India Will Nuke Pakistan - The Simpsons Predicts

Wake Up Pakistan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dude its nuke not normal weapons, any nuke attack on area west of nagpur in India will not just have direct impact on Indian population but also on Pakistani population (that area contains Dehli, Gujrat, Indian Punjab, Mumbai , Pune and others). The indirect impact of a nuclear attack will not only have impact on the region but the whole world !!

Secondly, Pakistani military doctrine isnt No first Use, and it makes sense, keeping into account the size of India and size of its army, nuclear arms are the fall back plan, that is it will be used and it will mean the wide scale destruction of both the country and environmental doom for the earth, this keeps Pakistan safe from Indian attack, because even though we have quality in our military, India has quantity which greatly outnumbers our army, in case of war, we can maybe manage to down 3 times our size, that would mean loss of our complete army, but on indian side just around half of it.

U HAVE NO INFORMATION HOW NUKES WORKS.

WE HAVE A SMALL TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON FOR DESTRUCTION OF LIMITED AREA AND REGION.

AND KEEP DREAMING OUR WHOLE ARMY FINISHED

WAR NOT ALWAYS WIN BY ARMY BUT PEOPLE

EVEN IF WHOLE PAK ARMY DIED THERE WILL BE GORILLA WAR AGANST INDIA AND CIVIL WAR WITHIN INDIA AS WELL
 

khipk

Senator (1k+ posts)
U HAVE NO INFORMATION HOW NUKES WORKS.

WE HAVE A SMALL TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON FOR DESTRUCTION OF LIMITED AREA AND REGION.

AND KEEP DREAMING OUR WHOLE ARMY FINISHED

WAR NOT ALWAYS WIN BY ARMY BUT PEOPLE

EVEN IF WHOLE PAK ARMY DIED THERE WILL BE GORILLA WAR AGANST INDIA AND CIVIL WAR WITHIN INDIA AS WELL

dude relax no need to shout..
1. Pakistan developed/tested the NASR missile (the tactical missile) only recently in 2011. The doctrine is older than that.

2. Thats exactly the reason why we got into the nuclear program to compensate for the non parity in conventional arms and the size of Army. At max our 1 soldier can take out 3 of theirs, our more advance airforce will for sure have starting edge, but the size of our economy, army strength and the fact unlike India, Pakistani land mass is narrow and concentrated along the indian border and hence exposed to the attack (not to mention around 70% of our population are near the indian border) , will result in bleeding out the resources, as it happened in 1965. We could not sustain the war as long as India could, even though we had captured more land early on.

The second strike nuclear submarine is also part of that doctrine. They are equiped with long range strategic nuclear arms rather than the short range and short impact tactical ones.

3. To the best of my knowledge Pakistan has more chances of falling into a civil war than India, the reason being the Pakistani govt is run largely by establishment and the leftover power is also concentrated and not devolved unlike India.

4. The purpose of having the nuclear missile clearly shows intention on both side to not rule but destroy the enemy. neither of us are German that would stand up after total destruction.
 

Wake Up Pakistan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
dude relax no need to shout..
1. Pakistan developed/tested the NASR missile (the tactical missile) only recently in 2011. The doctrine is older than that.

2. Thats exactly the reason why we got into the nuclear program to compensate for the non parity in conventional arms and the size of Army. At max our 1 soldier can take out 3 of theirs, our more advance airforce will for sure have starting edge, but the size of our economy, army strength and the fact unlike India, Pakistani land mass is narrow and concentrated along the indian border and hence exposed to the attack (not to mention around 70% of our population are near the indian border) , will result in bleeding out the resources, as it happened in 1965. We could not sustain the war as long as India could, even though we had captured more land early on.

The second strike nuclear submarine is also part of that doctrine. They are equiped with long range strategic nuclear arms rather than the short range and short impact tactical ones.

3. To the best of my knowledge Pakistan has more chances of falling into a civil war than India, the reason being the Pakistani govt is run largely by establishment and the leftover power is also concentrated and not devolved unlike India.

4. The purpose of having the nuclear missile clearly shows intention on both side to not rule but destroy the enemy. neither of us are German that would stand up after total destruction.

sorry i disagree with you.

india have already 10-11 insurgency movements struggling for liberation from india

pakistan have no big threat comparatively. civil war in pakistan is not possible because majority of muslims population they will not fight with each other

establishment is part of society and as i told you before you can win the War with the support of Nation example is Bangladesh they didn't support army we lost.

If i accept your argument then India have no issues to scrap Pakistan. they always wish but they couldn't .
 

ram lal

Senator (1k+ posts)
It's not a prediction but they make a plan and then implement it later on.

The video is published 2 and Half years ago, and there is a high chance that India was Provoked by these evil thinkers to strike within Pakistan and make this plan work, but unfortunately(for them) their evil design failed miserably and they were only able to hit trees with their sophisticated bombs, and so the plan has to wait a little longer, because of course they won't stop attacking what they fear the most.


pakistan is owned and run by army . all fear of war gives boost to pak army and generals .
 

miafridi

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
pakistan is owned and run by army . all fear of war gives boost to pak army and generals .

India Is Run by a Butcher of Gujrat, who killed his own Army personal in Pulwama to create war hysteria for votes and he did get votes..
 

khipk

Senator (1k+ posts)
sorry i disagree with you.

India have already 10-11 insurgency movements struggling for liberation from India

Pakistan have no big threat comparatively. civil war in Pakistan is not possible because majority of Muslims population they will not fight with each other

establishment is part of society and as i told you before you can win the War with the support of Nation example is Bangladesh they didn't support army we lost.

If i accept your argument then India have no issues to scrap Pakistan. they always wish but they couldn't .

Unfortunately , the insurgencies in India are on decline for last 10 years, (except for the Kashmiri one which is on the rise).

As for your notion that majority of Muslims wont fight each other. I can just say lol on that. Pakistan is deeply divided on ethnic lines. Are you day dreaming ? We have had insurgency in Baluchistan, KPK and in Gilgit-Baltistan at one point or another. the former regions of FATA/FANA are also populated by Muslims, former east Pakistan was also muslim majority area, there was also a potential for insurgency in Sindh (after BB assassination, fortunately Zardari controlled it, probably the only good deed he did politically in Pakistan). Our neighboring Afghanistan is also muslim country, so are Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Libya, all of them are in bloody civil wars. This notion of a united Muslim Umma currently doesnt exist,.I think you need to wake up and smell the gutter.

even with all this, its not easy for India to scrap Pakistan as you suggest. But they have inflicted a significant damage to our country, through our western border, using ,... you guessed it another muslim majority country against us.
 

Wake Up Pakistan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Unfortunately , the insurgencies in India are on decline for last 10 years, (except for the Kashmiri one which is on the rise).

As for your notion that majority of Muslims wont fight each other. I can just say lol on that. Pakistan is deeply divided on ethnic lines. Are you day dreaming ? We have had insurgency in Baluchistan, KPK and in Gilgit-Baltistan at one point or another. the former regions of FATA/FANA are also populated by Muslims, former east Pakistan was also muslim majority area, there was also a potential for insurgency in Sindh (after BB assassination, fortunately Zardari controlled it, probably the only good deed he did politically in Pakistan). Our neighboring Afghanistan is also muslim country, so are Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Libya, all of them are in bloody civil wars. This notion of a united Muslim Umma currently doesnt exist,.I think you need to wake up and smell the gutter.

even with all this, its not easy for India to scrap Pakistan as you suggest. But they have inflicted a significant damage to our country, through our western border, using ,... you guessed it another muslim majority country against us.

