KP's Conflict of Interest Act : My Foot!!!

ThirdUmpireFinger

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Question mark over KP govts multi-billion rupee ad contract - PTI awarding contract to themselves.

Question mark over KP govts multi-billion rupee ad contract

PESHAWAR: The award of a multi-billion rupee contract for a print and electronic media campaign to showcase the PTI-led Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments performance to a company along with two others with known ties to a key PTI leader has raised questions about conflict of interest and transparency, documents available with Dawn reveal.
Documents show that in an official letter issued on Oct 20, the information secretary of the government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa informed the three advertising agencies that in the light of the presentation to the steering committee, they were authorised to run the publicity campaign of the special initiatives undertaken by the KP government.
The decision to grant the contract to advertising agencies had come against the backdrop of a meeting chaired by KP Chief Minister Pervez Khan Khattak on Dec 28, 2015, formulating a policy to regularise the publicity campaign of the government initiatives through print, electronic and other media platforms.

Subsequently, the informa*tion department invited adver*tising agencies to submit their profiles by April 18, 2016. A total of 10 advertising agencies presented their proposals at a meeting chaired by Adviser to the CM on Information Mushtaq Ghani.
Out of the 10, the performance of four advertising agencies registered with the information department was deemed appropriate and up to the mark.

The agencies shortlisted at the time on April 18, 2016,did not include the advertising agency Javed Faisal Khan, PTIs additional secretary infor*mation and head of its Social Media & Marketing at the Chairman Secretariat, once served.
According to minutes of the meeting, after obtaining the expert opinion of Mr Iftikhar Durrani and Faisal Javed, it was decided that the top four agencies though declared appropriate, do not have the capacity to run an effective publicity campaign.

Mr Durrani is the head of the central media department at the PTI secretariat in Islamabad. The partys chief spokesman, Naeemul Haq, said that Mr Durrani was not a party office-bearer but a paid employee at the central secretariat.
Mr Durrani was not a member of the original steering committee which had held its first meeting in March 2015, and was notified later in 2016.

The April 18 meeting further decided to re-advertise the campaign, inviting even the unregistered agencies but to do so, the documents said, the companies would have to register themselves with the information department and for this purpose, the rules of registration will be relaxed with the approval of the competent authority.
The doors thus reopened for companies which had missed the initial bidding process to register themselves enabling the particular advertising agency to get itself registered and participate in the competition.
How did the PTI as a party end up associating with a process that was entirely in the official domain and allowed one of its key leaders, who at the time was the resident director of the advertising agency, to help frame a policy that would at a later stage be seen as a conflict of interest is not known. How did Mr Faisal become a member of the steering committee, knowing that he could have a direct conflict of interest? Mr Ghani, the information adviser, was asked. He was equivocal in his reply: I cant really tell. He had to become a member and he did become one.

Faisal Javed attended the steering committees maiden meeting on March 11, 2015, at Banigala, Islamabad, that developed a consensus that the pitch document along with technical add-ons on the mechanism for the selection of advertising agencies will also be shared with the Information Department by the PTI Marketing Team.

Mr Javed has been head of the PTIs Social Media & Marketing Department in the Chairmans Secretariat but at the time of the steering committees first meeting in March 2015, he was also the head of operations of the advertising agency.
By his own accounts, he quit the agency in March 2016. Photographs posted on his Instagram and Twitter accounts show him shooting an advertisement for a national cellular phone company in Bangkok in March 2016.

He shared his photos of the shoot along with Pakistani actor Shaan Shahid and child star from the famous Indian movie Bajrangi Bhaijaan Harshaali Malhotra and Indian film director and producer Anurag Kashyap.

That was my last project before I quit the company on March 31, 2016, Mr Javed responded when approached for comments.
The commercial was completed in April and released somewhere in May 2016, according to available online data.
I left the job after nine years of working there, he continued. And I resigned because of the conflict of interest issue involving my work with the work I was doing for the party, he maintained.
During the period between March 2015, when the steering committee first held its meeting, and the last meeting, he said the government did not release a single advertisement. I was at the peak of my career and I sacrificed it for the sake of my party, he said.

Dawn, it may be mentioned, filed two requests with the department of information, government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, under the Right to Information Act, 2013, in November and December 2016 to seek certain documents related with the process.

It was followed with a complaint to the Chief Commissioner, Right to Information Commission, earlier this month.
In a meeting chaired by Chief Minister Khattak on Aug 15, 2016, Secretary Information Mohammad Tahir Hassan, while giving a detailed presentation on the proposed campaign, sought Rs3 billion to run an aggressive campaign on print and electronic media.

Mr Javed and Mr Durrani were present during the meeting, according to minutes of the meeting, at Chief Minister House in Peshawar.

The proposal was approved with Mr Khattak directing the secretary information to move a summary for the release of the amount as soon as possible.

The CM adviser, however, told Dawn that the government had released Rs1 billion to the depart*ment so far. He acknowledged that the PTI leadership and the CM were taking steps to address concerns. Mr Naeeemul Haq said the matter had been brought to the notice of the party chairman.
Published in Dawn, December 20th, 2016

http://www.dawn.com/news/1303401/question-mark-over-kp-govts-multi-billion-rupee-ad-contract
 

barkat99

MPA (400+ posts)
He was resident director of the company. A Partner.
Where is it written that he was partner. Various companies give titles of director to their employees. The article u published shows him as head of operations (employee). Can you provide evidence he was a partner?
 

دوسرا_سوال

Minister (2k+ posts)
Aaaaj se 5 years pehley tak kisi ko peta nahin hota tha ke conflict of interest kia hotaaaa haaaaiiiiii....

Imran khan ke betaney ke baaaad tum log KPK mein conflict of interest ki stories dhoooond rehey hooo... Jab ke punjab mein aaaaesey tumhein dozens of stories nazar aaaaein gi with corruption.

Lekin wehan tum logon ki bolti bund ho jaaaaati haaaaaaaiiiii...


Teen chaar saal pehlay, all humanity didn't know what a wheel was. Thanks to Imran he invested the wheel, now the humanity is indebted to him.
 

دوسرا_سوال

Minister (2k+ posts)
Halal meeting for you: What Maryam is doing here??

C0GGS-mXEAA9nRZ.jpg:large




In the above pic, Bubble Butt is doing exactly what the Ivanka Butt is doing in the pic below:




ivanka-trump-japan.jpg
 

30-Maar Khan

Senator (1k+ posts)

eye-eye-PTI

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Agar dil pr pathar rakh kr iss ko chabal maan hi lia hy tu iss pr b ek thread bna dety

Bhai Patwariyon se aisay mutalbaat naa kia karain jinn main munafiqat naa chhalak rahee ho


Jahan Munafiqat ho wahan patwari aisay nazar aain ge jesay gan'dgi per makheeyaan jatee hain
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
According to the article Faisal Javed left his JOB after working there for 9 years in early 2016, keyword being JOB i.e he was an employee. Also the funds were not released till August 2016, well after Faisal had left the company. It makes sense to put a person in charge or be part of a group of something he has relevant experience in, Faisal Javed was already PTIs Head of Social Media & Marketing plus his adv credentials, so he is a good choice to be part of that committee, also he did not own the adv agency which was not selected because it was not registered in the first round. He quit his job in March 2016 citing conflict of interest and in April 2016 regulations were relaxed which then made his ex adv agency eligible. Still no guarantee at that time that his ex company would get the job. So he probably hand fore knowledge since he was part of the steering commitee that the new relaxed rules would make his employers agency eligible, hence he quit his JOB citing conflict of interest, which up until that time there was none. A decision that needs to applauded rather than vilified.

If it can be proved Faisal Javed made financial gains or got some other benefits from his ex employer due to this, then there is a case to be made here, until that time I don't see any issues

And plus this of course from the other thread

A malicious campaign, it was a technical committee comprises of 8 members out of which 2 were ministers and 4 secretaries and we two were the techinqual experts, the committee has reviewed the techinqual aspect of the propsals with no financial power/ approvals .our opinion wasn't a binding on the provincial government. There were total of 16 companies out of which 12 were short listed. The company reffered is a blue chip company with having an expertise in brand building. There is no specific award of contract .the companies are short listed for assignment on need basis.


Iftikhar Durrani Response
 
Last edited:

araein

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Teen chaar saal pehlay, all humanity didn't know what a wheel was. Thanks to Imran he invested the wheel, now the humanity is indebted to him.

Why poootwaaaris never raised questions on conflict of interest in punjab... U can find dozens of conflict of interests issues in Punjab.....
 

mhafeez

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Where is it written that he was partner. Various companies give titles of director to their employees. The article u published shows him as head of operations (employee). Can you provide evidence he was a partner?

