I was so disgusted, horrified, astonished and disappointed watching three senior politicians of three parties on 'Sawal Yeh ha' discussing Pakistan's current affairs. Believe you me; I got the impression that it was not a political debate but a dog fight between three men who were out there to tear each other apart. All of them spoke at the same time without letting the other present his views and were often joined by the incompetent anchor man, Dr Danish, who joined in as usual at top of his voice and made it a foursome dog fight.
I was thinking watching this programme, it should be watched globally and what kind of impression our politicians would give to the world that they are unable to discuss anything in a civilized way.
Why these anchor men and women can not control the participants and tell them to behave, speak politely, listen to the others point of view and wait for their turns to answer? Dr Danish is loud mouthed anchor man who does not know how to conduct an interview or a debate and should be coached in this skill. Why can not these anchor men and women question Pakistani politicians about economic matters of the country and discuss monetary policy of their parties by presenting facts and figures on the table to back up their argument instead of indulging in a dog's fight speaking about the irrelevance of their dead and living corrupt and dishonest leaders?
I was thinking watching this programme, it should be watched globally and what kind of impression our politicians would give to the world that they are unable to discuss anything in a civilized way.
Why these anchor men and women can not control the participants and tell them to behave, speak politely, listen to the others point of view and wait for their turns to answer? Dr Danish is loud mouthed anchor man who does not know how to conduct an interview or a debate and should be coached in this skill. Why can not these anchor men and women question Pakistani politicians about economic matters of the country and discuss monetary policy of their parties by presenting facts and figures on the table to back up their argument instead of indulging in a dog's fight speaking about the irrelevance of their dead and living corrupt and dishonest leaders?