How Has Bangladesh Left Pakistan Behind in Per Capita Income?

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
A headline in the Economist magazine's recent issue screams: "Bangladesh's GDP per person is now higher than Pakistan's". Let's examine this development to understand its causes.

Per Capita GDP:

The Economist article explains its headline as follows: "Last month revealed a remarkable turnaround. Bangladesh’s GDP per person is now higher than Pakistan’s. Converted into dollars at market exchange rates, it was $1,538 in the past fiscal year (which ended on June 30th). Pakistan’s was about $1,470....Strange as it may sound, Bangladesh jumped ahead because of an advance in Pakistan. On August 25th Pakistan released the results of its census, updating earlier population estimates. They showed that the country has 207.8m people, more than 9m more than previously thought. It may now have the fifth biggest population in the world, surpassing Brazil’s. But the new count also lopped 4-5% off Pakistan’s GDP per person, the arithmetic consequence of revealing so many more people."

Economic Growth Trends:

One can quibble with the Economist on details of its report but the fact remains that Bangladesh's economy has been growing significantly faster than Pakistan's for about a decade. To understand why, it's important to look into savings and investments, population growth trends and security situation in the two countries. Let's examine each in a little more detail.

Investment%2Bto%2BGDP%2BRatio%2BSouth%2BAsia.png
Source: State Bank of Pakistan

Savings and Investment:

There's a strong relationship between investment levels and gross domestic product. The more a country saves and invests, the higher its economic growth. A State Bank of Pakistan report explains it as below:

"National savings (in Pakistan) as percent of GDP were around 10 percent during 1960s, which increased to above 15percent in 2000s, but declined afterward. Pakistan’s saving rate also compares unfavorably with that in neighboring countries: last five years average saving rate in India was 31.9 percent, Bangladesh 29.7 percent, and Sri Lanka 24.5 percent..... Similarly, domestic savings (measured as national savings less net factor income from abroad) also declined from about 15 percent of GDP in 2000s, to less than 9 percent in recent years. Domestic savings are imperative for sustainable growth, because inflow of income from abroad (remittances and other factor income) is uncertain due to cyclical movements in world economies, exchange rates, and external shocks".

Net%2BFDI%2Bin%2BSouth%2BAsia.png
Source: State Bank of Pakistan

Population Trends:

The total fertility rate (TFR) in Bangladesh has declined faster in Bangladesh than in Pakistan in the last few decades. Currently, Bangladesh is at 2.17 children per woman while Pakistan is at 2.62 children per woman.

As a result of reduced birth rates and more female labor participation rates, a larger percentage of Bangladeshi population is in the work force than Pakistan's. There are now more wage earners and fewer dependents in each Bangladeshi household. This demographic trend has helped boost Bangladesh's per capita income faster than Pakistan's.

Rising working age population and growing workforce participation of both men and women in Pakistan will significantly boost domestic savings and investment. Increased foreign direct investment such as Chinese investment in China-Pakistan Economic Corridor over the next several decades will help fill the gap between the national savings rate and investments required to reach 7% annual GDP growth to create over 2 million jobs a year.

Security Issues:

Pakistan has paid a heavy price for its proximity to and involvement in "war on terror" in Afghanistan. It has cost Pakistan dearly in terms of loss of thousands of precious lives and lower investments due to investors' security concerns. Recent operations by Pakistan Army have helped turn the tide against terrorists, bringing more hope and greater confidence in Pakistan's future. Rising FDI in CPEC-related projects in the last couple of years are an indication of this confidence.

Future:

Pakistan is now experiencing the demographic dividend that Bangladesh has seen in the last few decades in terms of more of its population earning and fewer dependents. Pakistan's labor force is growing at 3.6% a year, much faster than its population growth rate of 2.34%. This should help boost Pakistan's per capita and its domestic savings rate.

At the same time, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) related projects are bringing more foreign direct investment, thereby speeding up the economic growth in the country. Pakistan's GDP growth is accelerating from less than 5% two years ago to 6% forecast for fiscal 2017-18. In its latest economic growth projections, Kennedy School's Center for International Development (CID) at Harvard University expects Pakistan's annual GDP growth to average 5.97% over the next 8 years, ranking it as the world's 6th fastest growing economy. It is within the realm of possibility that economic growth in Pakistan could exceed 7% in the next couple of years.

Summary:

Pakistan has fallen behind Bangladesh and India in per capita income as its growth rates have slipped in recent years mainly due to declining savings and investment rates and security issues. Demographic trends and improved security situation now favor Pakistan's future growth as its workforce grows and household sizes shrink.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kaka4u

Minister (2k+ posts)
jab apka sara textile sector waha chalay jaye ga to bharna he hay or apka kum ho gay or agar ap 5 se 10 sal in choro ko or do gay tu ... ap khud samjhdar hay
 

akmal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
راجہ صاحب سے رابطہ کریں
ان کے مطابق تو پاکستان کی معیشت اتنی تیزی سے ترقی کرنے والی ہے کہ پھڑی ای نئیں جانی
انکے پاس وافر مقدار میں سبز باغ موجود ہیں
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
یہ بات کی نا اکمل بھائی - دل خوش کر دیتا اے تسی
ان سبز باغوں میں سب کو سیر کرنے کی اجازت ہے - پر تسی ہی بار چکڑ وچ رینا پسند کردے او




راجہ صاحب سے رابطہ کریں
ان کے مطابق تو پاکستان کی معیشت اتنی تیزی سے ترقی کرنے والی ہے کہ پھڑی ای نئیں جانی
انکے پاس وافر مقدار میں سبز باغ موجود ہیں
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Main reason of Pakistan falling short was the shortage of power and Terrorism. Now it is being taken care off, Insha Allah we will regain our position.
 

arafay

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
A realistic analysis by Riaz Haq and one that I agree with.

First of all i think census numbers are on the lower side because only NIC holders were counted and millions of afghans, burmese, african, iranian and bengalis living in pakistan were not counted. We must also take into account the undocumented economy in pakistan that has been thriving under the punjabi dominant govt, judiciary and civil/military bureaucracy. The real size of economy is much larger than the official numbers estimate. Having said that bangladesh also has a large undocumented economy so they might still have a higher GDP per capita than pakistan.

The most revealing number however, is the savings rate which nobody talks about on TV or elsewhere. With such a poor savings rate it is hard to see how pakistani economy can be turned around in a sustainable manner. There is just not enough capital available in pakistan (at least in the banking sector) to keep the economy growing. Interest rates, inflation and terrorism has been lowest in decades yet Pakistani economy is barely crossing 5% GDP growth rate which proves that deomstic and foreign investors are not interested. Unless overseas pakistanis bring their capital back to pakistan, there is no way for Pakistan to sustain high GDP growth.

The hype around CPEC will soon fizzle out when chinese products start flooding pakistani market by road leading to collapse of local industry and causing mass unemployment. Also, since pakistani exporters failed to brand themselves, most foreign countries will prefer to buy chinese made goods from gwadar rather than pakistani made goods from karachi leading to collapse of export industry. Chinese companies can make everything that pakistani companies manufacturer cheaper, better and in much bigger quantity than pakistani counterparts can only dream of.

The reason why masses are not feeling the heat of the poor economic condition right now is because PMLN govt has subsidised imports using the borrowed foreign exchange reserves. Right now 1 USD = 105 PKR but actual worth of 1 USD = 120 PKR. By throwing foreign exchange in the market, govt is subsidizing importers/retailers and taxing exporters. As a result exports have dropped by 20% and imports have increased despite oil price crash. Eventually however, govt will run out of forex reserves and will no longer be able to maintain the exchange rate at 105. When that happens, the value of PKR will quickly depreciate by 15-20% and thus prices of all imported items will increase by 15-20% within a very short time.
 

arafay

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Main reason of Pakistan falling short was the shortage of power and Terrorism. Now it is being taken care off, Insha Allah we will regain our position.

Main problem with pakistan is punjab. If we remove punjab from the equation, sindh will grow by at least 10% GDP growth rate, KP 7-8% and even Balochistan with its limited industry and agriculture could still achieve 5% growth rate. Without the smaller provinces punjab would do well to hit 3% GDP growth rate.

Punjab drains all other provinces of water, power, gas and without matching the other provinces in terms output/productivity. for eg. Sindh's crop yield in cotton, wheat and sugarcane are all much higher (more than 100% for some crops) than punjab's per acre yield despite of the fact that on average punjabi grower is better educated and technologically advanced than sindhi grower. Similarly, Sindh's industry contributes more taxes and duties to FBR than all of the industry in Punjab.

In other words, if all the resources given to punjab (like water, gas, tax breaks) were given to sindh instead, pakistan would register a much higher GDP growth rate because Sindhi grower would produce more crop and sindhi industrialist would produce more revenue.
 

Okara

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Bangladeshi people must thank to Pakistan Army and Great Bhutto who forced them to part their way with us. We are ruled by people who are using Alhamdullilah very frequently to hide their corruption and same are their followers.
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
It is too late for me at this time to look into, but I can see you have very interesting points. I will for sure look into details tomorrow.
I hope and wish no one takes your comments as offending because they sound like ethnic divide. But I know what you are saying. At least I will try to find out what Punjab contributes in return of consuming such resources.