As per IRO Act. 2012

2. (ix) “employer” in relation to an establishment, means any person or body of persons, whether incorporated or not, who or which employs workmen in the establishment under a contract of employment and includes,---

(a) an heir, successor or assign, as the case may be, of such person or body as aforesaid;

(b) any person responsible for the management and control of the establishment;

(c) in relation to an establishment run by or under the authority of any department of the Federal Government, the authority appointed in this behalf or, where no authority is so appointed, the Head of the department;

(d) in relation to an establishment run by or on behalf of a local authority, the officer appointed in this behalf, or where no officer is so appointed, the chief executive officer of that authority;

Explanation.—For the purpose of distinction from the category of “workers” or “workmen”, officers and employees of a department of the Federal Government who belong to the superior, managerial, secretarial, directorial, supervisory or agency staff and who have been notified for this purpose in the official Gazette shall be deemed to fall within the category of “employers”; and

(e) in relation to any other establishment, the proprietor of such establishment and every director, manager, secretary, agent or officer or person concerned with the management of the affairs thereof;

As Adcom is not a listed company so we don't have the share register of this company or can't find the partner but as per above definition he was surely an employer.
 

mhafeez

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
According to the article Faisal Javed left his JOB after working there for 9 years in early 2016, keyword being JOB i.e he was an employee. Also the funds were not released till August 2016, well after Faisal had left the company. It makes sense to put a person in charge or be part of a group of something he has relevant experience in, Faisal Javed was already PTIs Head of Social Media & Marketing plus his adv credentials, so he is a good choice to be part of that committee, also he did not own the adv agency which was not selected because it was not registered in the first round. He quit his job in March 2016 citing conflict of interest and in April 2016 regulations were relaxed which then made his ex adv agency eligible. Still no guarantee at that time that his ex company would get the job. So he probably hand fore knowledge since he was part of the steering commitee that the new relaxed rules would make his employers agency eligible, hence he quit his JOB citing conflict of interest, which up until that time there was none. A decision that needs to applauded rather than vilified.

If it can be proved Faisal Javed made financial gains or got some other benefits from his ex employer due to this, then there is a case to be made here, until that time I don't see any issues

And plus this of course from the other thread


Bhai Jan, the first meeting was held in March,2015. His company or the company he associated with (Adcom) was a bidder for the project, despite that he joined the team to finalize the tender. A valid question raised that Adcom has not Pre-qualification Registration with KP Government. So the first tender cancelled a fresh tender called to admit the bid of Adcom.

You don't see anything fishy, God bless you.
 

barkat99

MPA (400+ posts)
As per IRO Act. 2012

2. (ix) “employer” in relation to an establishment, means any person or body of persons, whether incorporated or not, who or which employs workmen in the establishment under a contract of employment and includes,---

(a) an heir, successor or assign, as the case may be, of such person or body as aforesaid;

(b) any person responsible for the management and control of the establishment;

(c) in relation to an establishment run by or under the authority of any department of the Federal Government, the authority appointed in this behalf or, where no authority is so appointed, the Head of the department;

(d) in relation to an establishment run by or on behalf of a local authority, the officer appointed in this behalf, or where no officer is so appointed, the chief executive officer of that authority;

Explanation.—For the purpose of distinction from the category of “workers” or “workmen”, officers and employees of a department of the Federal Government who belong to the superior, managerial, secretarial, directorial, supervisory or agency staff and who have been notified for this purpose in the official Gazette shall be deemed to fall within the category of “employers”; and

(e) in relation to any other establishment, the proprietor of such establishment and every director, manager, secretary, agent or officer or person concerned with the management of the affairs thereof;

As Adcom is not a listed company so we don't have the share register of this company or can't find the partner but as per above definition he was surely an employer.
Now you changed from partner to employer?? Haha. What is IRO you copy pasted above?
 

Iconoclast

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
I think tmhari ghar be maa bhen ha? and u call your sister product? shame on your thinking.
My sisters don't go around looting the country like shameless kunts. Go make her your mum for all i care. Personally I don't give a rat's *** about her. You must really have a low opinion of your sisters and mothers since you compared them to this bitsch.
 

mhafeez

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Now you changed from partner to employer?? Haha. What is IRO you copy pasted above?

No, I didn't change the stance. I was just responding to your assumption of "Employee". He was a resident director when he left the company on papers only.

IRO Act 2012 (INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2012) is an act of parliament which dealt with relations between Employees and their employers.

www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1335934287_218.pdf
 
Last edited:

barkat99

MPA (400+ posts)
No, I didn't change the stance. I was just responding to your assumption of "Employee". He was a resident director when he left the company on papers only.

IRO Act 2012 (INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2012) is an act of parliament which dealt with relations between Employees and their employers.

www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1335934287_218.pdf

How does an act of parliament prove anyone is an employer in a particular company? This is an amazing logic.
 

Back
Top