How does BIDDAT differ from IJTIHAD?
Some people object to commemorating the Mawlid on account of misunderstanding the Hadth of Bid`a.
`Irbd ibn Sriya (radiyallhu `anhu) relates that the Holy Prophet (sallallhu `alayhi wa sallam) stated:
وإياكم ومحدثات الأمور فإن كل محدثة بدعة وكل بدعة ضلالة
The understanding of this Hadth according to the classical scholars of Hadth of the past is very different to what certain quarters lead us to believe in these troubled times. The classical Hadth master, Mull `Al al-Qr [d. 1014] explains this Hadth:
“It means, every ‘bid`a WHICH IS BAD (sayyi'ah) is misguidance’ because he (`alayhis-saltu was-salm) stated: ‘who so ever innovates a good innovation in Islam will get the rewards of it and the rewards of those who practice it after.’ Examples of this are the compiling of the Qur'an by Ab Bakr and `Umar, having it writing in the form of a [one volume] book by Zayd and reviving it in the era of `Uthmn.”
(`Al Qr, Mirqt Sharh Mishkt, 1:216)
Imam Shfi`. Imm Shfi` divided bid`a (innovation) into the two basic categories:
قال الشافعي المحدثات من الأمور ضربان ما احدث يخالف كتابا او سنة او اثرا او اجماعا فهذه البدعة ضلالة وما احدث من الخير لا خلاف فيه لواحد من هذا فهذه محدثة غير مذمومة قد قال عمر في قيام رمضان نعمت البدعة هذه يعني انها محدثة لم تكن واذ كانت فليس فيها رد لما مضى
“Innovated matters are of two kinds (al-muHdathtu minal-umri Darbn): one is an innovation that contravenes (m uHditha yukhlifu) some-thing in the Qur'n or the Sunna or a Companion-report (athar) or the Consensus (ijm`): that innovation is misguidance (fahdhihil-bid`atu Dalla). The other kind is the innovation of any and all good things (m uHditha minal-khayr) contravening none of the above, and this is a blameless innovation (wahdhihi muHdathatun ghayru madhmma). `Umar said, concerning the prayers of Ramadn: ‘What a fine bid`a this is!’* meaning that it was innovated without having existed before and, even so, there was nothing in it that contradicted the above.”
(Dhahab, Siyar a`lmun-nubal', 8:408)
“Whoever innovates a good innovation in Islam has its reward and the reward of those who would practice upon it until the Day of Judgement - without lessening the rewards of those who practice with it. The one who innovates the innovation of misguidance, would take the sin for it and the sin of those who practice upon it until the Day of Judgement--without lessening the sin of those who practice with it.”
Ali Qari's explaination of Hadeeths is invalid as it is against many authentic hadeeths listed below. Ali Qari has no right to add "WHICH IS BAD" to the above hadeeth. Should we follow the instruction of Ali Qari or clear instruction of our beloved prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم)?
Al-Haafidh Ibn Rajab said in his commentary to al Arba'een: 'So his (صلى الله عليه وسلم) statement, "Every innovation is misguidance" is from the all encompassing word, not excluding from it anything. And it is the greatest principle from the principles of the Religion. And it is associated with his (صلى الله عليه وسلم) statement, "Whoever invents in this affair of ours, what is not from it, then it is rejected" So whoever invents things and attributes them to the religion, and it does not have an origin in the religion to return to, then it is misguidance, and the Religion is free from those things. And equal to that are matters of beliefs, or actions, or statements whether hidden, or manifest.' [Jaami'ul 'Uloom Wal Hikam, p. 233]
The statement of 'Umar radiallaahu 'anhu "What a good innovation", he desires the linguistic innovation, and not the religious innovation (al bida'atush Shar'iyyah). So whatever has an origin in the law, returns to it. If it is said that it is an innovation, then it is an innovation in language, and not in Islaamic Law. So the religious innovation is what does not have an origin for it to return to. So the collecting of the Qur`an into one book has for it an origin in the law to return to, because the Prophet sallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam had commanded the recording of the Qur`aan, but it was written scattered so the Companions collected it into one book for it's protection. Indeed the Prophet prayed taraaweeh with his Companions radiallaahu 'anhum nightly, and they had preferable fear about it in the appointment [of an Imaam], and the continuing of the Companions radiallaahu 'anhum in praying in separate groups in the lifetime of the Prophet and after his sallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam passing, up until 'Umar Ibnul Khattaab united them on one Imaam like how they used to be behind the Prophet sallaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and this is not an innovation in the Religion.
There is a story behind this hadeeth, which will explain what "whoever starts a good thing" means. Imaam Muslim reported this story from Jareer ibn 'Abdullaah, who also narrated the hadeeth itself. He said: "Some people from the Bedouin came to the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), wearing woollen garments. He saw that they were in bad shape and in desperate need, so he urged the people to give them charity. They people were very slow to respond, and it could be seen in his face (that he was upset). Then a man of the Ansaar brought a package of silver, then another came, and another and another, and his face was filled with joy. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: 'Whoever starts a good thing in Islam, and others do likewise after him, there will be written for him a reward like that of those who followed him, without it detracting in the least from their reward. Whoever starts a bad thing in Islam, and others do likewise after him, there will be written for him a burden of sin like that of those who followed him, without it detracting in the least from their burden.'"
