Power Lunch 1st October 2015 - Army Angry on Nawaz Sharif Speech in UN

[Asim Rana]

 

[Hussain1967]

Why Army should be angry on PM's speech in UN? Nawaz said almost all the things that Raheel said on September 6? What Raheel didn't say was the withdrawal of forces from Siachin and agreement of not waging war against each other along LOC. I think both these statements of Nawaz Sharif should be welcomed as it might reduce rising tension between two neighbors.

 

[Anmir]

Nawaz SHARIFF should have HIGHLIGHTED India of sponsoring state terror and breaking the working boundary and the loss of life and property. He should have mentioned the state of Islamic countries where countries were interfering into internal affairs that were evolving due to excesses of their leaders over the previous century.
MIANS message was as NON effective as what has been given over the last sixty years barring BHUTTOS message to the world in the seventies. PAKISTAN IS AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRYAND ITS ABOUT TIME THE WORLD ACKNOWLEDGED THE SEVERE LOSS OF LIFE RUNNING IN EXCESS OF SIXTY THOUSAND THROUGH THE HANDS OF SPONSORED TERRORISTS AND SOMEONE ELSES FREEDOM FIGHTERS..
MODI THROUGH HIS HYPOCRACY OF SEEKING BENGALI LOVE FINALLY ADMITTED TO THE ROLE THE HINDHUS PLAYED IN THE DEMISE OF EAST PAKISTAN .THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN HAMMERED HOME BUT THEN AGAIN CAN WE EXPECT THAT FROM MIAN SAAB