Main problem with pakistan is punjab. If we remove punjab from the equation, sindh will grow by at least 10% GDP growth rate, KP 7-8% and even Balochistan with its limited industry and agriculture could still achieve 5% growth rate. Without the smaller provinces punjab would do well to hit 3% GDP growth rate.

Punjab drains all other provinces of water, power, gas and without matching the other provinces in terms output/productivity. for eg. Sindh's crop yield in cotton, wheat and sugarcane are all much higher (more than 100% for some crops) than punjab's per acre yield despite of the fact that on average punjabi grower is better educated and technologically advanced than sindhi grower. Similarly, Sindh's industry contributes more taxes and duties to FBR than all of the industry in Punjab.

In other words, if all the resources given to punjab (like water, gas, tax breaks) were given to sindh instead, pakistan would register a much higher GDP growth rate because Sindhi grower would produce more crop and sindhi industrialist would produce more revenue.
 

akmal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
یہ بات کی نا اکمل بھائی - دل خوش کر دیتا اے تسی
ان سبز باغوں میں سب کو سیر کرنے کی اجازت ہے - پر تسی ہی بار چکڑ وچ رینا پسند کردے او



جھوٹے سبز باغوں سے حقیقت کا کیچڑ ہی اچھا
کم از کم بندہ صاف تو کرنے کی کوشش کرے گا
آپ نے تو کیچڑ کو ہی جنت بنا رکھا ہے
 

akmal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Main reason of Pakistan falling short was the shortage of power and Terrorism. Now it is being taken care off, Insha Allah we will regain our position.

 

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
Higher inequality does increase domestic savings in both Bangladesh and India. The super rich tend to save a lot more while the relatively poor end up spending most of their income to meet their needs.

And Bangladeshi economy is heavily dependent on textiles for growth, a sector that was started under the military regime.

However, BD still has the bigger investable savings pool to diversify their industrial base in the future.

If BD fails to diversify, their growth will slow as the Harvard Kennedy School projects that Bangladesh growth will slow to 2.82% average over the next 10 years, much lower than Pakistan's 5.97%.

http://www.riazhaq.com/2017/07/harvard-kennedy-school-cid-projects.html
 

RiazHaq

Senator (1k+ posts)
"In terms of LSM growth, a number of sectors that are showing strong performance; (for example, fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector; plastic products; buses and trucks; and even textiles), are either under reported, or not even covered. The omission of such important sectors from official data coverage, probably explains the apparent disconnect between overall economic activity in the country and the hard numbers in LSM." State Bank of Pakistan Annual Report 2014Economists have long argued that Pakistan's official GDP figures significantly understate real economic activity in terms of both production and consumption.



M. Ali Kemal and Ahmed Waqar Qasim, economists at Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), explored several published different approaches forsizing Pakistan's underground economyand settled on a combination of PSLM (Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement) consumption data and mis-invoicing of exports and imports to conclude that the country's "informal economy was 91% of the formal economy in 2007-08".

And now the State Bank of Pakistan has focused on the production side of the economy in its annual report for Fiscal Year 2014. The nation's central bankers have singled out the economic activity in large scale manufacturing sector as their focus in the latest report. They say that the existing LSM (Large Scale Manufacturing) index was based on Census of Manufacturing Industries (CMI) that was conducted in 2006 which included only those sectors which had significant value addition to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at the time of census.

In the years since 2006 CMI (Census of Manufacturing Industries) census, Pakistan has seen a significant expansion of its middle class along with rapidly growing consumer demand in sectors such as processed foodsand fast-moving-consumer goods (FMCG). It's one of several major new sectors whose growth is not reflected in the official GDP figures.



Pakistan's Processed Foods and FMCG Sector Source: BMA Capital


According to a report by analysts at Pakistan's Topline Securities that examined 25 consumer firms in various sectors, the 2012 sales of the FMCG firms increased by 17% to Rs. 334 billion while profits grew by 40% to Rs. 24 billion. In the five years between 2008 and 2012, sales of these companies showed a compounded average growth rate (CAGR) of 18%, while profits grew at a CAGR of 20%.


Engro Foods, a star performer in the sector, reported 191% increase in profit in 2012 alone, led by the dairy and beverages segment. Other players such as Nestle, Proctor & Gamble and Unilever, have also seen explosive growth with many new plants in production to meet demand. The growth in this sector is not reflected in the LSM component of GDP.

Another key area in large-scale manufacturing is plastics industry. Pakistan Plastic Manufacturing Association says there are 6,000 units operating in the country, employing 600,000 people. This sector is producing a broad range of products from household items, industrial containers, medical and surgical items, auto parts, stationery items and PVC pipes. Yet they are not covered in LSM.

