Imran khan and Altaf Hussain Love marriage :)

[Ammad Hafeez]

Read Carefully if some stance was good that does not mean that he supports MQM :D

I think u had too much of choran overdose

You didn't reply on my post, till yet...

IMRAN KHAN has clearly said that not ALLIANCE WITH MQM

I heard, MQM is our Natural alliance : Imran Khan

 

[Raheem]

Finally PML (N) 's Media Cell which has been allocated a budget of Rs. 10 Crore, has started working !!!

But, let me remind you this isn't 1997. This time we will reply you with videos & pictures , which will embarrass your leaders in Public. Wait up till elections !!! You will hate your own leader Nawaz Sharif. Meanwhile you can read Taliban Shuffle !!!

IMRAN KHAN WILL BRING THE CHANGE. Corrupt people and there children (like you) will leave the country or will face trial !!!

Could you please provide proof, other wise you are a munafiq, according to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

 

[Super123]

Could you please provide proof, other wise you are a munafiq, according to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)

Hey arrogant before calling me a Munafiq, It was on TV News, If PML(N) should file for a law suit if its incorrect !!!
Where is the money of Qarz utaro mulk sawaro ? The billion dollar property in london , where is the records of tax paid ? How you bought it when almost every company of your leader is in loss? You are a Munafiq according to Prophet Muhammad S.A.W !!!
Why Nawaz Sharif ran out of country like Chicken. "Jabi Hukmran ke khilaf kalma-e-haq kehna behtreen Jihad hai". (Bukhari Shareef).
Read Taliban Shuffle. Why not file a law suit against the author, if she is wrong, take her to court !

A fresh bank statement was also distributed in the press conference, in which it was claimed that the Sharif brothers’ Ittefaq Group was a defaulter of the BoP, National Bank, Habib Bank, United Bank, Muslim Commercial Bank, Punjab Mudarba Bank, Agriculture Development Bank, PICIC and ICP. The PML-Q leaders also read a statement by Hamesh Khan that was filed in the US Department of State, through his lawyers, which said that Punjab Chief Minsiter Shahbaz Sharif had pressurised him (Hamesh) to establish him as an approver against former chief minister Ch Pervaiz Elahi and his son Monis Elahi. They said that Hamesh, the main accused in the BoP and Haris Steel Mills case, had also declared Pervaiz Elahi and Monis Elahi as “neat and clean personalities” because they had not used any unfair means to make money and were not defaulters of any bank, adding that after Hamesh’s statement, the “real faces of defaulters and looters of the national exchequer had been exposed”
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\05\17\story_17-5-2010_pg7_9

Shahbaz was willing to have CJ removed after ‘face-saving’ restoration

KARACHI: Even as PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif was rallying street support by publicly refusing to back down from demands for the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in February and March 2009, the party was privately telling American diplomats that the future of the then-non-functional chief justice was up for negotiation.

“Shahbaz stated that following the restoration, the PML-N was prepared to end the issue and remove Chaudhry once and for all,” reported Lahore Consulate Principal Officer Bryan Hunt in a secret American diplomatic cable describing his meeting with the younger Sharif on March 14, 2009.

“On the issue of former Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, Shahbaz claimed that the PML-N was open to negotiation, provided that Chaudhry was symbolically restored.”

The conversation took place just a day before Nawaz Sharif would join a lawyers’ long march in a dramatic public protest for the reinstatement of judges deposed by Gen Musharraf, a demand that President Zardari had been resisting. In private, however, a different story was being told.

“Shahbaz stressed that his party could not afford the political humiliation of abandoning what had become a long-standing principle in favour of Chaudhry’s restoration,” Mr Hunt reported. “At the same time, Shahbaz claimed to understand that Chaudhry was a problematic jurist, whose powers would need to be carefully curtailed.”

Shahbaz Sharif strategised that as a judge who had taken oath under Gen Musharraf’s first provisional constitutional order, Chaudhry could be removed – once “some sort of face-saving restoration” had been carried out – “by adopting legislation proposed in the Charter of Democracy that would ban all judges who had taken an oath under a PCO from serving.”

A week earlier, in another meeting at the Lahore consulate, Shahbaz Sharif had proposed an alternative solution: creating the Constitutional Court envisioned in the Charter of Democracy and ensuring that “it be made superior to the Supreme Court. Iftikhar Chaudhry’s restoration … would then have little measurable impact, as the Constitutional Court, staffed by appointees from both parties, could nullify his decisions.”

Even before the restoration, Shahbaz Sharif confided, the PML-N leadership would agree to any constraints President Zardari might want placed on Chaudhry, “including curtailment of his powers to create judicial benches, removal of his suo motu jurisdiction, and/or establishment of a constitutional court as a check on the Supreme Court.”

“Although Nawaz publicly has said Chaudhry’s restoration is also a red line,” commented US Ambassador Anne Patterson in a separate report, “no leader in Pakistan really wants an activist and unpredictable Chief Justice. … Nawaz emerges stronger in the public eye and retains the ‘high moral ground’ by defending the judiciary.”

As late as January 22, in fact, PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique had told Mr Hunt that a minimum requirement for saving the coalition with the PPP in Punjab was “full retirement of Chief Justice Hameed Dogar and appointment of Justice Sardar Raza in his place.” Chaudhry did not seem to have been a concern.

But by March 2009 he had become the PML-N’s rallying cry, and the timing clearly had to do with political developments at the time: a February 25 Supreme Court decision had declared the Sharif brothers ineligible for office, and the president had imposed governor’s rule in Punjab.

“Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif told Principal Officer Lahore that the decision [to declare them ineligible to hold public office], which they claimed was entirely Zardari’s, was a declaration of war; they would … take their battle to the streets. Following the decision, PML-N certainly will participate in the lawyers’ march,” reported a February 2009 cable previously published in the media.

“Before the Court ruling, ‘95 per cent of the party’ had opposed joining the lawyers’ March 16 sit-in because it might lead to violence,” Opposition Leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan revealed privately in a separate conversation at the US embassy.

“Now, the party had little choice but to support them.”

Cables referenced: WikiLeaks # 196903, 195758, 196939, 188203, 193807, 194540. All cables are available on Dawn.com.
http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/20/shah...cj-removed-after-face-saving-restoration.html

Nawaz Sharif faces murder inquiry

By Syed Shoaib Hasan
BBC News, Islamabad


Mr Sharif is one of the most popular politicians in Pakistan
Pakistan's Supreme court is set to hear petitions seeking the prosecution of the main opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif, for murder.
According to documents obtained by the BBC, the court will hear the accusations against Mr Sharif and then decide whether to pursue the charges.
The petitions call for Mr Sharif's arrest and prosecution.
He has denied ordering the murder of an ex-army officer after an alleged political kickbacks deal turned sour.
Nawaz Sharif, twice elected as Pakistan's prime minister, has recently been acquitted of similar criminal charges by the Supreme Court.
The court's decision was made on 21 July but it is expected to begin its inquiries imminently.
'Vindication'
"This is a false and totally politically motivated accusation," Ehsan Iqbal, spokesman for Mr Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party, told the BBC.
"This is only the latest in a series of recent accusations against Mr Sharif.
"The presidency and hidden hands are trying to pressurise him into backing down on his demand for prosecuting (former President) Musharraf."
However, the main petitioner in the case, Shahid Orakzai, said that the court ruling was the vindication of a long struggle.
"It has taken 12 years for the truth to prevail," said Mr Orakzai.
His brother, Maj Khalidsaeed Orakzai, was shot dead by unidentified gunmen in the northern town of Kohat in 1997.
Shahid Orakzai, a freelance journalist, says his brother was murdered because he went public with a political kickbacks deal.
The deal dates back to 1993 and allegedly involved Mr Sharif and senior party leaders.
At that time Mr Orakzai arranged a deal between them and parliamentarians from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
The deal involved the payment of 10 million rupees to the parliamentarians in return for their support for the PML-N candidate for Speaker of Pakistan's parliament.
But the PML-N reneged on payment after the the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) candidate won the election.
This led to Mr Orakzai going public with the deal and asking the chief election commissioner (CEC) to take action.
However, the CEC refused and the matter ended up in court.
Eventually, the court accepted that the deal had taken place and Mr Orakzai's persistence led to awkward questions for Mr Sharif.
Mr Orakzai alleges that Mr Sharif subsequently ordered his brother to be murdered.
"It is utter rubbish and just part of a scheme to launch a character assassination of Mr Sharif," said Mr Iqbal.
"Mr Orakzai has often made himself part of petitions against Mr Sharif and everybody knows his connections to the intelligence agencies.
"If we are issued notices, we will deal with them, although we aren't too worried about them."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8244606.stm
Pakistani Report Alleges Graft by Ex-Premier
By TIM WEINER
Published: October 26, 1999
Pakistan's deposed Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, skimmed hundreds of millions of dollars from public works, wheat imports, sugar exports and other Government projects, according to detailed records compiled by the nation's most prominent criminal investigator.

