Taimur.javed
Senator (1k+ posts)
It looks to Pakistanis that Mush won and trashed the rascal anchor and Indians would say the anchor beat mush but it seems to me that both parties came out bad, musharraf seemed like a person in denial and anchor a cheerleader douche bag of indian military.
If I was mush, I would've factually destroyed the anchor. 1st of all for him to come up and say I don't have facts and don't know much about the issue was very dumb. The message that sends is that mush knows nothing and is just passing gas on tv while the compare has all facts so he is right. Mush should've been prepared about the issue and then he could've made the compare look like a fool.
Like e.g., the anchor kept saying that indian army stand is proven by hard facts, mush should've asked him what facts. Its your word against ours. Secondly the anchor said that India has won diplomatically and Pakistan has to be on defensive, I would've asked him how so. Mush should've asked him counter questions to see what that idiot is boasting about rather than crying about East Pakistan etc etc.
And lastly, in one sentence the compare says that Pakistan army wants to escalate against India and in next he says Pakistan army recently changed its green book to say internal threats are #1 priority. These are contradictory things. This negates his first earlier assertion.
Finally about Hafiz Saeed, there is no evidence (as per my knowledge) that HS was involved directly or indirectly in Mumbai attacks. Because he heads JUD (which is not a militant organization) he cannot be thought of as complacent in the attacks. He is not a proven criminal in the court of law.
All in all, Mush should've been prepared on the issue and would've brought counter points to defend his point of view.
If I was mush, I would've factually destroyed the anchor. 1st of all for him to come up and say I don't have facts and don't know much about the issue was very dumb. The message that sends is that mush knows nothing and is just passing gas on tv while the compare has all facts so he is right. Mush should've been prepared about the issue and then he could've made the compare look like a fool.
Like e.g., the anchor kept saying that indian army stand is proven by hard facts, mush should've asked him what facts. Its your word against ours. Secondly the anchor said that India has won diplomatically and Pakistan has to be on defensive, I would've asked him how so. Mush should've asked him counter questions to see what that idiot is boasting about rather than crying about East Pakistan etc etc.
And lastly, in one sentence the compare says that Pakistan army wants to escalate against India and in next he says Pakistan army recently changed its green book to say internal threats are #1 priority. These are contradictory things. This negates his first earlier assertion.
Finally about Hafiz Saeed, there is no evidence (as per my knowledge) that HS was involved directly or indirectly in Mumbai attacks. Because he heads JUD (which is not a militant organization) he cannot be thought of as complacent in the attacks. He is not a proven criminal in the court of law.
All in all, Mush should've been prepared on the issue and would've brought counter points to defend his point of view.
