thedude
Councller (250+ posts)

Can anyone explain to me why Hamid Khan is not a shameless character for being an advocate of Malik Riaz cases until the very last minute (he withdrew just a couple days ago)?
I understand the "lawyer's right to pick his client" but that doesn't solve the problem when "he has joined a political party that has certain ideology" ... Would Hamid Khan invoke the same lawyer's rights if he decides to be an advocate for Zardari or Gilani? ... what happened to "conflict of interest"?
Malik Riaz is not a politician but still he's so notorious for being a land mafia that the a senior member of a party that shouts "Change, Change, Change" should've known better!
P.S.: Can anyone tell me on which program he was asked such questions and what did he reply? Oh wait I forgot, media itself is a bikaoo maal ... (except for Talat Hussain, Nadeem Malik, and very few others)
Last edited: