"Islamic terrorists slaughtering Christians as part of global Jihad" Donald Trump reacts to Berlin a

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)


Reacting to Berlin attack,here is the president-elect Donald Trump's statement:


President-elect Donald Trump condemned the attack in Berlin, after a driver ploughed a lorry through a crowded Christmas market in the centre of Berlin.


At least 12 people died in the alleged attack, while almost 50 others sustained injuries. The driver fled the scene, but police say they have arrested a suspect they believe was at the wheel. The passenger in the vehicle died at the scene.


The incident was reminiscent of an attack in Nice, France, when a lorry driver drove through a crowded outdoor celebration for Bastille Day on 14 July. Isis later claimed responsibility for the attack, calling the truck driver a soldier.



But the motivation behind Mondays deadly episode remains unclear. Still, the President-elect was quick to blame Isis and radical Islamist groups before investigators could issue any confirmation.


Our hearts and prayers are with the loved ones of the victims of today's horrifying terror attack in Berlin, Mr Trump said. Innocent civilians were murdered in the streets as they prepared to celebrate the Christmas holiday.


He added: Isis and other Islamist terrorists continually slaughter Christians in their communities and places of worship as part of their global jihad.


These terrorists and their regional and worldwide networks must be eradicated from the face of the earth, a mission we will carry out with all freedom-loving partners.


On Twitter, he elaborated on his warning.


Today there were terror attacks in Turkey, Switzerland, and Germany and it is only getting worse, he wrote. The civilised world must change thinking!"


But German officials have warned against using such extreme language before police could confirm the reason behind the incident.


"I don't want to use the word 'attack' yet at the moment, although a lot speaks for it," said Germany's interior minister Thomas de Maizire.


"There is a psychological effect in the whole country of the choice of words here, and we want to be very, very cautious and operate close to the actual investigation results, not with speculation."



Source

 
Last edited by a moderator:

atensari

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
What came first Jihad or Crusade?

As for as the history is the guide, Crusades were a Christian reaction against Jihad.
آپ اپنی طرف کی سٹوری سنائیں میں اپنی سٹوری سناؤں گا. اس دفعہ صلیبی جنگ کے جواب میں جہاد ہو گا
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
آپ اپنی طرف کی سٹوری سنائیں میں اپنی سٹوری سناؤں گا. اس دفعہ صلیبی جنگ کے جواب میں جہاد ہو گا

But Jihadis have already launched Holy war against West

while Trump is just Planning it

Mr. Atensari , about 150 years ago Western powers launched a war against Muslim world, defeated it completely, enslaved it entirely but you were sleeping with your Holy war.

Later the Western powers got pity on you and gave you freedom, but Holy Shittt you cannot digest freedom
 

atensari

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
But Jihadis have already launched Holy war against West

while Trump is just Planning it

Mr. Atensari , about 150 years ago Western powers launched a war against Muslim world, defeated it completely, enslaved it entirely but you were sleeping with your Holy war.

Later the Western powers got pity on you and gave you freedom, but Holy Shittt you cannot digest freedom

From the August 2001 Trumpet Print Edition
آخری صلیبی جنگ کی تیاریاں نو دو گیارہ سے پہلے سے جاری تھیں

انگریز چلے گئے، انھے مسٹر براونز پر ذرا ترس نہیں آیا ساتھ لیجانے کی بجائے پیچھے چھوڑ گئے براؤن جو مرضی کر لے براؤن ہی رہتا ہے. براونز کو وہ سہانے دن بہت یاد اتے ہیں
 
Last edited:

rising_pakistan

Minister (2k+ posts)
The thing westerners don't realize that

in Arab wars scores of people are getting killed

alone in Iraq 1 million died

When one person dies here in west, we all get angry and rightly so

Do you expect the others to stay quite

They need to look into root cause of terrorism otherwise It'll keep happening
 

ramlal

Banned
But Jihadis have already launched Holy war against West

while Trump is just Planning it

Mr. Atensari , about 150 years ago Western powers launched a war against Muslim world, defeated it completely, enslaved it entirely but you were sleeping with your Holy war.

Later the Western powers got pity on you and gave you freedom, but Holy Shittt you cannot digest freedom


english empire ki colonial army me baloch ,pathan, aur punjab regiment me pakistan ke bahadur musalman fauzio ne middle east ki war me bhi turki khilafat ke
against part lia tha .
 

atensari

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
english empire ki colonial army me baloch ,pathan, aur punjab regiment me pakistan ke bahadur musalman fauzio ne middle east ki war me bhi turki khilafat ke
against part lia tha .
تحریک خلافت شروع کرنے والے بھی مسلمان تھے جس میں گاندھی سمیت بہت سے ہندؤں نے حصہ لیا تھا
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
english empire ki colonial army me baloch ,pathan, aur punjab regiment me pakistan ke bahadur musalman fauzio ne middle east ki war me bhi turki khilafat ke
against part lia tha .

That's what I am trying to say Western powers successfully invaded and enslaved entire Muslim world from Morocco to Indonesia and later they freed their slaves in a goodwill gesture due to the rise of liberalism in the west

Our Mullahs often propagate that West wants to eliminate Muslims from the face of Earth

The question arises

Why they did not eliminated Muslims when they had all the power in the world and entire Muslim world was their slave?
 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Your understanding of history and deliberate concocting of history is laughable at best.

The Muslim world was never enslaved holistically as it was not possible for the west to do that due to massive populations of the muslim world and huge armies of the past empire.

What they did was CONTROL the continent, money supply and politics though PAID goons and spreading disinformation using 1diots like you :lol: ..

In Europe, turkey was offered to use its army after a freemason ataturk was selected to run those countries affairs.

Plus the west never really HELD on to any territory. Neither in Hindustan nor else where because they knew, they never had the manpower to do that.

What they did is incisions and installed their dictators or consipracies like "Lawrence of Arabia" at times when the general rule and economic situation of those rulers were weak in general. Decline is a fact for every empire.

West never elimnated ?? Then what were the 2 world wars ? - combined 80 million people that perished in them ?...they mean nothing to you ?

Millions of unaccounted deaths during the british occupation of Hindustan have simply not been documented because tyrants dont write their own history and neither do the victims do
:biggthumpup:

What was the holocaust ?

What was nagasaki and hiroshima ?

What was oil price collapse of 1930's ???

You need a good history class which you were thrown out of for your low IQ level :lol: ...Go play 1diot somewhere else !

That's what I am trying to say Western powers successfully invaded and enslaved entire Muslim world from Morocco to Indonesia and later they freed their slaves in a goodwill gesture due to the rise of liberalism in the west

Our Mullahs often propagate that West wants to eliminate Muslims from the face of Earth

The question arises

Why they did not eliminated Muslims when they had all the power in the world and entire Muslim world was their slave?
 
Last edited:

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Your understanding of history and deliberate concocting of history is laughable at best.

The Muslim world was never enslaved holistically as it was not possible for the west to do that due to massive populations of the muslim world and huge armies of the past empire.

What they did was CONTROL the continent, money supply and politics though PAID goons and spreading disinformation using 1diots like you :lol: ..

In Europe, turkey was offered to use its army after a freemason ataturk was selected to run those countries affairs.

Plus the west never really HELD on to any territory. Neither in Hindustan nor else where because they knew, they never had the manpower to do that.

What they did is incisions and installed their dictators or consipracies like "Lawrence of Arabia" at times when the general rule and economic situation of those rulers were weak in general. Decline is a fact for every empire.

West never elimnated ?? Then what were the 2 world wars ? - combined 80 million people that perished in them ?...they mean nothing to you ?

Millions of unaccounted deaths during the british occupation of Hindustan have simply not been documented because tyrants dont write their own history and neither do the victims do
:biggthumpup:

What was the holocaust ?

What was nagasaki and hiroshima ?

What was oil price collapse of 1930's ???

You need a good history class which you were thrown out of for your low IQ level :lol: ...Go play 1diot somewhere else !