The SBP report further explained that the LSM data was not being reported in Pakistan in accordance with the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC) of United Nations Statistics Division’s defined 22 broad categories of manufacturing. The reporting of LSM is limited to only 15 sectors identified by the ISIC while data pertaining to manufactures of apparels, publishing, printing products and recorded media, fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), office and accounting machinery and computers, medical precision and optical instruments and recycling of metal and non-metal waste scrap, is not included as part of Pakistan’s LSM.

Pakistan has changed a lot since 2006 in terms of economy and demographics. The World Bank moved Pakistan from a low-income to middle-income country in 2007. Pakistan is much more urbanized and more middle classnow than it was in 2006. Pakistan's large scale manufacturing (LSM) sector has changed to respond to meet the rising new product demands of the country's growing middle class consumers. Its time for Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) to conduct a new manufacturing census and Pakistan Census Bureau to do a population census to paint a more accurate picture of the country's demographics and economy now.

http://www.riazhaq.com/2015/01/state-bank-pakistans-actual-gdp-higher.html
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
چلو یار جتھے رو خوش رو


200.webp



جھوٹے سبز باغوں سے حقیقت کا کیچڑ ہی اچھا
کم از کم بندہ صاف تو کرنے کی کوشش کرے گا
آپ نے تو کیچڑ کو ہی جنت بنا رکھا ہے
 

RajaRawal111

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Your post is very rich with information. I am not sure where to confirm these figures. It appears as coming from a research thesis.
For punjab Do you want to say it will be better if Punjab is divided into smaller provinces. Personally I am also fan of this idea of breaking the provinces into further units.
However one thing i am really confused with is that how Punjab will be better off if it disassociates itself (of course economical) from other provinces.

Main problem with pakistan is punjab. If we remove punjab from the equation, sindh will grow by at least 10% GDP growth rate, KP 7-8% and even Balochistan with its limited industry and agriculture could still achieve 5% growth rate. Without the smaller provinces punjab would do well to hit 3% GDP growth rate.

Punjab drains all other provinces of water, power, gas and without matching the other provinces in terms output/productivity. for eg. Sindh's crop yield in cotton, wheat and sugarcane are all much higher (more than 100% for some crops) than punjab's per acre yield despite of the fact that on average punjabi grower is better educated and technologically advanced than sindhi grower. Similarly, Sindh's industry contributes more taxes and duties to FBR than all of the industry in Punjab.

In other words, if all the resources given to punjab (like water, gas, tax breaks) were given to sindh instead, pakistan would register a much higher GDP growth rate because Sindhi grower would produce more crop and sindhi industrialist would produce more revenue.
 

arafay

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Your post is very rich with information. I am not sure where to confirm these figures. It appears as coming from a research thesis.
For punjab Do you want to say it will be better if Punjab is divided into smaller provinces. Personally I am also fan of this idea of breaking the provinces into further units.
However one thing i am really confused with is that how Punjab will be better off if it disassociates itself (of course economical) from other provinces.

These statistics are rarely discussed in media because it will expose so called good governance in punjab. However, you will find some stats here and there.

for eg. WHEAT

"The average per acre hectare wheat yield of Sindh in the last three years is more than 3,400 tons as against about 2,600 tons for Punjab."

https://www.dawn.com/news/961207

This despite

a) Sindh is getting irrigation water share on the basis of historical usage rather than a consensus formula agreed ion 1991. It gets a much reduced share of water. In Punjab, the water availability is higher than the indicated share and is also supplemented by under-ground water reservoir which is never included in total pool of water availability of the country.

b) Bank credit to Sindh farmers is also scarce as compared to agricultural loans being given to farmers in Punjab.

According to a report of State Bank of Pakistan, the volume of agricultural credit in the last six years, from 2001 to 2007, increased by 259 per cent from Rs58.9 billion to Rs211 billion. Punjab's share increased from 75.3 per cent to 83.4 per cent, but that of Sindh declined from 17.6 per cent to 11.7 per cent.


COTTON

"Sindh achieved yields of more than 1,000 kilograms per hectare between 2011 and 2014 as compared to Punjab’s 700kg to 750kg during the period, he said, quoting figures of the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. In 2011-12, per-hectare yield in Sindh touched 1,546kg, more than double as compared to Punjab’s."

http://par.com.pk/news/pests-threaten-sindhs-bt-cotton-production

SUGAR CANE

He said that average sugarcane production in Punjab is about 639 mound per acre which is far bellow the international average standard of 710 mounds per acre.

https://timesofislamabad.com/sugarc...-steps-to-increase-per-acre-yield/2016/08/22/

Given that agriculture in pakistan has no income tax and is heavily subsidised by the govt in terms of fertiliser import, machinery import and even agri loans, these statistics are nothing short of embarrassing.
 

Back
Top