Hunain Khalid
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
- Featured Thumbs
- https://i.imgur.com/wMTWf0l.jpg
Last edited:
Not a good idea,
Don't increase it but don't withdraw what is already given.
Poor people Travel on it.
By the way Metros are poorly planned e.g. in twin cities it just cover one route and lucky are those who have home and working place near the metro.
Easily network of good transportation could have planned in same amount.
What about Imran 's Metro???Your argument supports the removal of subsidy itself!! You subsidize something to benefit whole community! Not a certain segment. e.g. subsidy on sugar benefits poor all over the country!
This metro was a commission and vote gathering stunt by showbaz! If poor can't afford it, they shouldn't ride it! And it means it was feasible to be built from day 1..!!
Your argument supports the removal of subsidy itself!! You subsidize something to benefit whole community! Not a certain segment. e.g. subsidy on sugar benefits poor all over the country!
This metro was a commission and vote gathering stunt by showbaz! If poor can't afford it, they shouldn't ride it! And it means it was feasible to be built from day 1..!!
Then why PTI built it in KPK and that too in more than 70 Billion rupees. If PML(N) can do with corruption in 30 billion then how PTI is building in 70 Billion without corruption.Your argument supports the removal of subsidy itself!! You subsidize something to benefit whole community! Not a certain segment. e.g. subsidy on sugar benefits poor all over the country!
This metro was a commission and vote gathering stunt by showbaz! If poor can't afford it, they shouldn't ride it! And it means it was feasible to be built from day 1..!!
Great decision by Imran khan
Great decision by Imran khanWhat about Imran 's Metro???
Great decision by Imran khanVery good decision
What about Imran 's Metro???
Then why PTI built it in KPK and that too in more than 70 Billion rupees. If PML(N) can do with corruption in 30 billion then how PTI is building in 70 Billion without corruption.
Not a good idea,
Don't increase it but don't withdraw what is already given.
Poor people Travel on it.
By the way Metros are poorly planned e.g. in twin cities it just cover one route and lucky are those who have home and working place near the metro.
Easily network of good transportation could have planned in same amount.
Lol KPK government won't give subsidy.Then why PTI built it in KPK and that too in more than 70 Billion rupees. If PML(N) can do with corruption in 30 billion then how PTI is building in 70 Billion without corruption.
Your argument supports the removal of subsidy itself!! You subsidize something to benefit whole community! Not a certain segment. e.g. subsidy on sugar benefits poor all over the country!
This metro was a commission and vote gathering stunt by showbaz! If poor can't afford it, they shouldn't ride it! And it means it was feasible to be built from day 1..!!