O budhoo ancient Faqeer aka charlatan

You speak of manpower?..... They could easily have that from Hindus and Africans

Bhudhoo my argument was against Mullah's propaganda that West wants to eliminate Muslims from the face of Earth

If they used Nuclear bomb to destroy Heroshima Nagasaki for fun then what stopped them to use it against Muslims after all elimination of Muslims is their favorite sport?
 
Last edited:

Pukaar

Senator (1k+ posts)
O budhoo ancient Faqeer aka charlatan

You speak of manpower?..... They could easily have that from Hindus and Africans

Bhudhoo my argument was against Mullah's propaganda that West wants to eliminate Muslims from the face of Earth

If they used Nuclear bomb to destroy Heroshima Nagasaki for fun then what stopped them to use it against Muslims after all elimination of Muslims is their favorite sport?


The
basic survival of Christianity demands that Islam must be subdued because they know that everytime a new Prophet rises, the older civilization has to surrender
 

Pukaar

Senator (1k+ posts)
What came first Jihad or Crusade?

As for as the history is the guide, Crusades were a Christian reaction against Jihad.

White
Christians fought 1000 years to capture Jerusalem and Bethlehem but God forbid if they accept that Jesus was actually a brown man
 

Liberal 000

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

The
basic survival of Christianity demands that Islam must be subdued because they know that everytime a new Prophet rises, the older civilization has to surrender

Not true

Judaism is still here and still occupying the place as it was 2000 years ago

Christianity got boost during colonial era and made its way to Americas, Australia, Africa and Asia and all this happened in last few hundred years

What about Mormons and their Prophet Josph Smith , nowadays Mormons make up the majority population in Utha state a big state by landmass

Will older civilizations like Islam and Christianity surrender to Prophet Joseph Smith and his religion Mormonism?
 

nepali.nationalist

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
As usual ...when you cant come back with a LOGICAL argument you reduce yourself to personal attacks !

But i will take answer your delusions back logically . Which africans would have sided with them ? ...The ones that were fighting their rule in north africa or the ones who were of no interest to them ?

We all know how white/african relationships go right ? ...what does history tell us ?
:biggthumpup: - There is a TRUST deficit !..Which is why, that relationship has never worked and probably never will.

You still see race riots in the US !

What a DUMB proposition !
:lol: ..If your going to INVENT history please do so logically !

Plus all the wealth from Hindustan, middle east and North africa and that also from mostlyy MUSLIM states of Empires was used to fund the economies of the UK, France and Europe which led to the Industrial revolution, not to mention the kohinoor with the Queen of England !

So they could have either funded their pockets or the pockets of africans which anyways wasnt feasible at that time. Like i said, if they had the choice they would have done and all that and alot has been done and "COVERED UP" :biggthumpup:

Plus, politically they made it look like a "secular" affair because just as it holds true today, had they made it look like a "religious war" they would have had to face the wrath of a more than a billion people . That theory still holds up to it today because most of the west has DEEP interest in the Muslim world.

Muslim countries have the largest armies, so they buy a lot of weapons, they have oil, which the west needs, and we have a market for everything that the west has to sell. (bigsmile)

Right now we also have people to give to revive aging and decadent societies who cannot propogate enough to even continue their way of life. Thats why you see governments rushing to bring in syrian refugees despite all the framed attacks being blamed on muslims wrongfully.

Hiroshima and nagasaki were NOT muslims, the people their dont have an IDEOLOGY followed by almost 2 billion people in the world. Spread in every corner of the Globe, with every resource and Nato ally at their Disposal. THIS IS WHY they cannot treat the Muslim world like Nagasaki - Comprendo ?? :lol:

Dumb idiots can Day dream and fool themselves - But the reality is largely very different !


O budhoo ancient Faqeer aka charlatan

You speak of manpower?..... They could easily have that from Hindus and Africans

Bhudhoo my argument was against Mullah's propaganda that West wants to eliminate Muslims from the face of Earth

If they used Nuclear bomb to destroy Heroshima Nagasaki for fun then what stopped them to use it against Muslims after all elimination of Muslims is their favorite sport?
 
Last edited: