You have a habit of running away from arguments after you're called out on your lies. I hope you will stay to back up your claims.
HK was granted autonomy for at least 50 years AFTER the lease ended. The lease ended on 1st July 1997. That didn't stop the devilish Chinese commies to violate HK freedom just like India has.
And recently now China is annexing HK slowly with a new extradition treaty that will make Chinese commie devils disappear any HK citizens just like they've been doing with Uighurs.
HK wants capitalism and democracy and it hates China just like Kashmiris hate India and want to be Pakistan. That doesn't stop China and India from intruding on the freedom of people for their monetary benefits.
So the question is why are you fine with China violating its agreement and not waiting for 50 years before fucking up HK? But you cry crocodile tears for Kashmiris and have a problem with India violating their agreement? Because China is giving Pakistan money? If India gave Pakistan money then you would be okay too?
You said something that makes me proud. I loathe the Chinese for Allah. You have no idea of the hatred i have for Chinese because they're forcing my Uighurs Muslims to commit Shirk. I imagine myself in my Uighurs brethren shoes and my blood boils, my head fumes just imagining a Chinese ching chong commie fuck forcing me to utter profanities against Islam?
I am not a good Muslim but by Allah, la ilaha illallah muhammadur rasulullah (saww) is more dear to me than anything in this world and China is taking that away from my Muslim brothers. May Allah destroy a million Pakistans if it means one Uighurs emaan is saved.
I don't know if my efforts for Uighurs will be accepted by Allah or if i will be among the hypocrites (May Allah save me) but if even one Uighur has lost his emaan due to Chinese commie pigs, they're my nemesis.
I wonder how do you people keep your conscience quiet, you offer your prayers, you earn great sawab in Ramadan, you don't drink alcohol and don't eat pork and enjoy the good that comes with being a Muslim but at the same time, your blood doesn't boil when our Uighurs brethren ARE FORCED TO EAT PORK, TO FORNICATE, TO DRINK ALCOHOL, TO NOT FAST OR PRAY AND to utter profanities against Islam.
Don't you fear that if Allah asked you you brought all these good deeds for yourself but you never worried and spoke for Uighurs who were forced to commit Shirk in fact, you attacked anyone who spoke for Uighurs.
Makes me sick to my stomach that Muslims of all people oppose me when i speak against this Muslim holocaust and the Kuffars are the ones who are speaking against oppression.
So, you are still raising the bogie of HK to counter the Pak-china cooperation on Kashmir - even in the face of a possible war. Indian's motivation to defect focus from Kashmir issue is understandable but what's your intention except imo only intense hatred of the current administration or maybe love of muslims as you claim. Anyhow you are your own judge but still so much hatred is not good for health.
China or HK are none of my concern but Kashmir and India are --. My reply is only to counter your attempt for misinformation. (Please call whatever names you like but we aren't bound by your myopic views and negative politics or by Indian talking points)
Your attempt to create alikeness to HK is false, illogical and perhaps ill-intended.
First, HK was an occupied colony and democratic system before handover was farce; it was exploited by UK business interest. Second, Pakistan has always stood that HK is part of China even when Pakistan was bound in several western pacts and the whole world stood against China on HK issue.
China made an agreement with UK when it was handed back control of HK. (if according to you there is any violation of the agreement, UK may raise the issue - but there are none except for the internal political issues in HK).
Even in 80's it was not hard for china to unify the country through force but China waited for peaceful transfer. Their main issue is and was Taiwan not HK; - One country Two systems provides a viable roadmap for future unification for Taiwan and discouraged the separatist politics. Further China needed and is to maintain for decades an economic window to the West and it is no going to violate that principle (though as the economic power and status of mainland rises, there will be internal pressure in HK for more integration and cooperation. Under the agreement, HK is under mainland's jurisdiction and legal system and further mainland citizen's/migrants are allowed to participate in the political process. China can always use the instrument of migration to impose her will if wished but doesn't.
One country-two systems principal is intact and there is no reason to think that it will change. Rather in the last three decades (since ‘85), China has considerably moved towards capitalism and that policy will continue for coming times. The rest of the political problems and conflicts are subject to the integrated legal system of HK and mainland. Now what had led to 2014 protests; There was a political party and a movement which was active for separation from motherland (which of course was in violation of the China-UK agreement , a historical document) only imo) China had claimed that the movement was supported by foreign governments and by anti-China Chinese from abroad. Beijing responded with a slogan 'love mainland and then love HK", that was aimed to shun openly separatist candidates and parties from contesting elections. Beijing devised a formula that the candidates will be whetted and voted by a (large) nominating committee before general elections. Of course that put a limit to free elections but how many countries tolerate separatists with open agenda and interference with foreign fund. (This is just a phase and as the time will pass HK will seek for more integration hopefully even before 2047. Last election in HK showed that trend and how much so-called democratic have support of the people.
And why HK’s extradition bill is your concern- HK has extradition agreements with 20+ countries; If any thing is wrong, HK’s legal system will look into it. At the core of the bill is murderer fugitive from Taiwan. In any case under the pact with UK, defense and foreign affairs are concerns of Beijing exclusively. In any case, have no opinion nor think Pak should interfere in an internal matter - even UK takes the same position. On contrary, Kashmir is a internationally recognized disputed territory and unilateral actions are illegal. It is an entirely different issue. Further Pak is a party to the conflict and Kashmiri people are close to our hearts; Pak took many refugees due to this conflict.
It is futile to find parallels however you may explain why HK or china is brought forward whenever Kashmir issue is raised. Are you opposed to Pak-Chine military and economic cooperation? Do you suggest that Pak should become a vessel to India a fake wannabe superpower? What’s the final goal. What's your
Real-politik. However I assume hopefully there is none else but intense hatred - I might be wrong and there may be some nobility where I see none. You may happily have the last word in this exchange! You maybe a greater muslim, but have countered prosecution of muslims and misconceptions about Islam after 911 on several forums and talks, whatever my personal opinions about religion may or not may be.
