@Samy99
and
@ zeeshaancheeta
Thanks to the above posts of two brothers/sisters whatever.
Energy crisis, trust deficit in the present government, ruthless borrowing, corruption, useless spending on the government machinary such as a huge number of ministers, present government's everyday tactics to bring new issues to divert attention, delibrate attempts to weaken the institutions e.g confrontation with the Supreme Court, law and order situation and dictations from America are the main issues which are not letting the country being run in an active way.
In Musharraf regime a big cushin was the ongoing American interest and a huge inflow of Dollars in our economy. There was no energy crisis. America did not think of going back from Afghanistan but to win the invasion at all costs.
At this point of time the show of invasion by the only world power is nearly over, they have nearly been defeated and they have no interest in fresh spending in Afghanistan or Pakistan.
Now they are thinking of how to get back safely and honourably.
The constitution of Pakistan does not provide for a technocat government.
It will only contribute towards bringing new faces who will not be responsible to the people of Pakistan.
One thing should be remembered that in the current scenario either there are no laws which can hold accountable the corrupt politicians or there are flexible laws which can easily be manupolated by the rogue elements in politics and elsewhere to protect their unlawful attitude.
we have already seen the devastating results of a technocrat government in Musharraf regime i.e. of Shaukat Aziz.
The results will be the worst again if there is no parliament there.
The only constitutional way is to seek fresh mendate from the people of Pakistan.
The main reason is: mandate given in February, 2008 elections has completely vanished as a result of the people party's typical attitude towards politics in Pakistan and there is a complete vacuum.
There is no harm in going back to the people of Pakistan for their fresh view of affairs in Pakistan as they must be the real rulers of the country.
The only harm is to those politicians who feel they have not performed well or have the threat of not being elected again.
If that is the case, self-interests of certain politicians could be sacrificed against the national interest as there is no concept of serving and protecting the self-interests of the politicians or individuals as against the national interests.
Slogan of technocat government can only be given by those (for example Imran Khan, PML(Q), Sheikh Rasheed or siasi yateems etc etc) who have no confidence in the public mandate or are disappointed of being elected to form a democratic and constitutional government.
If Imran Khan is showing himself to be a technocrat it is incorrect.
A balanced approach can be he is not a technocrat.
He is asking for moon to play with.
It can only be a routine attempt as by other politicians to misguide and misdirect the readers to call him a technocat.
Economic chaos is the gigantic problem facing the country.
One can accept Shaukat Aziz was a technocrat with a particular experience in financial management. Many others having long experience and a sound background in law, education etc can be referred to as professionals in their respective fields experties.
It is not possible that a cricket captian controlling his eleven member team can be treated a technocrat or he should self-proclaim to be a technocrat.
Running of a government in a big country like Pakistan is not a show of cricket team.It will just be an over-estimation by him to claim that he is a technocrat.
Our dilema is that while governing, we obstruct the public interests of being realised and prefer nepotism and coronism.
If we go to the people for fresh mandate again and again to resolve the bottle-necks in governing the country, one day we will be on a right track.
A mid-term election for going back to the people of Pakistan to refresh their mandate is the only and the best solution in the national interest to get out of the current quigmire.