Altruist
Minister (2k+ posts)
Why does Pakistan need courts? To hear about Chicken theft cases.
Why so-called judiciary has not lived up to expectations - not their own but people's expectations?
Why does it have judges which push their master's cases - e.g., three benches in 30-hours to hear his master's case?
Why do the judges who let a criminal get out of the country on an Rs. 50 bonds are still around?
How a judge who can't give a money trail of his purchases for overseas properties can hear any case involving a money trail - and a matter of fact any case.
Why someone involved in a petty theft is sent to jail whereas those who have looted the country roam free?
What have courts delivered on Mega Corruption cases?
When an elected government was being toppled by Horse Trading then why judiciary did not respond?
What other urgent case superior courts were addressing when the whole nation was sent into chaos by one crooked man?
By the way, the whole world knows him by Mr. 10% but Pakistani courts were never able to convict him - Isn't it a score card of the Pakistani judiciary?
Why after so many years Model Town criminals are not sentenced?
The mastermind of that incident who pretended to be sick in all these years is now the interior minister.
All his sickness is gone. Did anyone care to find out why this man was not tried?
The current PM himself is involved in mega corruption but claims he has never done any corruption.
Except for politicians, why does money not pour into anyone else bank accounts?
This man claims he has no knowledge of who sent the money, which was coming into his accounts on a regular basis, but he kept using that money. Every man except the courts knows that was corruption money but the courts were unable to indict the man due to one excuse or the other. Why this man was released on bail and why this textbook case of money laundry was not brought to an end?
Now when the majority of those in the sitting government is either on bail or are involved in cases their priority is to dilute or remove pieces of evidence against them. One officer who investigated cases against the current PM was first pushed from his job and then harassed so much that he has a heart attack and died. Another officer got a heart attack. Does the Superior judiciary care to stop this and make sure no evidence against the current criminal regime is tempered or destroyed?
Why so-called judiciary has not lived up to expectations - not their own but people's expectations?
Why does it have judges which push their master's cases - e.g., three benches in 30-hours to hear his master's case?
Why do the judges who let a criminal get out of the country on an Rs. 50 bonds are still around?
How a judge who can't give a money trail of his purchases for overseas properties can hear any case involving a money trail - and a matter of fact any case.
Why someone involved in a petty theft is sent to jail whereas those who have looted the country roam free?
What have courts delivered on Mega Corruption cases?
When an elected government was being toppled by Horse Trading then why judiciary did not respond?
What other urgent case superior courts were addressing when the whole nation was sent into chaos by one crooked man?
By the way, the whole world knows him by Mr. 10% but Pakistani courts were never able to convict him - Isn't it a score card of the Pakistani judiciary?
Why after so many years Model Town criminals are not sentenced?
The mastermind of that incident who pretended to be sick in all these years is now the interior minister.
All his sickness is gone. Did anyone care to find out why this man was not tried?
The current PM himself is involved in mega corruption but claims he has never done any corruption.
Except for politicians, why does money not pour into anyone else bank accounts?
This man claims he has no knowledge of who sent the money, which was coming into his accounts on a regular basis, but he kept using that money. Every man except the courts knows that was corruption money but the courts were unable to indict the man due to one excuse or the other. Why this man was released on bail and why this textbook case of money laundry was not brought to an end?
Now when the majority of those in the sitting government is either on bail or are involved in cases their priority is to dilute or remove pieces of evidence against them. One officer who investigated cases against the current PM was first pushed from his job and then harassed so much that he has a heart attack and died. Another officer got a heart attack. Does the Superior judiciary care to stop this and make sure no evidence against the current criminal regime is tempered or destroyed?