Mr. Sharif, already under investigation by the nation's new military Government for obtaining huge unsecured loans from state banks, enriched himself, his family and his friends in Government deals he conducted as Prime Minister, according to evidence compiled by the investigator, Rehman Malik.

''He was running the Government like his own private business,'' Mr. Malik said in an interview.

Mr. Malik says he has hundreds of pages of records describing Mr. Sharif's use of state power for profit. They appear to document a decade of graft.

It began when Mr. Sharif was a rising politician in the 1980's, grew during his first term as Prime Minister, from 1991 to 1993, when he was dismissed by Pakistan's President on corruption charges, and continued in his second term, from 1997 until he was replaced in a military coup two weeks ago, the records show.


Since the coup, Mr. Sharif is being held under house arrest and could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Malik, 47, was director-general of Pakistan's Federal Investigative Agency, its equivalent of the F.B.I., and technically still holds the post, though this month's coup has suspended the work of Government agencies in Pakistan.

Mr. Malik has spent five years looking into Mr. Sharif's financial practices.

Jailed by Mr. Sharif after his re-election in 1997, freed and exonerated by Pakistan's Supreme Court a year later, he lives in exile in London. He is well known at the F.B.I., the State Department and the Secret Service, having helped to arrest Ramzi Yousef, the convicted mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing, and his associates in 1995.

The records, including Government documents, signed affidavits from Pakistani officials, bank files and property records, detail deals that Mr. Malik says benefited Mr. Sharif, his family and his political associates:

*At least $160 million pocketed from a contract to build a highway from Lahore, his home town, to Islamabad, the nation's capital. The money, he says, was generated by an inflated bid accepted by Mr. Sharif. Mr. Malik says the extra $160 million took the form of a gift to Prime Minister Sharif and his associates.

*At least $140 million in unsecured loans from Pakistan's state banks, which he says went to finance companies owned or controlled by Mr. Sharif.

*More than $60 million generated from Government rebates on sugar exported by mills controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates.

*At least $58 million skimmed from inflated prices paid for imported wheat from the United States and Canada.

In the wheat deal, Mr. Sharif's Government paid prices far above market value to a private company owned by a close associate of his in Washington, the records show. Falsely inflated invoices for the wheat generated tens of millions of dollars in cash.

On Monday, Pakistan's new military ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, appointed Mohammed Yaqub, governor of the State Bank of Pakistan and a 20-year veteran of the International Monetary Fund, as a member of a new National Security Council to run Pakistan.

Mr. Yaqub's tasks will include hunting down at least $4 billion in unsecured loans from state banks -- including hundreds of millions borrowed by Mr. Sharif and his associates -- that have disappeared in recent years.

