Sir, I respect your opinion but completely disagree with the conclusion that you have made. My last post, you responded with videos of Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz who rejected Hadith. He had a few followers and you are one of them.
Rather than getting into a debate, I pray to Allah that He gives you strength and wisdom to study the Deen so you believe in the correct message that was brought by Muhammad SAW.
azeezam kzuhair sb, you have every right to disagree with me I too respect your right to disagree with me. Please be rest assured I have nothing personal against you. All I am doing is drawing yours and others attention to what is not right in my view for attribution to the quran and deen of islam.
Ghulam ahmed parwez did not reject hadis but he accepted only those ahadees which he thought were according to the quran according his understanding of the quran and deen of islam. This is what all mullas do as well including the mufti sb. Ahadees books are works of people not God and ahadees books contain many false reports. Not only that but also many ahadees reports appear to be false because they have been mistranslated or misinterpreted by mullas which show the quran, deen of islam and the messengers of God in bad light.
As for your point that parwez marhoom had a few followers, yes he did and the reason is not because he was necessarily wrong but because he was an educated man whom only educated people supported and they still do. But that does not mean he did not make mistakes, for he did. What he did good was, he tried to remove some very wrong concepts about God , his messengers, the quran and deen of islam due to which nonmuslims of his time raised plenty of objections against God, the quran, deen of islam and the final messenger of God. What you and your mullaans are doing is discrediting the man altogether instead of pointing out his mistakes and correcting them.
Most people in the world are illiterate even today never mind 1500 years back in time. Yet more people lack proper education and training so they cannot think for themselves. Not only that there are more people who are nonmuslim than those who claim to be muslims. So no wonder educated people in the world are far and in between so if less people follow an idea it is only because the rest have not bothered to reach their stage or level of thinking. The day they do they too will say and do the same as a few educated people say and do. Truth about an idea is not deciding on basis of majority and minority but on basis of solid rules of judgement.
I do not follow anyone, not even the final messenger of God let alone parwez sb instead I support the mission with which final messenger of Allah was sent because that is what the quran requires of us human beings. The idea of people following people is result of misinterpretations of the quranic text. Words ITAAT and ITBAA do not mean obeying and following in the context of the quran. They mean mental consistency and physical support.
When the quran tells us for ITAAT of Allah, His messenger and of a person from among ourselves whom we select as a porper human community to manage affairs of ummah it means we all need to be on the same page mentally and must work towards the very same end physically so that the mission Allah assigned to us human beings is fulfilled.
All people who accept mission of Allah and support it to carry it through are party of Allah or supporters of mission of Allah not slaves and masters of each other. All opponents of Allah's assigned mission are called party of shaitan.
The questions are why mullas mistranslated and misinterpreted the quran? When did they do it? How did they do it? Why deen of islam became mazhab of islam? When did this happen? How did it happen? What part did rulers, money lenders, mullas, their touts and supporters played? Why ummah is in current situation? Who is responsible for this state of ummah? How can this state of ummah be changed for the best possible? And this chain of questions carries on and on.
Deen if isalm is all about human brotherhood under rule of law of God as revealed to his final messenger in form of the quran. Anyone who accepts any other ruler than Allah becomes a mushrik according to the quran.
Deen of islam is all about bringing about a proper human community in the kingdom of God called the universe. Where did the concept of money based business dealing come from in deen of islam which is based upon foundation of profit and loss when deen of islam strictly forbids people from inflicting loss upon each other?
Deen of islam is supposed to be understood by all people from the quran and there is no concept of mullaiyat in the quran so where does that come from into this ummah? Who created mullaism and for what reason or how?
As for you praying for hidayat of people that is nothing more than a good wish, however, it is time to start working on things I have pointed out because that is what all the messengers of God did ie they wroked hard for making their God given missions a success. Mere praying to God does not produce results unless the related work is also carried out for which one is praying. When we will think in a critical way we will come to realise what actual deen of islam or what real message of the quran is and I am hopeful all people like your good self will do that.
May God bless all of us with proper understanding of his message and help us succeed is fulfilling his assigned mission.
regards and all the best.
