Launching the Missile That Made History: THE STINGERS

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Launching the Missile That Made History

Three former mujahedeen recall the day when they started to beat the SovietsOCTOBER 1, 2011


By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS

[HI]Outside Jalalabad, Afghanistan, 25 years ago this week, an angry young man named Abdul Wahab Quanat recited his prayers, walked onto a farm field near a Soviet airfield, raised a Stinger missile launcher to his shoulder and shot his way into history.
[/HI]It was the first time since the Soviet invasion seven years earlier that a mujahedeen fighter had destroyed the most feared weapon in the Soviet arsenal, a Hind attack helicopter. The event panicked the Soviet ranks, changed the course of the war and helped to break up the USSR itself.




RV-AE443_STINGE_G_20110930030341.jpg



Getty Images A mujahedeen fighter fighter aims a Stinger missile at a passing airplane in 1988.




Today, Mr. Wahab is general manager of the Afghan central-bank branch near the Khyber Pass, a middle-age man who carries tinted bifocals in his vest pocket and chooses Diet Pepsi over regular. Mr. Wahab and the two other Stinger gunners at the airfield that dayZalmai and Abdul Ghaffarhave now joined the post-jihad establishment. Mr. Zalmai is sub-governor of Shinwar District, and Mr. Ghaffar is a member of parliament.

They nurse a gauzy nostalgia for the joys of being young jihadists. "Those were good, exciting times," Mr. Wahab says. "Now I'm a banker. It's boring."

The Soviet invasion touched off three decades of violent swings in Afghanistan, from socialism to warlordism to Islamic fundamentalism to today's flawed democracy. Amid this tortured history, the U.S. makes occasional appearancesincluding its mid-1980s decision to supply the mujahedeen with Stingersthe consequences of which often weren't apparent until much later.

[HI]At the time, the Soviets and their Afghan allies were on the offensive, thanks to the Hinds. Heavily armored, the helicopters were indifferent to ground fire as they strafed and rocketed mujahedeen and civilians alike. In 1986, the Reagan administration and its congressional allies put aside qualms about dispatching missile launchers. The move likely contributed to the Soviet withdrawal.[/HI] Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, faced with an imploding domestic economy, was already seeking an exit from a costly war.

There's no straight line from the U.S. move to arm the mujahedeen to 9/11 and the 2001 American invasion, but the decision has echoed through the subsequent decades of turmoil. After Kabul's fall, and with American attention elsewhere, the mujahedeen fell on each other. Messrs. Ghaffar and Zalmai squabbled over money and weapons.




OB-PX732_stinge_G_20110930175403.jpg



Michael M. Phillips for The Wall Street Journal AAbdul Wahab Quanat shows how he fired the first Stinger missile at a Soviet Hind helicopter 25 years ago.




"I disarmed his men, and he disarmed my men," says Mr. Zalmai. (They have since reconciled, and Mr. Ghaffar's daughter married Mr. Zalmai's nephew.)

[HI]The Taliban emerged on top, and the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency spent years trying to recover 600 unused Stingers, including 53 that found their way to Mullah Omar, the Taliban leader who hosted Osama bin Laden during the 9/11 attacks, according to the book "Ghost Wars" by Steve Coll.
[/HI]
[HI]Key figures from that era, including those who received U.S. support, have ended up on the other side. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the ruthless head of the fundamentalist Hezb-e-Islami mujahedeen, provided the Stinger gunmen.[/HI] Among Mr. Hekmatyar's other backers was bin Laden, who paid Arab militants to fight in the Afghan jihad and in doing so earned the trust of the Taliban.

[HI]As Mr. Wahab remembers, the Pakistani officials who were acting as a conduit between the U.S. and the Afghan fighters packed him and nine other Hekmatyar fighters into the back of a truck, covered it in a tarp so they wouldn't see where they were going, and took them to a training camp in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
[/HI]
[HI]For a month, they practiced with dummy Stingers aimed at a hanging light. Pakistani officers then handed over real missiles to the eight successful graduates. [/HI]One team headed to Kabul to shoot down troop-transport planes. The other, headed by Mr. Ghaffar, an engineer by training, was dispatched to go after the Hind helicopters.