INDIANS HAVE MORE DIVISION IF U TALKIN ABOUT ETHINICITY

EVEN INDIAN HINDUS HAVE 5 DIVISIONS ON DALIT AT WORST

AND THERE ARE 11 ONGOING INSURGENCIES IN INDIA. THERE ARE ZERO CHANCES

OF CIVIL WAR IN PAKISTAN AS ANY INCIDENT HAPPENED WITH INDIA EVERYBODY

GET READY TO FIGHT AGAINST THEM

THAT WAS MUSHARRAF FAULT TO LEAVE SINDH FREE AFTER THE ASSASSINATION OF BENAZIR

IF MUSHRAF USE RANGERS AND POLICE NOTHING GONNA HAPPENED

IF THEY CAN NEUTRALISE SUCH A STRONG ARMED GANG OF MQM THEN PPP IS NOTHIN

REGARDING AFGANISTAN WE MADE IT UNSECURE ITS NOT BECAUSE OF MUSLIMS COUNTRY

WE HAVE MAKE OUR FRIENDS AS FOES. MUSHARRAF DESTROYED WHOLE NORTHERN BELT WITH AFGHANISTAN AND WE PAID FOR THAT

THINGS HAVE BEEN SETTLED DOWN BUT WILL TAKE LITTLE MORE TIME

AMERICANS AND INDIANS PLANNED IT LONG TIME AGO TO SEPARATE BALOCHISTAN FROM PAKISTAN THEY COULDNT DO IT TILL TODAY

NO MORE BULLL SHIT NOW PLEASE
 

khipk

Senator (1k+ posts)
INDIANS HAVE MORE DIVISION IF U TALKIN ABOUT ETHINICITY

EVEN INDIAN HINDUS HAVE 5 DIVISIONS ON DALIT AT WORST

AND THERE ARE 11 ONGOING INSURGENCIES IN INDIA. THERE ARE ZERO CHANCES

OF CIVIL WAR IN PAKISTAN AS ANY INCIDENT HAPPENED WITH INDIA EVERYBODY

GET READY TO FIGHT AGAINST THEM

THAT WAS MUSHARRAF FAULT TO LEAVE SINDH FREE AFTER THE ASSASSINATION OF BENAZIR

IF MUSHRAF USE RANGERS AND POLICE NOTHING GONNA HAPPENED

IF THEY CAN NEUTRALISE SUCH A STRONG ARMED GANG OF MQM THEN PPP IS NOTHIN

REGARDING AFGANISTAN WE MADE IT UNSECURE ITS NOT BECAUSE OF MUSLIMS COUNTRY

WE HAVE MAKE OUR FRIENDS AS FOES. MUSHARRAF DESTROYED WHOLE NORTHERN BELT WITH AFGHANISTAN AND WE PAID FOR THAT

THINGS HAVE BEEN SETTLED DOWN BUT WILL TAKE LITTLE MORE TIME

AMERICANS AND INDIANS PLANNED IT LONG TIME AGO TO SEPARATE BALOCHISTAN FROM PAKISTAN THEY COULDNT DO IT TILL TODAY

NO MORE BULLL SHIT NOW PLEASE


Lol Lol and Lol.
about neutralizing PPP I would just say try and see. Secondly I didnt say PPP instigated insurgency, it could easily have, but they suppressed it.
Secondly the point was the tendency of local insurgencies to erupt. Third, if Musharrafs decision was so wrong, then why wasnt autonomy restored in FATA instead it was merged.
Third yes, we have history of turning Friends into Foes. And thats one of the main reasons unrest erupts.

Lastly about Indian divisions, yes they have cast based divisions, but when it comes to their country these divisions dont matter. because the divisions are not region based as in Pakistan. There is no specific regional which has only one cast living there, same goes for religious one. Apart from Muslims in Kashmir and Sikhs in Punjab, and very small number of budhists in north. the rest on india is pretty much mixed. There is no region thats home only to Muslims/Dallits/christians/any other caste or religious group. Also, I have been to more than 30 countries till now, pretty much spent more 20 years living abroad, I havent met a single Indian ( even close friends) who would discuss Indian politics or internal problems with others. I cant say the same for Pakistanis. And not just common citizen, prominent ones dont spare either, we have former Pakistani Ambassador speaking regularly against Pakistan. Allmost all of our politicians have reached out publicly and privately to foreign agencies against our establishment, History check: Ghulam Mustafa Kharr went into exile during Zias era, and gave out a statement that we will come back on Indian Tanks.