Charges of political graft are nothing new in Pakistan. Mr. Sharif's predecessor, Benazir Bhutto, has been convicted on corruption charges in Pakistan, though she argues that the charges were trumped up by Mr. Sharif and pliant prosecutors.

Mr. Malik's evidence includes several intricate examples of what Mr. Malik calls money laundering through a global network of businesses, banks and bogus transactions from Lahore to London.

In one case, he has traced the flow of $7.85 million, including borrowed Government funds, from Mr. Sharif's family business, the Ittefaq Group. The money was transferred through money-changers in the open-air bazaars of Peshawar, Pakistan, through five accounts at the Bank of Oman, a Persian Gulf emirate, to 43 members of Mr. Sharif's extended family.

In another case, Mr. Malik tracked $1.85 million channeled through a Swiss bank to accounts in Washington, London, Pakistan and the British Virgin Islands that he said were controlled by Mr. Sharif, his family and his friends.

And in a third case, he said, Mr. Sharif engineered Government policy for profit.

Last year, Mr. Sharif's Government, desperately seeking foreign currency, exported 350,000 tons of sugar to India. To spur the exports, the Government offered a rebate to sugar manufacturers of about 10 cents a pound.

There was a catch: the sugar would have to be exported by rail. The Government runs the railroads. And when the trains were ready to be loaded, at least 90 percent of the rail cars were reserved for sugar produced by companies controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates, Mr. Malik said.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/26/w...sq=nawaz sharif 1991&st=cse&pagewanted=print

His son owns it, how he purchased it, if he dn't have money !!!
http://www.flagshipinvestments.co.uk !!
IF PML(N) wants this kind of reply we can also give worst reply than that!! But, IMRAN KHAN never allows us to do so or to get Personal. However, you can have a look at it !!!

Puri dunya mein sirf tum sache ho !!! Tum Munafiq ho jo sach ko bhi jhoot kehte ho !!!
Agar dil na bhare to batana bohat kuch tumhe parhane ke liye Nawaz Sharif per bhi aur PML (N) per bhi !!!
ONE ADVICE: DON't GET PERSONAL OTHERWISE IT WOULD BE UGLY !!! THANKS

 

[Raheem]

Hey arrogant before calling me a Munafiq, It was on TV News, If PML(N) should file for a law suit if its incorrect !!!
Where is the money of Qarz utaro mulk sawaro ? The billion dollar property in london , where is the records of tax paid ? How you bought it when almost every company of your leader is in loss? You are a Munafiq according to Prophet Muhammad S.A.W !!!
Why Nawaz Sharif ran out of country like Chicken. "Jabi Hukmran ke khilaf kalma-e-haq kehna behtreen Jihad hai". (Bukhari Shareef).
Read Taliban Shuffle. Why not file a law suit against the author, if she is wrong, take her to court !

A fresh bank statement was also distributed in the press conference, in which it was claimed that the Sharif brothers’ Ittefaq Group was a defaulter of the BoP, National Bank, Habib Bank, United Bank, Muslim Commercial Bank, Punjab Mudarba Bank, Agriculture Development Bank, PICIC and ICP. The PML-Q leaders also read a statement by Hamesh Khan that was filed in the US Department of State, through his lawyers, which said that Punjab Chief Minsiter Shahbaz Sharif had pressurised him (Hamesh) to establish him as an approver against former chief minister Ch Pervaiz Elahi and his son Monis Elahi. They said that Hamesh, the main accused in the BoP and Haris Steel Mills case, had also declared Pervaiz Elahi and Monis Elahi as “neat and clean personalities” because they had not used any unfair means to make money and were not defaulters of any bank, adding that after Hamesh’s statement, the “real faces of defaulters and looters of the national exchequer had been exposed”
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010\05\17\story_17-5-2010_pg7_9

Shahbaz was willing to have CJ removed after ‘face-saving’ restoration

KARACHI: Even as PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif was rallying street support by publicly refusing to back down from demands for the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in February and March 2009, the party was privately telling American diplomats that the future of the then-non-functional chief justice was up for negotiation.

