Muhammad (S.A.W) in the eyes of Non-muslims,Must Watch All
- Thread starter taul
- Start date
C
commander
Guest
Muhammad (S.A.W) in the eyes of Non-muslims,Must Watch for A
Taul bhai please don't write SAW write as S.A.W.
SAW is an English word. and S.A.W is an abbreviation.
Regards
Taul bhai please don't write SAW write as S.A.W.
SAW is an English word. and S.A.W is an abbreviation.
Regards
waseemmanno
Councller (250+ posts)
Thank you very much for sharing such a wonderful post.
God Bless ya!!
God Bless ya!!
contra
Senator (1k+ posts)
1. I don't agree with a single statement that has been made in this video regarding your prophet.
2. It's all false and highly exaggerated, it seems they have written or said this to appeal to a certain group only.
3. The level of violence that we see in the early days of Islam is not seen in any other religion.
2. It's all false and highly exaggerated, it seems they have written or said this to appeal to a certain group only.
3. The level of violence that we see in the early days of Islam is not seen in any other religion.
A
abbasiali
Guest
Dear Contra,contra said:
Your views have its own value, when it starts with you, before I start, may I ask you, have you learnt Quran, offcourse with its meanings, for you this could be only a book, but when you will read it, you will find it more logical, I don't think so that you have ever come across near to it, so I will suggest you not to comment on these kind of posts or thread, If you comments only on the basis of some fictional historical books or movies, then its point less to have any argument with you, so its better to refrain, to get involve on this subject.
contra said:
So many learned men and women from different backgrounds, beliefs, cultures etc are all wrong and stupid :o you had been trying too hard to debunk conspiracies I suggest you read a little about Islam. Why would these people try to appeal to Muslims??? or they were accepting the reality keeping their biases aside.
Level of violence in early days of Islam.....do you mean it got better in later days ?? just wondering.
well violence which in fact was self defense because our Prophet S.A.W had every right to spread the truth but when the unbelievers could not stand his acceptance by common people there was resistance. We all have the right to defend ourselves dont we?? if someone tries to suppress us.
Read about crusades and Gita so that your bias is at least balanced towards other religions as well.
A
abbasiali
Guest
Thanks Contra,contra said:
I highly appreciate your spirit of cooperation and understanding.
CONTRA, leave a side to all others but take the statement of ur Mahatma Gandhi and other Hindu scholars.either they have told lie or u r calling them false.either they were fool or u r a fool.so many great leaders and scholars can't be wrong but a man like u could be an IDIOT of highest order.if we believe on ur statement then i shall say that u r a follower of those leaders to whom u r indirectly calling as cheater or fool or hypocrate . shall i believe that i am right?
contra
Senator (1k+ posts)
rana bhai,
1. I disagree with many of Mahatma Gandhi's views and opinions. He was a human being, he did not claim divinity.
There is no law that states that if i disagree with Mahatma Gandhi or i abuse or criticise him, i should be killed...because he was a peaceful man and he taught peace and non violence...
2. My opinion on Mohammad, your prophet and Islam, your religion, hasn't changed.
1. I disagree with many of Mahatma Gandhi's views and opinions. He was a human being, he did not claim divinity.
There is no law that states that if i disagree with Mahatma Gandhi or i abuse or criticise him, i should be killed...because he was a peaceful man and he taught peace and non violence...
2. My opinion on Mohammad, your prophet and Islam, your religion, hasn't changed.
C
commander
Guest
taul said:
Thanks and Jazak ALLAH
