The Meaning Of Peshawar Anti-CIA Sit-In - by Ahmad Quraishi

[KhanHaripur]

Pakistanis break a psychological barrier. This begins a shift in politics.

AHMED QURAISHI | Monday | 26 April 2011

ISLAMABAD, PakistanA memorable moment came on the second day of the massive anti-CIA and anti-NATO sit-in in Peshawar right next to the Pakistani tribal belt.
As young urban Pakistanis joined their tribal brethren in condemning rogue CIA operations, a Pakistan Army helicopter passed above a sea of participants blocking a route that NATO trucks use to reach Afghanistan. The soldiers waved and smiled as the crowd grew in excitement, according to eyewitness accounts.
It was a coincidence. But the excited crowd took it for something much more. To them, seeing the soldiers waving in approval meant that the cause of hundreds of innocent Pakistanis killed in our tribal belt by CIA drone attacks has the support of a majority of Pakistanis, including the soldiers who waved and smiled at protesters.
And you cant blame the soldiers if they felt excited at seeing this outpour of nationalist sentiments. This was not your typical rent-a-crowd show that Pakistans stagnant political parties master. The young men and women who blocked the NATO supply were not hardened political activists but ordinary Pakistanis who came from their homes for a cause. This crowd represented a raw voice of collective Pakistani conscience, giving a clear verdict on Pakistans 10-year-long involvement with a duplicitous American ally in Afghanistan.
So what did this two-day sit-in by Imran Khan, chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf [Movement for Justice] really achieve?
Heres a summary:
1. For the first time, NATO supplies are blocked by urban Pakistani youth, as opposed to religious militants or the Pakistani government. The US military headquarters at Bagram base and the NATO mission in Afghanistan were rattled by the massive protest across the border in Peshawar. This was the first time since the United States occupied Afghanistan ten years ago that young non-political Pakistanis came down to the streets and blocked NATOs main supply line for three days.
2. Urban, educated and moderate Pakistanis want their government and military to exit Americas disastrous Afghan war. The US government and CIA had successfully created the impression over the years that only extremists oppose the American war in Pakistan. The positive response by Pakistanis to this sit-in has come as a shock to US diplomats here and to US embassys proxy lobby inside our government and some parts of our media.
3. The sit-in signifies a shift in Pakistani politics. Pakistans new generation of young, politically aware new voters are not galvanized by the democratic revenge of President Zardaris PPP, or by the narrow regional politics of ANP, MQM and PMLN [the parties that are currently in power in federal and provincial governments]. The younger Pakistanis whether in Orakzai tribal agency, Karachi, Nowshera or Quetta, are interested only in national politics and refuse divisions. The sit-in, with nationwide support, proves Pakistanis are not divided as self-serving politicians and the countrys foreign ill-wishers contend.
4. Pakistani nationalism is the new name of the game. Pakistanis have tested and tried political parties that espoused a range of ideologies. None worked. Now a new class of aware citizens wants Pakistani politics to be nationalistic and independent.
5. Finally, the best evidence of all of the above is the party behind this event, Imran Khans PTI. This party, which did not even run in the 2008 elections and was dismissed as a one-man show, managed to create excitement among the most influential segment of Pakistani voters, the youth. Probably no other party can pull as many urban and educated middle- and lower-middle-class Pakistanis from across the nation with this level of excitement as PTI did. Endorsing this new development, several more established parties and politicians rushed to join the sit-in.
The last time Pakistanis showed a unified nationalist public outpour was after the devastating November 2005 earthquake in Kashmir and northern Pakistan. After that, ordinary Pakistanis became demoralized as they watched their governments enchain the nation to foreign agendas and destroy the countrys political and economic stability. The sit-in marks a return to that landmark national unity that we missed for six years.
An important psychological barrier has been crossed in Pakistan. This sit-in has targeted NATO, CIA and the US this time. Chances are it would be the Presidency and Parliament next.
Mr. Quraishi, from the PakNationalists Political Action Committee, launched a WE SUPPORT campaign to rally young Pakistanis behind PTIs Peshawar sit-in.

