Approval of emergency by Parliament regrettable act: CJP

[commander]

Approval of emergency by Parliament regrettable act: CJP

http://www.geo.tv/7-29-2009/46739.htm

Updated at: 2155 PST, Wednesday, July 29, 2009
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Wednesday said the judiciary is often blamed but the regrettable aspect of the case is that the parliament passed resolution, approving imposition of emergency.

The CJP said this in his remarks while hearing the constitution petition regarding appointment of high court judges and PCO judges.

Attorney General Latif Khosa said that Pakistan Peoples Party was not the part of that resolution.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry also said no such precedence exists in the world where martial law had been imposed with an aim to target judiciary. General Cromwells body was exhumed and hanged in country like Britain, he pointed out.

He said other cases are suffering delays because of the ongoing hearing of petition on judges appointment, as the entire nation awaits the courts judgment.

The CJP said the role of judiciary was being appreciated until September 6, 2007 and it was being said the Supreme Court served the country and nation by allowing Pervez Musharraf to contest the presidential election.

He discussed with Advocate Hamid Ali Khan as to what happened during October 22, 2007 and November 2, 2007 that necessitated an extreme decision of declaring emergency in the country.

At one point Justice Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday said in his remarks that baseless observations were made for maligning the judges during Tikka Iqbal case.

Earlier, Hamid Khan in his arguments said the verdict on Tikka Iqbal case was based on the observation that the countrys defence was in jeopardy but nothing was explained as to what threats the countrys defence was facing at that time.

He said 5 more judges were appointed between November 23, 2007 and February 15, 2009 only to show that the decision was made by a 13-member bench.

 

[PakPatriot1]

How come this CJP Mr. Iftikhar Choudhary said so? He himself took oath on PCO under the order of Musharaf - a dictator. This act of CJ and other judges endorsed the legitimacy of dictatorship.
Can some oneone on this forum explain to me why he did so?

 

[abbasiali]

How come this CJP Mr. Iftikhar Choudhary said so? He himself took oath on PCO under the order of Musharaf - a dictator. This act of CJ and other judges endorsed the legitimacy of dictatorship.
Can some oneone on this forum explain to me why he did so?

Dear Paki,
Nice to hear from you,
Let me emphasis in this way, first we have to have a policy of APPRECIATION, regardless of who is who, correct? (Just be clear with your self, do you need Democracy or Dictatorship)

Time for us, we need someone to take initiate, and this is what happening here.

Its a matter fact, that history for CJP is not that much great, the way it should be, Now if I really would like to go for an argument, I can bring a lot of live examples, but, there is no point, because, we already have suffer, As you have said in your earlier reply, that, no one is perfect, so I am sure, now you will be clear, what exactly I mean. What CJP is stating is a need of current time.

Regards

 

[PakPatriot1]

How come this CJP Mr. Iftikhar Choudhary said so? He himself took oath on PCO under the order of Musharaf - a dictator. This act of CJ and other judges endorsed the legitimacy of dictatorship.
Can some oneone on this forum explain to me why he did so?

Dear Paki,
Nice to hear from you,
Let me emphasis in this way, first we have to have a policy of APPRECIATION, regardless of who is who, correct? (Just be clear with your self, do you need Democracy or Dictatorship)

Time for us, we need someone to take initiate, and this is what happening here.

Its a matter fact, that history for CJP is not that much great, the way it should be, Now if I really would like to go for an argument, I can bring a lot of live examples, but, there is no point, because, we already have suffer, As you have said in your earlier reply, that, no one is perfect, so I am sure, now you will be clear, what exactly I mean. What CJP is stating is a need of current time.

Regards

Abbasi Bhai:
Yes, I am agreed, no one is perfect, But that's for politicians. They have to face people anyways and they have to pay the penalty in every after four years.
But for the CJ of Supreme court of Pakistan, can we compromise?

 

[abbasiali]

How come this CJP Mr. Iftikhar Choudhary said so? He himself took oath on PCO under the order of Musharaf - a dictator. This act of CJ and other judges endorsed the legitimacy of dictatorship.
Can some oneone on this forum explain to me why he did so?

Dear Paki,
Nice to hear from you,
Let me emphasis in this way, first we have to have a policy of APPRECIATION, regardless of who is who, correct? (Just be clear with your self, do you need Democracy or Dictatorship)

Time for us, we need someone to take initiate, and this is what happening here.

Its a matter fact, that history for CJP is not that much great, the way it should be, Now if I really would like to go for an argument, I can bring a lot of live examples, but, there is no point, because, we already have suffer, As you have said in your earlier reply, that, no one is perfect, so I am sure, now you will be clear, what exactly I mean. What CJP is stating is a need of current time.

Regards

Abbasi Bhai:
Yes, I am agreed, no one is perfect, But that's for politicians. They have to face people anyways and they have to pay the penalty in every after four years.
But for the CJ of Supreme court of Pakistan, can we compromise?

Yes Why not,

If everybody is sucking our blood, and in all cases we are the only loosers, so why not give him a chance,

We give incentive to every bull shit, result is nil, so this time, try him, wait and see, i am not optimistic, everybody is looting us, so after having final result from him, everything will come in black and white.

So far he is pretending different from others, so lets see. don't be rigid, just because he is CJ.

Regards.

 

[Jury]

Why CJ hasn't expressed his regret about the using his position for his son to provide job?
Not one, two times.

 

[commander]

Is there any one in Pakistan who gets some position and do not try to do some thing for his family +relatives , neighbors, village walas and the list is long.

 

[abbasiali]

Why CJ hasn't expressed his regret about the using his position for his son to provide job?
Not one, two times.

Dear Jury,

He is definitely accountable for both acts, OATH as PCO judge in 99 and his son scandal. He should come out with at least an apology, But on the other side, things which he is attempting is actually going in my and your favor, this will impact on our children's future, so for him we have to give him a concession, as I earlier said, our blood had been sucked by every possible person, we are remain same poor, but these people have become rich and rich, what they did? they only exploit us and become successful, so be lenient with CJ and see how he will deliver,

Regards.

 

[abbasiali]

Is there any one in Pakistan who gets some position and do not try to do some thing for his family +relatives , neighbors, village walas and the list is long.

Correct

 

[Jury]

Is there any one in Pakistan who gets some position and do not try to do some thing for his family +relatives , neighbors, village walas and the list is long.

Clinton was not in hot water, because what he did with Monica Lewinsky.
Just because, as a president he lied of his act.
If CJ is not accountable for his wrong doings of using his position,
so, there is no morality of judging other for wrong doings.