“Shahbaz stated that following the restoration, the PML-N was prepared to end the issue and remove Chaudhry once and for all,” reported Lahore Consulate Principal Officer Bryan Hunt in a secret American diplomatic cable describing his meeting with the younger Sharif on March 14, 2009.

“On the issue of former Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, Shahbaz claimed that the PML-N was open to negotiation, provided that Chaudhry was symbolically restored.”

The conversation took place just a day before Nawaz Sharif would join a lawyers’ long march in a dramatic public protest for the reinstatement of judges deposed by Gen Musharraf, a demand that President Zardari had been resisting. In private, however, a different story was being told.

“Shahbaz stressed that his party could not afford the political humiliation of abandoning what had become a long-standing principle in favour of Chaudhry’s restoration,” Mr Hunt reported. “At the same time, Shahbaz claimed to understand that Chaudhry was a problematic jurist, whose powers would need to be carefully curtailed.”

Shahbaz Sharif strategised that as a judge who had taken oath under Gen Musharraf’s first provisional constitutional order, Chaudhry could be removed – once “some sort of face-saving restoration” had been carried out – “by adopting legislation proposed in the Charter of Democracy that would ban all judges who had taken an oath under a PCO from serving.”

A week earlier, in another meeting at the Lahore consulate, Shahbaz Sharif had proposed an alternative solution: creating the Constitutional Court envisioned in the Charter of Democracy and ensuring that “it be made superior to the Supreme Court. Iftikhar Chaudhry’s restoration … would then have little measurable impact, as the Constitutional Court, staffed by appointees from both parties, could nullify his decisions.”

Even before the restoration, Shahbaz Sharif confided, the PML-N leadership would agree to any constraints President Zardari might want placed on Chaudhry, “including curtailment of his powers to create judicial benches, removal of his suo motu jurisdiction, and/or establishment of a constitutional court as a check on the Supreme Court.”

“Although Nawaz publicly has said Chaudhry’s restoration is also a red line,” commented US Ambassador Anne Patterson in a separate report, “no leader in Pakistan really wants an activist and unpredictable Chief Justice. … Nawaz emerges stronger in the public eye and retains the ‘high moral ground’ by defending the judiciary.”

As late as January 22, in fact, PML-N leader Khawaja Saad Rafique had told Mr Hunt that a minimum requirement for saving the coalition with the PPP in Punjab was “full retirement of Chief Justice Hameed Dogar and appointment of Justice Sardar Raza in his place.” Chaudhry did not seem to have been a concern.

But by March 2009 he had become the PML-N’s rallying cry, and the timing clearly had to do with political developments at the time: a February 25 Supreme Court decision had declared the Sharif brothers ineligible for office, and the president had imposed governor’s rule in Punjab.

“Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif told Principal Officer Lahore that the decision [to declare them ineligible to hold public office], which they claimed was entirely Zardari’s, was a declaration of war; they would … take their battle to the streets. Following the decision, PML-N certainly will participate in the lawyers’ march,” reported a February 2009 cable previously published in the media.

“Before the Court ruling, ‘95 per cent of the party’ had opposed joining the lawyers’ March 16 sit-in because it might lead to violence,” Opposition Leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan revealed privately in a separate conversation at the US embassy.

“Now, the party had little choice but to support them.”