2007-2011. All rights reserved. Paknationalists.com
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium
without royalty provided this notice is preserved.​

 

[jerry719964]

Army soldiers in chopper waving towards the dharna protestors

At dharna an army chopper passed above the participant at dharna and The soldiers waved and smiled as the crowd grew in excitement, according to eyewitness accounts.and AHMED QURAISHI a Journalist also mentioned this in his coloumn

 

[jerry719964]

The Meaning Of Peshawar Anti-CIA Sit-In ( A column by Ahmad quraishi )

The Meaning Of Peshawar Anti-CIA Sit-In
Pakistanis break a psychological barrier. This begins a shift in politics.
AHMED QURAISHI | Monday | 26 April 2011
WWW.PAKNATIONALISTS.COM
ISLAMABAD, PakistanA memorable moment came on the second day of the massive anti-CIA and anti-NATO sit-in in Peshawar right next to the Pakistani tribal belt.
As young urban Pakistanis joined their tribal brethren in condemning rogue CIA operations, a Pakistan Army helicopter passed above a sea of participants blocking a route that NATO trucks use to reach Afghanistan. The soldiers waved and smiled as the crowd grew in excitement, according to eyewitness accounts.
It was a coincidence. But the excited crowd took it for something much more. To them, seeing the soldiers waving in approval meant that the cause of hundreds of innocent Pakistanis killed in our tribal belt by CIA drone attacks has the support of a majority of Pakistanis, including the soldiers who waved and smiled at protesters.
And you cant blame the soldiers if they felt excited at seeing this outpour of nationalist sentiments. This was not your typical rent-a-crowd show that Pakistans stagnant political parties master. The young men and women who blocked the NATO supply were not hardened political activists but ordinary Pakistanis who came from their homes for a cause. This crowd represented a raw voice of collective Pakistani conscience, giving a clear verdict on Pakistans 10-year-long involvement with a duplicitous American ally in Afghanistan.
So what did this two-day sit-in by Imran Khan, chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf [Movement for Justice] really achieve?
Heres a summary:
1. For the first time, NATO supplies are blocked by urban Pakistani youth, as opposed to religious militants or the Pakistani government. The US military headquarters at Bagram base and the NATO mission in Afghanistan were rattled by the massive protest across the border in Peshawar. This was the first time since the United States occupied Afghanistan ten years ago that young non-political Pakistanis came down to the streets and blocked NATOs main supply line for three days.
2. Urban, educated and moderate Pakistanis want their government and military to exit Americas disastrous Afghan war. The US government and CIA had successfully created the impression over the years that only extremists oppose the American war in Pakistan. The positive response by Pakistanis to this sit-in has come as a shock to US diplomats here and to US embassys proxy lobby inside our government and some parts of our media.
3. The sit-in signifies a shift in Pakistani politics. Pakistans new generation of young, politically aware new voters are not galvanized by the democratic revenge of President Zardaris PPP, or by the narrow regional politics of ANP, MQM and PMLN [the parties that are currently in power in federal and provincial governments]. The younger Pakistanis whether in Orakzai tribal agency, Karachi, Nowshera or Quetta, are interested only in national politics and refuse divisions. The sit-in, with nationwide support, proves Pakistanis are not divided as self-serving politicians and the countrys foreign ill-wishers contend.
4. Pakistani nationalism is the new name of the game. Pakistanis have tested and tried political parties that espoused a range of ideologies. None worked. Now a new class of aware citizens wants Pakistani politics to be nationalistic and independent.
5. Finally, the best evidence of all of the above is the party behind this event, Imran Khans PTI. This party, which did not even run in the 2008 elections and was dismissed as a one-man show, managed to create excitement among the most influential segment of Pakistani voters, the youth. Probably no other party can pull as many urban and educated middle- and lower-middle-class Pakistanis from across the nation with this level of excitement as PTI did. Endorsing this new development, several more established parties and politicians rushed to join the sit-in.
The last time Pakistanis showed a unified nationalist public outpour was after the devastating November 2005 earthquake in Kashmir and northern Pakistan. After that, ordinary Pakistanis became demoralized as they watched their governments enchain the nation to foreign agendas and destroy the countrys political and economic stability. The sit-in marks a return to that landmark national unity that we missed for six years.
An important psychological barrier has been crossed in Pakistan. This sit-in has targeted NATO, CIA and the US this time. Chances are it would be the Presidency and Parliament next.
Mr. Quraishi, from the PakNationalists Political Action Committee, launched a WE SUPPORT campaign to rally young Pakistanis behind PTIs Peshawar sit-in.

 

[Raaz]

Re: The Meaning Of Peshawar Anti-CIA Sit-In ( A column by Ahmad quraishi )

Hopefully this spirit will increase. one day , people could kick out this corrupt government.