This!
Do you know that the studies with outright negative or outlandish, cooked results also get highly cited. In negation. So citation index is not directly proportional to the strength of results, always.
Do you know that your pubmed article is a popular science review, sponsored by not any scientific lab but a media deptt., where the author discusses the changing views towards the, again, ass-umed gay gene and its paraphrenelia?
Do you know you're scientifically discussing, the holy grail of male homosexuality industry?
Do you know that you're, again, showing how bifurcated your so-called morality scale is when, you keep misquoting, misinterpreting and misconstruing religion to support your pet notion about the tortures on female slaves, yet you hardly seem to be bothered by the lack of mention of a lesbian gene in the holy science texts that you're shoving around?
Do they know?
Do you know that the studies with outright negative or outlandish, cooked results also get highly cited. In negation. So citation index is not directly proportional to the strength of results, always.
Do you know that your pubmed article is a popular science review, sponsored by not any scientific lab but a media deptt., where the author discusses the changing views towards the, again, ass-umed gay gene and its paraphrenelia?
Do you know you're scientifically discussing, the holy grail of male homosexuality industry?
Do you know that you're, again, showing how bifurcated your so-called morality scale is when, you keep misquoting, misinterpreting and misconstruing religion to support your pet notion about the tortures on female slaves, yet you hardly seem to be bothered by the lack of mention of a lesbian gene in the holy science texts that you're shoving around?
Do they know?
Sure but also check the number of citations. Articles with more citations tend to be more credible than ones with few or no citations.