Cables referenced: WikiLeaks # 196903, 195758, 196939, 188203, 193807, 194540. All cables are available on Dawn.com.
http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/20/shah...cj-removed-after-face-saving-restoration.html

Nawaz Sharif faces murder inquiry

By Syed Shoaib Hasan
BBC News, Islamabad


Mr Sharif is one of the most popular politicians in Pakistan
Pakistan's Supreme court is set to hear petitions seeking the prosecution of the main opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif, for murder.
According to documents obtained by the BBC, the court will hear the accusations against Mr Sharif and then decide whether to pursue the charges.
The petitions call for Mr Sharif's arrest and prosecution.
He has denied ordering the murder of an ex-army officer after an alleged political kickbacks deal turned sour.
Nawaz Sharif, twice elected as Pakistan's prime minister, has recently been acquitted of similar criminal charges by the Supreme Court.
The court's decision was made on 21 July but it is expected to begin its inquiries imminently.
'Vindication'
"This is a false and totally politically motivated accusation," Ehsan Iqbal, spokesman for Mr Sharif's Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party, told the BBC.
"This is only the latest in a series of recent accusations against Mr Sharif.
"The presidency and hidden hands are trying to pressurise him into backing down on his demand for prosecuting (former President) Musharraf."
However, the main petitioner in the case, Shahid Orakzai, said that the court ruling was the vindication of a long struggle.
"It has taken 12 years for the truth to prevail," said Mr Orakzai.
His brother, Maj Khalidsaeed Orakzai, was shot dead by unidentified gunmen in the northern town of Kohat in 1997.
Shahid Orakzai, a freelance journalist, says his brother was murdered because he went public with a political kickbacks deal.
The deal dates back to 1993 and allegedly involved Mr Sharif and senior party leaders.
At that time Mr Orakzai arranged a deal between them and parliamentarians from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
The deal involved the payment of 10 million rupees to the parliamentarians in return for their support for the PML-N candidate for Speaker of Pakistan's parliament.
But the PML-N reneged on payment after the the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) candidate won the election.
This led to Mr Orakzai going public with the deal and asking the chief election commissioner (CEC) to take action.
However, the CEC refused and the matter ended up in court.
Eventually, the court accepted that the deal had taken place and Mr Orakzai's persistence led to awkward questions for Mr Sharif.
Mr Orakzai alleges that Mr Sharif subsequently ordered his brother to be murdered.
"It is utter rubbish and just part of a scheme to launch a character assassination of Mr Sharif," said Mr Iqbal.
"Mr Orakzai has often made himself part of petitions against Mr Sharif and everybody knows his connections to the intelligence agencies.
"If we are issued notices, we will deal with them, although we aren't too worried about them."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8244606.stm
Pakistani Report Alleges Graft by Ex-Premier
By TIM WEINER
Published: October 26, 1999
Pakistan's deposed Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, skimmed hundreds of millions of dollars from public works, wheat imports, sugar exports and other Government projects, according to detailed records compiled by the nation's most prominent criminal investigator.

Mr. Sharif, already under investigation by the nation's new military Government for obtaining huge unsecured loans from state banks, enriched himself, his family and his friends in Government deals he conducted as Prime Minister, according to evidence compiled by the investigator, Rehman Malik.

''He was running the Government like his own private business,'' Mr. Malik said in an interview.

Mr. Malik says he has hundreds of pages of records describing Mr. Sharif's use of state power for profit. They appear to document a decade of graft.

It began when Mr. Sharif was a rising politician in the 1980's, grew during his first term as Prime Minister, from 1991 to 1993, when he was dismissed by Pakistan's President on corruption charges, and continued in his second term, from 1997 until he was replaced in a military coup two weeks ago, the records show.


Since the coup, Mr. Sharif is being held under house arrest and could not be reached for comment.

Mr. Malik, 47, was director-general of Pakistan's Federal Investigative Agency, its equivalent of the F.B.I., and technically still holds the post, though this month's coup has suspended the work of Government agencies in Pakistan.

Mr. Malik has spent five years looking into Mr. Sharif's financial practices.

Jailed by Mr. Sharif after his re-election in 1997, freed and exonerated by Pakistan's Supreme Court a year later, he lives in exile in London. He is well known at the F.B.I., the State Department and the Secret Service, having helped to arrest Ramzi Yousef, the convicted mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing, and his associates in 1995.

The records, including Government documents, signed affidavits from Pakistani officials, bank files and property records, detail deals that Mr. Malik says benefited Mr. Sharif, his family and his political associates:

*At least $160 million pocketed from a contract to build a highway from Lahore, his home town, to Islamabad, the nation's capital. The money, he says, was generated by an inflated bid accepted by Mr. Sharif. Mr. Malik says the extra $160 million took the form of a gift to Prime Minister Sharif and his associates.

*At least $140 million in unsecured loans from Pakistan's state banks, which he says went to finance companies owned or controlled by Mr. Sharif.

*More than $60 million generated from Government rebates on sugar exported by mills controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates.

*At least $58 million skimmed from inflated prices paid for imported wheat from the United States and Canada.

In the wheat deal, Mr. Sharif's Government paid prices far above market value to a private company owned by a close associate of his in Washington, the records show. Falsely inflated invoices for the wheat generated tens of millions of dollars in cash.

On Monday, Pakistan's new military ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, appointed Mohammed Yaqub, governor of the State Bank of Pakistan and a 20-year veteran of the International Monetary Fund, as a member of a new National Security Council to run Pakistan.

Mr. Yaqub's tasks will include hunting down at least $4 billion in unsecured loans from state banks -- including hundreds of millions borrowed by Mr. Sharif and his associates -- that have disappeared in recent years.

Charges of political graft are nothing new in Pakistan. Mr. Sharif's predecessor, Benazir Bhutto, has been convicted on corruption charges in Pakistan, though she argues that the charges were trumped up by Mr. Sharif and pliant prosecutors.

Mr. Malik's evidence includes several intricate examples of what Mr. Malik calls money laundering through a global network of businesses, banks and bogus transactions from Lahore to London.

In one case, he has traced the flow of $7.85 million, including borrowed Government funds, from Mr. Sharif's family business, the Ittefaq Group. The money was transferred through money-changers in the open-air bazaars of Peshawar, Pakistan, through five accounts at the Bank of Oman, a Persian Gulf emirate, to 43 members of Mr. Sharif's extended family.

In another case, Mr. Malik tracked $1.85 million channeled through a Swiss bank to accounts in Washington, London, Pakistan and the British Virgin Islands that he said were controlled by Mr. Sharif, his family and his friends.

And in a third case, he said, Mr. Sharif engineered Government policy for profit.

Last year, Mr. Sharif's Government, desperately seeking foreign currency, exported 350,000 tons of sugar to India. To spur the exports, the Government offered a rebate to sugar manufacturers of about 10 cents a pound.

There was a catch: the sugar would have to be exported by rail. The Government runs the railroads. And when the trains were ready to be loaded, at least 90 percent of the rail cars were reserved for sugar produced by companies controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates, Mr. Malik said.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/26/w...sq=nawaz sharif 1991&st=cse&pagewanted=print

His son owns it, how he purchased it, if he dn't have money !!!
http://www.flagshipinvestments.co.uk !!
IF PML(N) wants this kind of reply we can also give worst reply than that!! But, IMRAN KHAN never allows us to do so or to get Personal. However, you can have a look at it !!!

Puri dunya mein sirf tum sache ho !!! Tum Munafiq ho jo sach ko bhi jhoot kehte ho !!!
Agar dil na bhare to batana bohat kuch tumhe parhane ke liye Nawaz Sharif per bhi aur PML (N) per bhi !!!
ONE ADVICE: DON't GET PERSONAL OTHERWISE IT WOULD BE UGLY !!! THANKS

Sorry yar , it is true , i Should not have said you munafiq, but the fact is these are just rumors that PML(N) has allocated 10 crore to defame IMRAN, his chracter you know and i know does not need any defaming, now he is making alliance with MQM, what a JERK he is, Once again, i should not have called you munafiq, I am really sorry

 

[Super123]

Imran Khan is not making any alliance with MQM, as per my knowledge after talking to some Party officials. PTI wants to ensure safety of its workers for that they talked to MQM. After, some of the workers were threatened by MQM workers.
MQM can be a better party, if they get rid of there Millitant Wing !!