As they parted, one Pakistani instructor tearfully called Mr. Wahab a "holy warrior" and reminded him to hit the switch that arms the missile's heat-seeking device. After a two-day walk, the fighters spent the night of Sept. 25 in an abandoned village on the outskirts of Jalalabad. [HI]The next afternoon, Mr. Ghaffar and his men knelt down for prayers and then made their way into a farm field, where they spotted about 10 helicopters returning to the airfield.[/HI][HI]
The best student at Stinger camp, Mr. Wahab took the first shot. The missile made a whirring noise that changed tone as it locked onto a Hind. Mr. Wahab recited a prayer. "In the name of Allah, the supreme and almighty, God is great." He recalls the Hind's tail rotor breaking off, while the front section burst into flames and plummeted to earth, cockpit first.
[/HI][HI]
"I'll never forget that moment," he says now. "Those helicopters had killed so many people, left so many orphans."
[/HI]Messrs. Ghaffar and Zalmai fired next. Mr. Wahab says neither missile hit a Hind; Mr. Ghaffar's, he says, hit the ground, while Mr. Zalmai forgot the heat-seeker-arming switch.

Mr. Ghaffar remembers one missile hitting a helicopter, but says it could have been either one. Mr. Zalmai says he can't recall for certain but admits he's not a great marksman. (The CIA reported that three helicopters had gone down.)
What is certain is that Mr. Ghaffar then shouldered a spare Stinger and this time sent a Hind crashing to earth. Mr. Wahab recalls mujahedeen cheering when the helicopters went down. Terrified that the Soviets would send tanks after them, the three scampered back to Pakistan.

[HI]Mr. Ghaffar dined out on his success for months, meeting with the CIA and having tea in Peshawar with Rep. Charlie Wilson, the late Texas Democrat and relentless champion of the mujahedeen.
[/HI]
[HI]The Ghaffar team had proved the Stingers so effective that the CIA sent some 2,300 more. Soon the mujahedeen were shooting down helicopters, transport planes and jets in large numbers. "If we hadn't used them correctly, they probably wouldn't have provided any more Stingers for the Afghan jihad," says Mr. Ghaffar. One Soviet squadron lost 13 of 40 planes in the year that followed, 10 to Stingers. The final Soviet troops retreated from Afghanistan in 1989, and the mujahedeen took Kabul in 1992.
[/HI]
"We wrote historyI miss those days," says Mr. Ghaffar, now 54. A member of parliament, he denies accusations by some locals that he has become a land-grabbing power broker.
Mr. Zalmai, who estimates his age at 50, barely had a beard when he took to the mountains in 1980. He smiles when he remembers blowing the tracks off of Soviet tanks. "I was good at it," he says. He admits that his memories are filtered through the haze of age and two brain-jarring attempts on his life during the current insurgency.
As a local administrator, Mr. Zalmai spends a good deal of time these days complaining that the Americans failed to consult him about plans to raze one government office to build another.
"When you're young, you're emotional about everything," Mr. Zalmai says of his days as a jihadist. "When you're old, everything can be solved by talking."
After the Taliban takeover, Mr. Wahab fled to Pakistan, where he ran a fabric shop. After the Taliban fell, he returned to Afghanistan and landed the central-bank job. Now 49, he supervises commercial banks adjacent to the Khyber Pass, through which mujahedeen weapons and fighters once flowed.

[HI]"When I was a mujahedeen on a mountaintop, I'd see the lights of Jalalabad and wish I were there," Mr. Wahab says. "Now when I'm in Jalalabad, I miss being in a stone hideout in the mountains with the mujahedeen."
Mr. Wahab has little patience for today's insurgents. "We had an enemythe Russians," he says. "These suicide bombers today attack Americans and Muslims. What's the point?"
[/HI]Write to Michael M. Phillips at [email protected]




 

WatanDost

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
NOW POOR AMERICA ON COURSE





2.gif





1111.gif











[SIZE=+1]FALLOUT FROM THE COLD WAR IN AFGHANISTAN


By Uli Schmetzer

The saying what you sow you harvest applies also to war as the U.S. public discovered this month when leaked classified documents revealed the C.I.A. in the 1980s probably supplied the heat-seeking Stinger missiles to Afghanistan that are today knocking down American warplanes and helicopters and killing their crews.

