Religion is a very destructive power which should never be the base for Politics and state.
Rest I do not agree with Iqbal on several issues. His own son says that "Subha ka iqbal aur hai aur shaam ka aur".
Iran has never followed Hazrat Umar, Mr Zaid, they are shia and dont prefer hazrat Umar. We are not azzholes. Chakkar na do baba g.
If Hazrat Umar's system was so perfect why immediately after him, hazrat Usman and Hazrat Ali got killed? And that PERFECT SYSTEM was broken into one Monarchy running by Amir Moaaviya and one Khilafat running by hazrta Ali.
Even if we take the hypothesis that like hazrat Umar chose 5 men for Khalifa-to-be, we should do that system now. How would you find a person like Umar NOW who has same level of wisdom and sincerity. Keep in view the fact that not all Sahaba liked Hazrat Umar's committee.
Without democracy, Mr Ziad, how would you elect a Khalifa? Who will decide? YOU? Mulla Umar? Osama bin Ladan? Saudi Shah? Nawaz Shareef? Zardari? Kindly elaborate who will choose Khalifa, what would be the process?
How would you ensure that Khilaafat would result in social justice and it wont become a toy in the hands of Royalty like it was in the 19th century in Turkey and through out the history of Islam.
If Khilafat is THE BEST system (we dont even know if its a system or what) why after the death of Prophet SAW, within 50 years, there was NO Khilafat? Why did it end after hazrat Ali when we had many BEST MEN of all times (Sahaba) still alive, at that time? If they could not run Khilafat how can a person after 1500 years is expected to run it?
Cant you find any basis to gain power other then Religion?
Khuda kay liye Khuda kay deen per tars khao aur issay apni Siyasat ki bheent na charhao.
Rest I do not agree with Iqbal on several issues. His own son says that "Subha ka iqbal aur hai aur shaam ka aur".
Iran has never followed Hazrat Umar, Mr Zaid, they are shia and dont prefer hazrat Umar. We are not azzholes. Chakkar na do baba g.
If Hazrat Umar's system was so perfect why immediately after him, hazrat Usman and Hazrat Ali got killed? And that PERFECT SYSTEM was broken into one Monarchy running by Amir Moaaviya and one Khilafat running by hazrta Ali.
Even if we take the hypothesis that like hazrat Umar chose 5 men for Khalifa-to-be, we should do that system now. How would you find a person like Umar NOW who has same level of wisdom and sincerity. Keep in view the fact that not all Sahaba liked Hazrat Umar's committee.
Without democracy, Mr Ziad, how would you elect a Khalifa? Who will decide? YOU? Mulla Umar? Osama bin Ladan? Saudi Shah? Nawaz Shareef? Zardari? Kindly elaborate who will choose Khalifa, what would be the process?
How would you ensure that Khilaafat would result in social justice and it wont become a toy in the hands of Royalty like it was in the 19th century in Turkey and through out the history of Islam.
If Khilafat is THE BEST system (we dont even know if its a system or what) why after the death of Prophet SAW, within 50 years, there was NO Khilafat? Why did it end after hazrat Ali when we had many BEST MEN of all times (Sahaba) still alive, at that time? If they could not run Khilafat how can a person after 1500 years is expected to run it?
Cant you find any basis to gain power other then Religion?
Khuda kay liye Khuda kay deen per tars khao aur issay apni Siyasat ki bheent na charhao.