idiots its between party heads who suppose to be ruler(Prime minister candidates) not chaprasii
Akheer, Zabardast
idiots its between party heads who suppose to be ruler(Prime minister candidates) not chaprasii
The agenda will be very similar to what you have suggested.People are not interested in the leader's private lives.People want to knowI think the only thing that can make this debate more acceptable for both parties that there should be a discussion on policies, no live audience which can make this debate absolute failure.
The debate should not be on accusations of different charges on each other.
1- Economic policy ( both leaders should give their fundamental policy about economic changes
2- Foriegn policy ( both leaders should give their policy statements on foriegn affairs)
3- Education policy ( both leaders should be given chance to talk about their educational policy)
4-Terrorism ( Policy statement on terrorism)
5 Health Policy
in the end selected questions from jury without cross questioning,
thts how debates we used to see in europe.. I really dont see any harm for both parties if this debate will happen.
![]()
Different qualities such as gambling, playboy, U-Turn Masters, Liar, Back biter, immature, wow I congratulate you to have such a great leader. Surely you deserve that.
![]()
idiots its between party heads who suppose to be ruler(Prime minister candidates) not chaprasii
ik has no level so get a life pti walo.pakistan tehreek e ilzam
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|