Now you are talking about some absolutes here, ethics being a part of them of course.
Ethics have some absolutes, and so from absolutes point of view, yes it is indeed a below the line hit.
But then, this hit was intended to whom? somebody who has been doing this and only this all in last 4 5 years? somebody who promoted culture of abuse and intolerance which was not known before. No two wrongs ever made a right, but in this case, this sadistic attitude is worth it.
and really worth it man i tell you.
Ethics have some absolutes, and so from absolutes point of view, yes it is indeed a below the line hit.
But then, this hit was intended to whom? somebody who has been doing this and only this all in last 4 5 years? somebody who promoted culture of abuse and intolerance which was not known before. No two wrongs ever made a right, but in this case, this sadistic attitude is worth it.
and really worth it man i tell you.
I am not ignoring anything. I can understand why you are giddy about this whole even though there is nothing awesome about it as I see it.
I don't get excited about tabloid headlines even if they are true because they are just garbage unless talked about in an intelligent and decent way on how they impact the general public or if a crime is committed.
You are taking too much of a sadistic pleasure in IK's supposed misery in regards to this whole issue some of which was brought upon by himself.
I am making the point that there is nothing awesome about a journalist resorting to social media because he was jilted as his piece was rejected by his editor. Again, it would have helped if you had read umar cheema's article on this issue. There were at least 3-4 places on the internet that this allegedly was attributed to IK with even naming or rather identifying the girl involved. So there was not a net cast by umar and it was certainly not very professional and ethical especially if he did what you thought he did.