Again I would repeat, shouting out doesnt make your point stronger, it just makes you look more stupid. Judging by your views and your attitude you dont even seem to be old enough to vote.
 
Last edited:

Wake Up Pakistan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Lol Lol and Lol.
about neutralizing PPP I would just say try and see. Secondly I didnt say PPP instigated insurgency, it could easily have, but they suppressed it.
Secondly the point was the tendency of local insurgencies to erupt. Third, if Musharrafs decision was so wrong, then why wasnt autonomy restored in FATA instead it was merged.
Third yes, we have history of turning Friends into Foes. And thats one of the main reasons unrest erupts.

Lastly about Indian divisions, yes they have cast based divisions, but when it comes to their country these divisions dont matter. because the divisions are not region based as in Pakistan. There is no specific regional which has only one cast living there, same goes for religious one. Apart from Muslims in Kashmir and Sikhs in Punjab, and very small number of budhists in north. the rest on india is pretty much mixed. There is no region thats home only to Muslims/Dallits/christians/any other caste or religious group. Also, I have been to more than 30 countries till now, pretty much spent more 20 years living abroad, I havent met a single Indian ( even close friends) who would discuss Indian politics or internal problems with others. I cant say the same for Pakistanis. And not just common citizen, prominent ones dont spare either, we have former Pakistani Ambassador speaking regularly against Pakistan. Allmost all of our politicians have reached out publicly and privately to foreign agencies against our establishment, History check: Ghulam Mustafa Kharr went into exile during Zias era, and gave out a statement that we will come back on Indian Tanks.

Again I would repeat, shouting out doesnt make your point stronger, it just makes you look more stupid. Judging by your views and your attitude you dont even seem to be old enough to vote.

PATRIOTISM N NATIONALISM WE HAVE THESSE ISSUES IN MUSLIMS WORLD NOT ONLY IN PAKISTAN WHICH IS VERY SAD AND ONE OF MANY REASONS OF MUSLIMS DOWNFALL . HERE I WILL SAY WITH SHAME THAT PAKISTANIS ARE ALWAYS FOR SALE BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN PAKISTAN IS FOR SALE.

ISLAM DISCOURAGE ANY RACE AND ETHNIC BASED DIVISIONS IN MUSLIMS

BALOCHISTAN, KASHMIR, GILGIT & FATA WAS NEVER A PART OF BRITISH INDIA

THEY HAVE VOTED TO BE PART OF PAKISTAN BECAUSE OF ONLY ONE REASON THAT IS ISLAM

MAY BE TO SOME EXTENT STRATEGIC / REGIONAL I DON'T DENY

INDIAN HAVE MORE FAULT LINES AS YOU ALREADY MENTIONED. IT IS FAITH WHO GIVE YOU STRENGTH IN WARS NOT YOUR POWER OR AMRED SUPREMACY.

MUSLIMS NEVER SCARED OF DEATH THATS WHY WE PAKISTAN IS NOT ARMY OF 600,000 PERSONAL ITS 220MILL.
 

ram lal

Senator (1k+ posts)
U HAVE NO INFORMATION HOW NUKES WORKS.

WE HAVE A SMALL TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON FOR DESTRUCTION OF LIMITED AREA AND REGION.

AND KEEP DREAMING OUR WHOLE ARMY FINISHED

WAR NOT ALWAYS WIN BY ARMY BUT PEOPLE

EVEN IF WHOLE PAK ARMY DIED THERE WILL BE GORILLA WAR AGANST INDIA AND CIVIL WAR WITHIN INDIA AS WELL

look at this chutia ............tactical nuke ............ ? ? ? ?

thlol-1.gif~c200
 

Ijazahmad@pak

New Member
All of sudden demolished by air Force , recently your co-pilot or something else lost his senses over pak jet at kashmiri border and he decided to make a suicide as per your kind info he was drunk.and next he found humanity andba cup of tea between strangers in special zone.you will deliver all of your best words just to complete lines but allusions.Respect bringing victory for nation's strategic war which is not good there in India.simply you are pushing India in civil war.
 

Back
Top