Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, son of Jewish parents, French Report ISIL Leader Mossad Agent

Londonguy

Senator (1k+ posts)
Simon Elliot, aka Al-Baghdadi, son of Jewish parents, Mossad agent



In French


Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, so-called ”Caliph,” the head of ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant is, according to sources reputed to originate from Edward Snowden, an actor named Elliot Shimon, a Mossad trained operative.

Simon Elliot (Elliot Shimon) aka Al-Baghdadi was born of two Jewish parents and is a Mossad agent.
We offer below three translations that want to assert that the Caliph Al-Baghdadi is a full Mossad agent and that he was born Jewish father and mother:

The real name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is “Simon Elliott.”
The so-called “Elliot” was recruited by the Israeli Mossad and was trained in espionage and psychological warfare against Arab and Islamic societies.

This information was attributed to Edward Snowden and published by newspapers and other Web sites: the head of the “Islamic State” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, has cooperated with the U.S. Secret Service, British and Israel to create an organization capable of attracting terrorist extremists from around the world.

Source: Radio ajyal.com
Another source corroborates this statement, the site Egy-press:
With photo support, a Iranian media discovers the true identity of the Emir Daash, a trained Zionist agent.

Iranian intelligence discovered the true and full identity of the Emir Daash, which is known under the name Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi; his real name is Elliot Shimon. Its role in Mossad secret agent in the Zionist espionage. His false name: Ibrahim ibn Awad ibn Ibrahim Al Al Badri Arradoui Hoseini.
The plan: get into the military and civilian heart of the countries that are declared as a threat to Israel in order to destroy to facilitate thereafter, the takeover by the Zionist state on the entire area of the Middle East in order to establish Greater Israel.

Here are the borders of the Zionist project, the “Greater Israel” or “Eretz Israel” for short.
These facts confirm the first that came out a few days ago, confirming that the Caliph Rolex is sent to Israel to sow chaos in neighboring countries the Zionist entity. Please note that EIIL announced it a few days ago that, to want to now take the “barbarians Jews”, a reference to Zionists besiege Gaza.

Practice! Having devastated the area of Israel, it will now allow the Americans and the Israelis to show the fingers as bloody terrorists to shoot at faster to defend the Zionist state, while the same let them proliferate and act with impunity for over two months now. Prepare a project they probably from the famous Arab Spring with the destabilization of Iraq, Sudan, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria and Mali (among others). Clever!

Source

PS I SUGGEST all of you Google the Name Simon Elliott or Shimon Elliott Countless websites are now carrying the same as above.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:

khomeini

Councller (250+ posts)
Reality discovered by iranian news agency with the help of a photoshop picture [hilar] [hilar] Sub choro, bum phoro Yeh dekho aur dil jalao

Libyan people go crazy when they see an IS soldier among them
(Chanting - Come to battlefield you coward Libyan Army)
[video]http://tune.pk/edit_video.php?vid=4479067[/video]
 
Last edited:

KhanHaripur

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
you are a known KAZZAB who have been caught lying before & now spreading fake photoshoped images.

[h=1]Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi[/h]People of Samarra know him & his family he was a Cleric in Ahmad ibn Hanbal Mosque in Samarra even before America Invaded Iraq and holder of Master's degree and a PhD in Islamic studies from the University of Islamic Sciences in the Baghdad.

You can lie lie and lie.lakin jhoot k paon nahi hotay.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi
 
Last edited:

jimz84

Senator (1k+ posts)
you are a known KAZZAB who have been caught lying before & now spreading fake photoshoped images.
How come you are so sure about him that he is muslim and real man?? Have you spend your childhood days with him??.. Thread starter has provided links and refrences that shows he is jews agent... Can you provide any authentic link or any other news any other thing which can prove your point of view that he is not agent??
 

KhanHaripur

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
How come you are so sure about him that he is muslim and real man?? Have you spend your childhood days with him??.. Thread starter has provided links and refrences that shows he is jews agent... Can you provide any authentic link or any other news any other thing which can prove your point of view that he is not agent??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi


other websites are saying its a conspiracy theory,how come the people from his Family/city Supports him and the KAZZABS from other countries accuse him of being a JEW.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/isis-leade...hdadi-mossad-agent-born-jewish-parents-606213
 
Last edited:

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
​Wikipedia is not an academic source even I can go and edit it, if you give it as source for a research paper you will fail your degree, and here you are providing it to support your claim of someone being Khalifa. Pathetic to say the least. Also you linked it to be a conspiracy theory, theory means it can be true or false. So you Admit that it can be true that he is a Jewish agent.
More dangerous than a person who has no clue what he is supporting is a person who is confused and has very little information in his favour because that sort of person will misguide and confuse everyone. You are that person.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Bakr_al-Baghdadi


other websites are saying its a conspiracy theory,how come the people from his Family/city Supports him and the KAZZABS from other countries accuse him of being a JEW.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/isis-leade...hdadi-mossad-agent-born-jewish-parents-606213
 

modern.fakir

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Yes Caliph Bagdhadi al Amreeki wal Yehudi [hilar][hilar] ...I knew it all along without any research ...because OUR AKKA pbuh had informed us about them 1400 years ago !:biggthumpup:
 
Last edited:

KhanHaripur

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
​Wikipedia is not an academic source even I can go and edit it, if you give it as source for a research paper you will fail your degree, and here you are providing it to support your claim of someone being Khalifa. Pathetic to say the least. Also you linked it to be a conspiracy theory, theory means it can be true or false. So you Admit that it can be true that he is a Jewish agent.
More dangerous than a person who has no clue what he is supporting is a person who is confused and has very little information in his favour because that sort of person will misguide and confuse everyone. You are that person.

if i would have given ISIS official link you would have rejected aswell seems like you will only believe if i give a link created by yourself :lol:
i have said it before and saying again.The people of his hometown SAMARRA know him since he was born in 1971,was a Imam in the Masjid & holds a PHD in Islamic studies from the University of Islamic Sciences in the Baghdad.All you need is go to SAMARRA and ask the locals rather believing some unknown source.
 

Vitamin_C

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Oh don't give me this bullSh!t, I do not rely on heresay, the followers of Hazrat Musa(R.A) and Hazrat Isa(R.A) went astray just like you because of believing heresay. I can give you detailed documented information about the life of my role model Prophet Muhammad(P.B.U.H) from childhood. Even though this was over 1400 years ago.
Can you give me one documented evidence of what Baghdadi did before 2003?
Any school certificates? Any diploma or degree from Iraq? Any birth Certificate? Any proof video/audio/written that he was imam at mosque.

if i would have given ISIS official link you would have rejected aswell seems like you will only believe if i give a link created by yourself :lol:
i have said it before and saying again.The people of his hometown SAMARRA know him since he was born in 1971,was a Imam in the Masjid & holds a PHD in Islamic studies from the University of Islamic Sciences in the Baghdad.All you need is go to SAMARRA and ask the locals rather believing some unknown source.
 

Londonguy

Senator (1k+ posts)

Can you give me one documented evidence of what Baghdadi did before 2003?
Any school certificates? Any diploma or degree from Iraq? Any birth Certificate? Any proof video/audio/written that he was imam at mosque.

What remains is what the media provides about the details of Al-Baghdadi's life and his detention by US forces in Iraq for four years before being released in 2009; all are based on interpretations and speculations since neither the Iraqi nor US authorities have confirmed that information.Furthermore, the Iraqi authorities claimed not to have any information on Al-Baghdadi, even after the organisation announced his full name on Sunday.

Source
 

Londonguy

Senator (1k+ posts)
The Pretender-Caliph and Islamic History: The Truth about Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Asma Afsaruddin

So Muslims of the twenty-first century have a caliph, do they? According to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the abolition of the caliphate in 1924 has now been reversed and the institution has been revived after an interregnum of ninety years.

The new caliph is even called Abu Bakr, just like the first leader of the Muslim community who assumed office after the death of the Prophet Muhammad.
This twenty-first century caliph also comes adorned with a self-proclaimed affiliation with the Quraysh, the Prophet's natal tribe (although his last name, al-Baghdadi, betrays a non-Meccan origin). Moreover, he fights ruthlessly and butchers all those who stand in his way. He gives no quarter to his enemies and there is no satiating his blood-lust - all in the name of jihad.

After all, isn't that how a Muslim caliph should comport himself?

Yes, indeed, but only if the job description was written by a career Islamophobe, of which there are plenty these days. Now add to the list our current pretender-caliph. Although the likes of Pamela Geller and Frank Gaffney have done plenty to besmirch the image of Muslims and all their cherished historical shibboleths (umma, jihad and yes, the caliphate), no one could have done a better hatchet job than al-Baghdadi.

What would happen if we wrote the job description for the caliphate based on history instead? Here goes.
The original Arabic sources which discuss the qualifications of the individual best suited for the office of the caliph emphasize the following traits: generosity, truthfulness, courage and, most importantly, superior knowledge, both religious and worldly. Abu Bakr, the first historical caliph, had these traits in abundance, as did the three remaining caliphs who are collectively called "the Rightly-Guided Caliphs." The first caliph's epithet was al-Siddiq, the "Truthful" which he earned on account of his unflinching honesty and devotion to the truth.
And how was Abu Bakr al-Siddiq proclaimed caliph? As the sources inform us, a crowd of Muslims gathered in Medina to discuss the selection of a successor to the Prophet immediately after his death. They debated the respective qualifications of the two primary candidates for the office of the caliph - Abu Bakr and 'Ali, the Prophet's cousin. The 60-plus year old Abu Bakr won out over the roughly thirty-three year old 'Ali mainly on account of his greater maturity and the greater wisdom that came with it, for they were otherwise equally generous, truthful and courageous.

