Trump will win

[Danish99]

Trump was least pro-war (tough) president in post-WW2 history -- he had won because he campaigned to disengage and focus only on the defense of US, and focus on the internal economic problems - save and protect working class. 40 years of US-China trade policy and wars around the world have destroyed cities and communities.
Don't know who is wise -- the media-heads who watched dismal conditions of US middle class and worker while playing wars and superpower around the world while it slipped to benefit global corporations. Don't like antics and attitude of Trump at all or republican party but what he is standing up for is not so bad for the american people. US needed an outsider in the muk-muka politics of two parties who served the interests of the same donors.

I agree with u on many points but one thing I would like to mention he is the only president who didn,t give a penny to pakistan and it is one of the reason Pakistan,s GDP declined to Zero.Almost every USA president except Trump pumped billions of dallor in Pakistan,s economy.

 

[AWAITED]

×

My prediction is Trump will win US election because of his economic policies. Joe Biden has no economic plan he is totally dependent on left wing politics and popular narratives of main stream media. On ground Trump has delivered and he is better in economic management .
Trump victory will bring a new era of social destruction and instability in USA.

I second you, deep state won't want a civil war in US

 

[Eyeaan]

I agree with u on many points but one thing I would like to mention he is the only president who didn,t give a penny to pakistan and it is one of the reason Pakistan,s GDP declined to Zero.Almost every USA president except Trump pumped billions of dallor in Pakistan,s economy.

That's blessing in disguise - american funding has been a piousness candy. Look what happened to the Kerry-loger civilian funding: billions went into the pockets f the elite and were wasted. US post -911 aid before than in 80s) corruped two generations of pakistan on various levels .
Other than fair trade, from,West/US pak needs not 'indad' but development loans from WB and ADP which are beneficial or favorable terms from IMF whenever needed. These institutions can stop loans on behalf of western countries but their loans are projects specific and well monitored. Not just Pakistan - trump cut military funding to rich Europeans as well, which was his main slogan.

GDP didn't decline because of US - it was direct cyclical results of Nawaz policies - CA balance, declining imports and unbearable volume of loan - adjustments had to happen, that's what zardari had to do when ppp took power in 2008-- and not to forget that this so-called GDP growth was not so real (though upper middle class enjoyed cheap imports) - the losses in trade were more than the gdp growth and net was in the negative -- However added burden of future interest payment was the real price which we had to suffer for this kind of GDP growth.

 

[khipk]

Trump was least pro-war (tough) president in post-WW2 history -- he had won because he campaigned to disengage and focus only on the defense of US, and focus on the internal economic problems - save and protect working class. 40 years of US-China trade policy and wars around the world have destroyed cities and communities.
Don't know who is wise -- the media-heads who watched dismal conditions of US middle class and worker while playing wars and superpower around the world while it slipped to benefit global corporations. Don't like antics and attitude of Trump at all or republican party but what he is standing up for is not so bad for the american people. US needed an outsider in the muk-muka politics of two parties who served the interests of the same donors.

The middle class and the lower class got the worst end of the stick in Trumps era, as is the case with all the recent republican presidents. They just reduce taxes for the rich, and that money is just passed on into the CEOs pocket, as the govt also reduces worker rights. Income disparity always increases under republican rule, infact income disparity in USA is similar to that of Pakistan.. which is quite high

 

[khipk]

That's blessing in disguise - american funding has been a piousness candy. Look what happened to the Kerry-loger civilian funding: billions went into the pockets f the elite and were wasted. US post -911 aid before than in 80s) corruped two generations of pakistan on various levels .
Other than fair trade, from,West/US pak needs not 'indad' but development loans from WB and ADP which are beneficial or favorable terms from IMF whenever needed. These institutions can stop loans on behalf of western countries but their loans are projects specific and well monitored. Not just Pakistan - trump cut military funding to rich Europeans as well, which was his main slogan.

GDP didn't decline because of US - it was direct cyclical results of Nawaz policies - CA balance, declining imports and unbearable volume of loan - adjustments had to happen, that's what zardari had to do when ppp took power in 2008-- and not to forget that this so-called GDP growth was not so real (though upper middle class enjoyed cheap imports) - the losses in trade were more than the gdp growth and net was in the negative -- However added burden of future interest payment was the real price which we had to suffer for this kind of GDP growth.

Naawazs era was a clear example of unstained growth. There was a story in school book about a father leaving two forests to his two sons, first one chopped down all the trees and sold them to become rich, the other one sustained his forest with minimal chopping, in the long run, the first one ran out of money , with nothing to regenerate income..