forum4email
Councller (250+ posts)
بہت زبردست شاٹ کھیلی ہے عمران خان نے ۔۔۔۔
Great answer by Imran Khan to Ahsan Iqbal
tauseef-it
MPA (400+ posts)
Ha Ha Ha,
Imran Bhai Halka Hath Rakehin
Bacha Dr Jaye Ga,
Imran Bhai Zindabad
Imran Bhai Halka Hath Rakehin
Bacha Dr Jaye Ga,
Imran Bhai Zindabad
atifsharif
MPA (400+ posts)
aap ka jawab dene ka andaz pasand aya .... thanks for being good . normally tehreeki get emotional when they are not able to answer .. anyways ..
brother aap ne kaha ke nawaz sharif expiment kar raha tha .. no that is not correct nawaz sharif served as a finance minster then as a cheif minister of punjab and then prime minister of pakistan ... so as a prime minister he was not new aur koi tajruba nahi kar raha tha .. secondly .. aap ne misal di .. turkey ke president ki ... aap is ka profile par lain zara aap ko pata chal jaye ga us ke steps ka ... phir aap ne baat ki mahatir muhamed .. .. .nawaz sharif aur mahatir ko mila rahe hain .. mahatir ruled 22 yrs continously .. and nawaz sharif 2 yrs and then again 2 yrs ... ... aap ki information ke liye mahatir aur abdullah gul dono ke profile ka link paste karta hoon .. read it is interesting ..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahathir_Mohamad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Gül
brother aap ne kaha ke nawaz sharif expiment kar raha tha .. no that is not correct nawaz sharif served as a finance minster then as a cheif minister of punjab and then prime minister of pakistan ... so as a prime minister he was not new aur koi tajruba nahi kar raha tha .. secondly .. aap ne misal di .. turkey ke president ki ... aap is ka profile par lain zara aap ko pata chal jaye ga us ke steps ka ... phir aap ne baat ki mahatir muhamed .. .. .nawaz sharif aur mahatir ko mila rahe hain .. mahatir ruled 22 yrs continously .. and nawaz sharif 2 yrs and then again 2 yrs ... ... aap ki information ke liye mahatir aur abdullah gul dono ke profile ka link paste karta hoon .. read it is interesting ..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahathir_Mohamad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Gül
ShakeelAhmed
Councller (250+ posts)
Ghanjooo ko aisa hi jawab dayna chaiye takay gaaaanjaaay aur ggghhaannjjaaay ho jae jal jal k
Ok. But I am saying your logic is wrong. So was Nawas Sharif learning at the expense of finance ministry?
The the logic is wrong. Ehsan Iqbal is comparing political posts with technical stuff, which shows he does not understand the basic concept of democracy and political system.
Which ministry Quaid-e-Azam held before he became leader of Pakistan movement?
What ministry Mao held before he became the leader of China after revolution?
These people attained such status on the basis of their credibility and exceptional talent.
Imran Khan has shown such talent. He has shown honesty and credibility.
Mahateer joined an existing party and climbed the ladder, some people create their own parties and bring change. The Turkish ruling party - the argument still holds - came into power for the first time and changed Turkey's destiny. Why can't PTI do that?
PTI also has an experience. 15 years of political experience. Imran has served in national assembly as an elected candidate. PTI has had many offers of power, but it showed principles.
So, the ground work is prepared. PTI has all the qualities to lead Pakistan to glory as any new party should possess.
While as I said, Nawas Sharif is tried and tested, but failed.
Destiny gives you few chances. Nawas Sharif had two, yet he failed to deliver.
And please, don't say he was not allowed to. You create your own space with your moral authority.
Mahateer Muhammad was not ousted after two years because he was delivering.
Turkish government was not ousted, even though Turkey had a constitutional role of the army, unlike Pakistan, because Turkish government delivered and attained the acceptability of the public.
When Musharraf ousted Nawas Sharif government, hardly any common Pakistani felt uncomfortable. IN fact, many Pakistanis uttered a sigh of relief.
If so-called leaders leave such legacies, then they themselves are to be blamed for their failures, not anyone else.
The the logic is wrong. Ehsan Iqbal is comparing political posts with technical stuff, which shows he does not understand the basic concept of democracy and political system.
Which ministry Quaid-e-Azam held before he became leader of Pakistan movement?
What ministry Mao held before he became the leader of China after revolution?
These people attained such status on the basis of their credibility and exceptional talent.
Imran Khan has shown such talent. He has shown honesty and credibility.
Mahateer joined an existing party and climbed the ladder, some people create their own parties and bring change. The Turkish ruling party - the argument still holds - came into power for the first time and changed Turkey's destiny. Why can't PTI do that?
PTI also has an experience. 15 years of political experience. Imran has served in national assembly as an elected candidate. PTI has had many offers of power, but it showed principles.
So, the ground work is prepared. PTI has all the qualities to lead Pakistan to glory as any new party should possess.
While as I said, Nawas Sharif is tried and tested, but failed.
Destiny gives you few chances. Nawas Sharif had two, yet he failed to deliver.
And please, don't say he was not allowed to. You create your own space with your moral authority.
Mahateer Muhammad was not ousted after two years because he was delivering.
Turkish government was not ousted, even though Turkey had a constitutional role of the army, unlike Pakistan, because Turkish government delivered and attained the acceptability of the public.
When Musharraf ousted Nawas Sharif government, hardly any common Pakistani felt uncomfortable. IN fact, many Pakistanis uttered a sigh of relief.
If so-called leaders leave such legacies, then they themselves are to be blamed for their failures, not anyone else.
Great answer by Imran Khan to people of pakistan to get them understand whats going on in pakistan politics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQyIRT76d5E&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQyIRT76d5E&feature=player_embedded
shaheer
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: Great answer by Imran Khan to people of pakistan to get them understand whats going on in pakistan politics
yeh ahsan iqbal educated ha lakin phir bhi apnay aap ko "parha likha" sabat karnay ki koshish karta rahta ha.ek he baat pakri hui ha k purana ddaaakterrrr theek ha.stupid logic.
yeh ahsan iqbal educated ha lakin phir bhi apnay aap ko "parha likha" sabat karnay ki koshish karta rahta ha.ek he baat pakri hui ha k purana ddaaakterrrr theek ha.stupid logic.
Analytical
Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Imran said truth
ShakeelAhmed
Councller (250+ posts)
imran khan hai bas aik thek