(Reported by Muslim, no. 1017)
The Sahba never performed the prayer of Tarwh in congregation for more than 3 days in a row prior to this event. So it is the sunna of the companions to accept good innovations and reject bad ones.
Ahle-biddat (اہل بدعت) usually present Tarawih prayer as an example to justify their acts of biddat (بدعت). As far as Tarawih is concerned, it was not something invented in the religion, it was the sunnah and Sahabah (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) used to pray with more than one Jammat. Hazrat Umer (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) simply organized it into one Jammat. For example, early Quraan did not contain dots or short vowel markings on the letters and words. Dots were put as syntactical marks by Abu Al-Aswad Al Doaly, during the time of Mu'awiya Ibn Abi Sufian (661-680 CE). The letters were marked with different dotting by Nasr Ibn Asem and Hayy ibn Ya'amor, during the time of Abd Al-Malek Ibn Marawan (685-705 CE). A complete system of diacritical marks (damma, fataha, kasra) was invented by Al Khaleel Ibn Ahmad Al Faraheedy (d. 786 CE). This innovation will not be called biddat as adding dots or short vowel markings just enhanced the readability of Qur'aan for non-Arabs.
On the other hand, celebrating the Birthday of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) is biddat (بدعت) as neither our beloved prophet celebrated the his(صلى الله عليه وسلم) or anybody birthday , nor Sahabah (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ), after the death of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم), celebrated birthday of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم).
Could anybody from bidatti (بدعتی) group tell me how many biddat (بدعت) invented by Sahabah (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) after the death of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) their biddat is included in Sahih Sitta books? Are Muslim after the death of Sahabah (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) become more capable of creating biddat then Sahaba (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ)??
Biddat (بدعت) is also against the spirit of Islam. If you allow innovations in religion then there wouldn't be any limit to the addition of new sects to Islam.
Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: Abu Bakr As-Siddiq sent for me when the people! of Yamama had been killed (i.e., a number of the Prophet's Companions who fought against Musailama). (I went to him) and found 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sitting with him. Abu Bakr then said (to me), "Umar has come to me and said: "Casualties were heavy among the Qurra' of the! Qur'an (i.e. those who knew the quran by heart) on the day of the Battle of Yalmama, and I am afraid that more heavy casualties may take place among the Qurra' on other battlefields, whereby a large part of the Qur'an may be lost. Therefore I suggest, you (Abu Bakr) order that the Qur'an be collected." I said to 'Umar, "How can you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" 'Umar said, "By Allah, that is a good project. "Umar kept on urging me to accept his proposal till Allah opened my chest for it and I began to realize the good in the idea which 'Umar had realized." Then Abu Bakr said (to me). 'You are a wise young man and we do not have any suspicion about you, and you used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle. So you should search for (the fragmentary scripts of) the Qur'an and collect it in one book)." By Allah If they had ordered me to shift one of the mountains, it would not have been heavier for me than this ordering me to collect the Qur'an. Then I said to Abu Bakr, "How will you do something which Allah's Apostle did not do?" Abu Bakr replied, "By Allah, it is a good project." Abu Bakr kept on urging me to accept his idea until Allah opened my chest for what He had opened the chests of Abu Bakr and 'Umar. So I started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who knew it by heart, till I found the last Verse of Surat At-Tauba (Repentance) with Abi Khuzaima Al-Ansari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him. The Verse is: 'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves. It grieves him that you should receive any injury or difficulty..(till the end of Surat-Baraa' (At-Tauba) (9.128-129) Then the complete manuscripts (copy) of the Qur'an remained with Abu Bakr till he died, then with 'Umar till the end of his life, and then with Hafsa, the daughter of 'Umar. (Sahih Bukhari, Book #61, Hadith #509)
Lesson learned from above Hadeeth: Hazrat Abu Bakr (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) were so afraid of doing anything which is not done by our beloved Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) that initially he even resisted in compilation of Quraan. Just think about it without any bias, why were Hazrat Abu Bakr (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) initially against the compilation of Quraan?? The answer is very simple, because he (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) did not want to be a biddati (innovator into religion). when Hazrat Umer (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) explained that this act (compilation of Quraan) does not come under the defination of Biddat only then he (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) agreed to proceed.
This Hadeeth also explain the reason why any of Sahah (رَّضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ) did not celebrate the birthday of Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم), did not ever do Sijda to any Qabar, did not ever celbrated Shab-e-barat, did not build domes on graves...etc, etc.
May Allah give hidayat to my bidatti (بدعتی) Muslim brothers who think that they are more capable of innovating new ways of ibadat which our beloved Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) were not able to teach us, Nauzobillah (Aameen)..
There are so many mistakes in this, I don't know where to start.
To start with, you have contradicted yourself by saying that Milad is not allowed because the Holy Prophet (s) did not do it. You forget that he (s) did not:
- perform Tarawih prayers more than 3 days in a row which is why `Umar called it "ni`mal-bid`a - very good bid`a". Now do you understand the meaning of the word bid`a better than `Umar?
- The Qur'an was NEVER compiled into a 1 volume book by the Prophet (s) but it was a bid`a that was accepted.
- The Prophet (s) NEVER put vowels (dots) on any Qur'anic letter. It was done later and hence was a bid`a hasana.
Our Prophet (s) taught us that good bida` are accepted and bad ones rejected and this is the understanding of Islam given by all of the classical scholars of Islam before the Saudi American ones.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|