Why Didn’t Pakistan Respond to Indian Aggression?

[Icarus]

Jets were taken down as a defensive measure by PAF. Reply to missile strikes is due 100%. Banya piar se nahin manta, bc mazaq hay 31 civilians killed and no repercussions.

Bro but what have done in response? they have killed our innocent civilians. this is embarrassing ...

 

[Icarus]

Bhai kiya ab aisay hi begairthon ki zindagi guzarni paregi ?

 

[digitalzygot1]

Tit for tat. Respond with 48 missile strikes in same number of locations as they did.

 

[Icarus]

Tit for tat. Respond with 48 missile strikes in same number of locations as they did.

Agar nahi kiya toh bachi kuchi izzat bhi khatam ho jayegi. Hamare bachay maray gaye hain ...

 

[digitalzygot1]

100%. In kutton ko paal rahay hain jo apnon ko martay hain. Dhekho yah army kia karte hay. PAF tuu hamesha se top class rahe hay. Remember J10C s were ordered when Khan was in power.

 

[Will_Bite]

All airports in Pakistan have reopened. Statement by uncle trump for mediation has already come in. Pak govt has repeated it's actions of 1999 post kargil.

 

[Husain中川日本]

Despite India’s recent military actions, Pakistan has not mounted a direct, verifiable military response. Instead, it has claimed to have downed seven Indian aircraft—assertions which India denies and remain unconfirmed by independent sources.

A French intelligence official reportedly told CNN that one Indian Rafale jet was shot down. Meanwhile, Reuters reported that three Indian fighter jets crashed in Jammu and Kashmir; however, the causes of those crashes are unclear, and no direct link to Pakistani action has been established.

Is it a mere coincidence that all those planes went down in India?
Not a single downed plane fell in Pakistan?

If Pakistan indeed shot down Indian aircrafts, rather than doing press conferences, it must present credible evidence to the international community.

India attacked the Neelam-Jhelum Hydro project. What does it have to do with the precision strikes that India claims at terrorist camps?

Was an attack on the Neelam-Jhelum Hydro project NOT an aggression?
If it was, then why did Pakistan not respond by attacking the Indian Kishanganga Dam?

It is beginning to seem like Pakistan is more interested in an information war rather than responding decisively to Indian aggression.

ٹوپی ڈرامہ ، مودی نے بہار کا الیکشن جیتنا ہے ، پاکستانی جرنیلوں نے سپریم کورٹ فتح کرنا تھا ، آپریشن مکمل ، کھیل ختم اور پیسہ ہضم

 

[patwari_sab]

IMF ki bheek par economy kari ha.. phir kis tara ka jawab

 

[aliahmad297622]

TERI BUND MARNAY K LIYE MUNIR MECHANIC AAIN GAAY INDIAN
LUMNER ONE K SATH TU APNEE BUND PAY TAIL LAGA K RAKHNA
KHINZEER UL NASAL HARAMI GADDAR ARMY
AND KHINZEER UL NASAL PATWAREES

Chawal

 

[tracker22]

where the hell is Pakistan defense system? There is no technology to shot down incoming missiles from India ?

 

[Not_Guilty]

The suspension could potentially revive the proxy warfare tactics that the Simla framework aimed to curb. It may not have immediate tactical consequences, but could open the door to greater diplomatic and military brinkmanship. Revival of hostilities or border instability could derail developmental and democratic consolidation efforts in J&K’s post-Article 370 abrogation. The escalation conflict between two nuclear-armed states have already raised alarms in the international community, prompting calls for restraint and dialogue.

The suspension of the Simla Agreement has provided India with an opportunity to recalibrate its security and diplomatic strategies. It also strengthened the case for Pakistan’s re-listing in the Financial Action Task Force grey list.

By disregarding the Simla Agreement, Pakistan has done a great favour to India and Prime Minister Modi to reclaim Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, something that the entire political class of India would support. India has nearly $680 billion in foreign exchange reserves, while Pakistan’s are $15 billion. Pakistan cannot sustain a conflict. The extent of armed conflict will be graded. It is time to wait and watch as things unfold.

 

[Icarus]

The suspension could potentially revive the proxy warfare tactics that the Simla framework aimed to curb. It may not have immediate tactical consequences, but could open the door to greater diplomatic and military brinkmanship. Revival of hostilities or border instability could derail developmental and democratic consolidation efforts in J&K’s post-Article 370 abrogation. The escalation conflict between two nuclear-armed states have already raised alarms in the international community, prompting calls for restraint and dialogue.

The suspension of the Simla Agreement has provided India with an opportunity to recalibrate its security and diplomatic strategies. It also strengthened the case for Pakistan’s re-listing in the Financial Action Task Force grey list.

By disregarding the Simla Agreement, Pakistan has done a great favour to India and Prime Minister Modi to reclaim Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, something that the entire political class of India would support. India has nearly $680 billion in foreign exchange reserves, while Pakistan’s are $15 billion. Pakistan cannot sustain a conflict. The extent of armed conflict will be graded. It is time to wait and watch as things unfold.

I do understand the analysis and the cards we hold at this hour of our need. Lekin behanchod koi izzat aur gerath bhi koi cheez hothi hai. If we dont have th reserves, we should bend our asses for India to fuck? is hat what you are saying?