[HI]The Wikileaks documents published this week proved US helicopters, drones and warplanes had been shot down by surface-to-air heat-seeking missiles and not, as military spokesmen kept claiming, by artillery and ground fire. [/HI]

Obviously no one in the Pentagon was eager to recall the Cold War against the Soviets when the Americans shipped hundreds of the shoulder-held Stingers to the Afghan Mujahideen fighting the Russians. The American missiles, easily transported and easily handled, helped turn the tide of the war. They neutralized Soviet air superiority, especially attack helicopters. The loss of air power played a major role in the ignominious defeat of the Soviet army in Afghanistan, a precursor to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

[HI]Now the same fire power has been turned against its American suppliers.
[/HI]
During the Soviet-Afghan war the Afghan warlords used the coveted Stingers sparingly, hoarding as many as they could, both as status symbols and as deterrents. [HI]Though some military apologists claim the Stingers have become non-operational with age others feel with proper care and technology they can either be reactivated or copied by artisans in a nation that for generations managed to copy anything from one-shot fountain pens to sophisticated artillery pieces.
[/HI]

In the late 1990s I reported for the first time from Afghanistan the frantic though largely futile search of the C.I.A. to repurchase the Stingers from the Afghan warlords, years after the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. Obviously the C.I.A. realized the potential danger of such weapons in the hands of tribal warlords fighting on one side one day and the other side the next. Then there was the peril of such weapons falling into the hands of terrorists.


Anxious to locate and recollect what they had so generously provided to the Mujahideen, [HI]the Americans [/HI]not only asked the entire western diplomatic corps in the region to help find the missiles but [HI]offered to buy them back at twice and then three times the price the missiles had originally cost the American taxpayer.
[/HI]
Even then the harvest was sparse. The warlords coveted their beloved military toys. In the end the [HI]Pentagon used the flimsy excuse that the hunt for the missiles was no longer necessary because the weapons had become useless after a certain time because their batteries and systems had run down. That claim has always been disputed. In view of the published documents it appears now another tailor-made lie by spin-doctors, one of those convenience lies that camouflage military and secret service debacles.
[/HI]

The story of the heat-seeking missiles downing U.S. and allied planes once again illustrates how easily the official proliferation of lethal arms can backfire. How many rebel armies or so-called freedom fighters have been armed by western weaponry? How many of these donated weapons were eventually turned against civilians and often against citizen of the producers and suppliers?

Among the 91,000 classified documents the internet research site [HI]Wikileak.org offered to media outlets[/HI] thanks apparently to reports supplied from deep throats in the army and possibly the Pentagon - [HI]one of the most significant is the admission on paper that heat-seeking missiles, probably Stingers or cloned Stingers, are killing U.S. and allied airmen.
[/HI]

For opponents and critics of the war in Afghanistan the Wikileak documents may prove to be as embarrassing as were the Pentagon Papers - the secret think tank documents assessing the Vietnam War - documents Pentagon insider Daniel Ellsberg smuggled out to the media.

[HI]The Pentagon Papers, showing the war was a mess and not winnable, changed public opinion and played a key role in U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam. Judging by the contents of the Wikileak papers the Afghan war, just as the Vietnam war, has been a disaster and is virtually impossible to win. Over the six years of the war the Afghan public has become disillusioned and alienated from its liberators and now sympathizes again with the Taliban.
[/HI]
[HI]The classified reports from Afghanistan detail police brutality, extortion, kidnapping and murder by recruited Afghan police and military (just as in South Vietnam). Corruption is rampant. Police and army officials set up checkpoints extorting payment from motorists; regional army chiefs claim firefights which did not occur to receive ammunitions and weapons from the U.S. which they then sell in the bazaar; warlords operate above the law; Pakistans military secret service works hand in hand with the Taliban; mistaken air raids on supposed Taliban fighters kill hundreds of civilians and have left the NATO forces highly unpopular in a country that has always successfully fought off invaders, among them the British and the Soviets.
[/HI]
[HI]Sixty-thousand dollar missiles have been fired on silly targets, among them two workers hoeing in a field; a Reaper drone had to be shot down by scrambled fighter jets when it ran amok; those caught extorting or robbing are often released for lack of evidence or because witnesses vanish; vital supplies for troops are delayed or disappear, just as they did in Vietnam; army vehicles and army uniforms find their way to the re-emerging Taliban forces which are becoming stronger and more daring by the month.
[/HI]
Judging by these official documents the war in Afghanistan is already classified as a disaster just like the war in Vietnam was.
The question now is will President Obama and Congress call it quits are will the economically strapped U.S. pour more money into a country that has already gobbled up billions of dollars in U.S. aid and bribes in the battle against an enemy who seems to become stronger rather then weaker and apparently also benefits from U.S. largesse.

Uli Schmetzer was a foreign correspondent for 37 years for Reuters and the Chicago Tribune. He is the author of Times of Terror and Gaza (available on Amazon.com) He won an Alternate Pulitzer for his report on the CIAs efforts to buy back the U.S.-made surface-to-air Stinger missiles donated to the Mujahideen for their war against the Soviets.





[/SIZE]

 
Last edited:

Back
Top