every day they have to clarifies some bongi
i m just enjoying here how people like u supporting every boongi's of khan it's just fun for me baki rahi bail extension usko jail m hi rehne do acha hoga pehle ap apni bat bataen k konsi apni bat pr kaim haiBail Extention ki Request per kaam karo rather than wasting time here.
why can't he represent himself as law minister in the court?
this justification makes no sense...
I think he as the one who created the indemnity bond clause which made the courts look bad. Also the deal between army and sharifs almost got cancelled as a result. Now it seems establishment+judiciary have taken him down and signaled to IK govt who is boss.
Koi muscle nhi sb drama hy adlua ka waqar bhal krny k liey aik hvaey fire he.CJ Koosa is showing his muscles, This wasn't a public interest issue... Qanooni Moshagafian
Joota parh chuka hey- ab chahey sariy kabina istifa dey dey- yeh phurtiyan pehley dikhani theeyn
There was lacuna in the rules and regulations which was pointed out by the court. That lacuna is now removed by the cabinet. End of the story.every day they have to clarifies some bongi
No he can't represent himself as law minister: That's the duty of AG.why can't he represent himself as law minister in the court?
this justification makes no sense...
No he can't represent himself as law minister: That's the duty of AG.
While he is member of cabinet, he cannot represent a client as well.
If you don't like that - bad luck but stop making gongloo comments.
AG can represent only the Federal government --- and not the Army Chief (whose representation is called by the court). AG (or federal government) cannot represent Army chief in this case. Even when Army as an institution is called in the court - AG can't appear on its behalf. This representation is not about institution but about a person, in any case.OK, then why does he have to resign if AG can represent him?
and which client is he going to represent? he does not even have an active bar license
AG can represent only the Federal government --- and not the Army Chief (whose representation is called by the court). AG (or federal government) cannot represent Army chief in this case. Even when Army as an institution is called in the court - AG can't appear on its behalf. This representation is not about institution but about a person, in any case.
He resigned as he was the one who had initiated and proceeded the summary about extension and as a lawyer he is in the best position to represent the case of Army Chief.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|