And MS is dying.... Heard it all in 2000 and 2008 when everyone started to worship CrApple. Factories churning out iPhones have meshes around their windows to prevent suicide. In a true capitalistic sense, MS doesn't even come close to apple, google and fb let alone Nestlé when it comes to evil. MS just got too big for them and paid the price for it. It baffles my mind EU and US forced MS to decouple IE from their OS core but you can't fully use your droid or iPhone without a google/apple account. Abd that's okay.Mark my words, time will tell Bill Gates is another scamer. Microsoft has massive budget to maintain monopoly and buy to kill any potential competitor globally same as Nestlé.
Google is the worst - started with "Do no evil" and ended up with "Never do good".And MS is dying.... Heard it all in 2000 and 2008 when everyone started to worship CrApple. Factories churning out iPhones have meshes around their windows to prevent suicide. In a true capitalistic sense, MS doesn't even come close to apple, google and fb let alone Nestlé when it comes to evil. MS just got too big for them and paid the price for it. It baffles my mind EU and US forced MS to decouple IE from their OS core but you can't fully use your droid or iPhone without a google/apple account. Abd that's okay.
Old Bill will be right again.
Ps all the little gimmicks of apple and google are them hunting down small firms and merging them thus owning all their IP and innovations... But I digress....
And MS is dying.... Heard it all in 2000 and 2008 when everyone started to worship CrApple. Factories churning out iPhones have meshes around their windows to prevent suicide. In a true capitalistic sense, MS doesn't even come close to apple, google and fb let alone Nestlé when it comes to evil. MS just got too big for them and paid the price for it. It baffles my mind EU and US forced MS to decouple IE from their OS core but you can't fully use your droid or iPhone without a google/apple account. Abd that's okay.
Old Bill will be right again.
Ps all the little gimmicks of apple and google are them hunting down small firms and merging them thus owning all their IP and innovations... But I digress....
It baffles my mind EU and US forced MS to decouple IE from their OS core but you can't fully use your droid or iPhone without a google/apple account. Abd that's okay.
Not true in MS case, there are alternatives, Linux and it's various distros for starters. Love them or hate them but MS and Intel have single highhandedly made computers a household thing. How many in Pak or Africa would have been able to afford an overpriced and underperformic Mac?C virus is reality not fictions..BG..Nestle.. corporate world monopoly is also big reality..I always asking..there should be alternatives in the world for MS.I phone..Andriod.. Google..FB..etc.. Only China can create alternatives against these corporate world monopoly.. Russia only compete via military industry..
LINUX is a very powerful and stable system provided you have the technical knowledge to leverage it's features. Just a steeper learning curve for the average user. I tend to agree with you otherwise.Google is the worst - started with "Do no evil" and ended up with "Never do good".
FB/apple is next on evil practices.
With all good and bad of bill gate, Microsoft has done the most good in its respective market through the globe, and is here to stay for some time. Linux or Android, may sound good on ideology but are flawed OS.
They also demanded ms shared IE code and make it open source hence the w3c debacle. So does Google force you and apple too as much as MS did with the memory hogs known as safari and chrome. They both lag in Acid tests. Curated package? Nope, Intel AMD hardware locked by code selling you obsolete hardware at tripple the premium soldering most components so you cant even swap/upgrade off the shelf till at least the last generation and nAgree with overall sentiment except above.
Apple at least is a "packaged" product that comes bundled with hardware/software.
MS on the other hand is forcing other companies to use IE (totally rubbish browser) with their product.
I didn't meant "flawed" in terms of technical capabilities - in a constantly progressing technological world there will always be one solution ahead of the other,LINUX is a very powerful and stable system provided you have the technical knowledge to leverage it's features. Just a steeper learning curve for the average user. I tend to agree with you otherwise.
I didn't meant "flawed" in terms of technical capabilities - in a constantly progressing technological world there will always be one solution ahead of the other,
Flaws are in terms of scale, usability, portability and standardization and of course training (starting from high schools). Open is progressive, but that is its inherent flaw.
Around 2000 there was big push to go for linux in academia and research institutions, or previous fetish with mac in math related academia, but how far it did go. Still those who had switched are users of MS as well- that has rather added to work-hours overall,. When all considered MS is cost-effective. There is no inherent shortcoming in MS except, of course, propriety issues but that have not hindered progress much in the past, rather standardization has resulted in reduced costs for developers.
They also demanded ms shared IE code and make it open source hence the w3c debacle. So does Google force you and apple too as much as MS did with the memory hogs known as safari and chrome. They both lag in Acid tests. Curated package? Nope, Intel AMD hardware locked by code selling you obsolete hardware at tripple the premium soldering most components so you cant even swap/upgrade off the shelf till at least the last generation and n
ow it's too late for them.
The premium you pay for that product renders it as cost effective as a luxury phone.
So you're telling me googles plus,hangouts were better than fb and or apples maps are any match for gmaps? It's not really as well curated as you'd think
Point is totally different.
MS is essentially using it's market clout to force PC makers to use their browser. This is also true for Chrome as well.
At least in the US, you have to jump the same number of hoops for both PC and apple in order to use some other browser.
Define forcing.... I don't recall MS touting IE as a must be default gateway, not in the last 20 years at least. And they have ever right to package their os with it and advertise it as Apple or google has to advertise their services half of which nobody uses. You made Crapple look like the perfect package which it isn't and IE like just a browser war which it wasn't. When that happened, the only competition was netscape navigator. It's the exact same thing, fear of monopoly only in this case Apple and Google are allowed to do as they please. Don't know about Crapple but MS has a pretty streamlined process of switching default browsers. Of course some components are always loaded but that's because win uses IE Core as part of the update process.
I touched on a number of things not just one.
Apple is good at the dumb stuff, running photoshop, itunes etc and at best mixing sound.... anything else is beyond Apple overpriced macs. Not ideal for computationally expensive processes ie production. Locking hardware and charging a premium, when the cons outweigh the pros. You don't call it a well packaged device, not even a decent one. A well package machine is scalable, not locked.
Save for some geeks, apple is considered to be quite elegant and "dummy" proof for majority of consumers with little to no fear of getting hacked or infected with innumerable viruses.
Main reason for coming so hard on MS was probably it's penetration (almost to a level of monopoly) in the retail/business market.
Again, don't see much difference in the level of difficulty or ease in switching to some other browser in either of the two platforms.
Lol people with fingerprint locks on their phones are worried about privacy and identities.
Not true in MS case, there are alternatives, Linux and it's various distros for starters. Love them or hate them but MS and Intel have single highhandedly made computers a household thing. How many in Pak or Africa would have been able to afford an overpriced and underperformic Mac?
China has still a lot to catch up on, especially in hardware sector. I mean yeah, it's easy to stamp clones but just to give you an example, let's take the highly trumped up huawei processor (Soc), Kirin, underneath all that chinese innovative silicon lies a set of basic chips, architectures and cores purchased and licensed from ARM running their cores. China still has a lot to catch up on.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|