn't tell us what stars are. It also says Earth is flat as a carpet, the biggest object in the universe, everything revolves around the Earth and the Sun rises and sets from the Earths surface and then goes under the flat Earth and prays to Allah all night, then asks for permission to rise in the morning again, this belief was followed for 400 years until scientist in Baghdad shamed the Arabs of having anti-scientific beliefs.
Ask yourself what answers did those holy books answer.
We know that black holes are strong enough to punch a hole through fabric of space time as well, we cannot even imagine what super massive black holes can do. Answering such question by God in holy books is a far shot, they do not even mention it. Therefore science is the only way to answer existential questions as religion answers zero, just by saying God did it is defeatist and dishonest. We need to know how it happen and what everything is, Dark matter, black holes, galaxies etc.

Apart from this Topic No science can prove or believe in the ressuraction of human beings on the day of judgement? can science explain what is our soul? science won't prove it neither the scientist beleive. But being a muslim one must believe so its all the matter of faith.Science is ever evolving, today scientist beleive on what ever evidence or experiments they do...they come up with a theory or scientific explanation and maybe after 5-10 years they may come up with some different explanation of a certain topic. The point is scientific explnation of certain things keep changing or evolving but word of ALLAH(SWT) remains constant the same btw i am not against Science but i belive human knowledge is limited and we can not cross boundaries set by ALLAH(SWT) of our human intelligence.
 
Last edited:

lurker

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
The realm of God and Religion is the realm of Philosophy in my opinion; not Science. People live their lives based on certain ideologies and philosophies.