This process of consultative decision-making, known as shura in Arabic, is prescribed in the Qur'an and was practiced abundantly by the Prophet himself. Following this consultative process, the crowd offered their allegiance to Abu Bakr - another important act known in Arabic as bay'a, which confers legitimacy on the leader. In subsequent political and communal decisions made by the Rightly-Guided caliphs, these twin concepts of consultation (shura) and the offering of public allegiance (bay'a) by the people became enshrined as foundational principles for the legitimate governance of the Muslim community.

Upon his election, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq made it clear that he remained accountable to the people in a speech that has surely become one of the most famous in the annals of Islamic history. According to the well-known author from the ninth century al-Jahiz, Abu Bakr addressed the crowd thus: "Indeed I am a follower, not an innovator; if I perform well, then help me, and if I should deviate, correct me."
Abu Bakr then went on to assert that the caliphate was deserved only on the basis of moral excellence; kinship to the Prophet or tribal affiliation (such as descent from the Quraysh tribe) was of no consequence whatsoever. His address has justly become a model of humility and moral accountability to the people that is meant to set a gold standard for political conduct in the Islamic milieu.
Fast forward to fourteen centuries later and let us compare the historical situation of the seventh century with the contemporary one. There is no doubt that al-Baghdadi did a bit of homework before anointing himself caliph. In a sermon he gave at the Grand Mosque in Mosul, Iraq on Friday, 4 July (the sixth of Ramadan), he cited part of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq's speech. He repeated the section about asking the people to correct him if he should go astray but, significantly, left out the part about the caliph being "a follower, not an innovator." He also failed to mention that the people had a very important role in electing their caliph and that they had the right to be consulted in such matters before his appointment. Instead al-Baghdadi proclaimed thunderously that "I have been appointed [caliph] over you, even though I am not the best and the most morally excellent among you."

With this last assertion, he brought the whole edifice of the Sunni caliphate crashing down over him, by mocking the very ideals that are supposed to shore it up. As history tells us, the caliph, also known as the Commander of the Faithful (a title dutifully adopted by al-Baghdadi), is expected to be consensually elected by the people or by their representatives (as in an electoral council) and he must be acknowledged to be the most morally excellent of his time. This is the documented Sunni position with regard to a legitimate caliphate, even as history took a different turn and dynastic rule set in.

So when al-Baghdadi confessed that "I have been appointed over you," he spectacularly thumbed his nose at the principles of consultation and public allegiance that undergird the earliest legitimate caliphate.
That means he is one of two other kinds of rulers who emerged in history who do not depend on shura and bay'a for their legitimacy. The first would be a mere worldly king, who simply wants the trappings of political power and rules absolutely and tyrannically over his subjects. Such a king is designated in Arabic as malik, a pejorative term which immediately brands the individual as an illegitimate usurper of political power, for he rules his people without their consent. The Umayyad rulers who came to power after the "Rightly-Guided" caliphate in the late seventh century without instituting any process of election were therefore contemptuously dismissed as mere "kings" by official historians, despite their conscious adoption of the title of caliph.
The second possibility is that al-Baghdadi considers himself appointed by God, a status that no Sunni caliph could ever openly entertain. From the viewpoint of Sunni political theory, such a claim would make him the equivalent of a Shi'i imam or religious leader. In contrast to the Sunnis, the Shi'a did come to believe in the divine appointment of their leaders which, by definition, was not subject to the processes of consultation and ratification by the people. It is very likely that this is the model al-Baghadi is emulating. Given ISIS's loathing for the Shi'a, such an assertion is richly ironical and confirms the old adage that a little learning is always a dangerous thing!
Most Muslims have received al-Baghdadi's proclamation - when they are aware of it - with supreme apathy. This should come as no surprise. Al-Baghdadi can keep touting himself as the new caliph, but most Muslims know enough about their own history to recognize him for what he is - a murderous tyrant using religion as a cheap armour to acquire rank political power.
Kingly pretensions were never part of the real caliph Abu Bakr al-Siddiq's image. The current indifference and revulsion of the majority of Muslims towards the pretender-caliph speaks to their resolve not to take part in the degradation of that image and to keep the hope alive that political governance in their societies will continue to be based on consultation and the consent of the people. These principles constitute the true legacy of the historical caliphate and can easily translate into modern democratic systems - a point that a number of Muslims are now energetically making.




Asma Afsaruddin is Professor of Islamic Studies and Chairperson of the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures at Indiana University, Bloomington. She is the author of several books, including Excellence and Precedence: Medieval Islamic Discourse on Legitimate Leadership, The First Muslims: History and Memory, and the recently publishedStriving in the Path of God: Jihad and Martyrdom in Islamic Thought.

You can also read the perspective of Samina Yasmeen, Director at the Centre for Muslim States and Societies at the University of Western Australia. Professor Yasmeen featured on last week's Religion and Ethics Report on RN.
 
Last edited:

mkiani

Senator (1k+ posts)
Dajaal is PhD in deception and Muslims are child like and have blindfolded themselves to play hide and seek at the hands of enemy of Allah.Alas.
 

Back
Top