32 Nuclear Power Plants to generate 40,000MW - PAEC

Admiral

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
PAEC: 32 nuclear plants to produce 40,000MW (انشااللہ )

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-3-235039-32-nuclear-plants-to-produce-40,000MW:-PAEC

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is in the process of selecting eight sites for the installation of 32 nuclear power plants, which will generate a total of 40,000 MW electricity, said Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) chairman Dr Ansar Parvez on Wednesday. He did not specify a time frame.


In an exclusive interview with The News, Parvez spoke of the need to change the energy mix and overcome the issue of circular debt. “Our future plans are to have nuclear power plants supply one-fourth of our total required capacity.”

“On the directives of the prime minister, we are selecting eight sites for installing more nuclear power plants. Each site will feature a total of four plants – having a capacity of producing 1,100 MW each – which will be built in two phases,” explained Parvez.

According to the PAEC chairman, China has agreed to finance 82 percent of the total cost for two Karachi Nuclear Power Plants (KANUPP-2 and KANUPP-3) and will be providing a loan of $6.5 billion for the same.

The deal is going through despite objections from the Nuclear Supplier Group – the international body that regulates nuclear power trade. China has rebuffed call from the body saying that its nuclear exchange with Pakistan predates the group’s charter and is thus exempt from it.

The remaining 18 percent of cost will be borne by Islamabad. “Since the government will be providing its share in rupees, it won’t need to arrange foreign exchange for the K-2 and K-3 plants,” he added.

According to Parvez, the government has also selected a site at Muzaffargarh for installing a 1,100 MW plant.

Despite a roiling energy crisis that has been building up over the last few years, Pakistan’s civil nuclear ambitions have always been stymied by the nexus of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the US government. Since Pakistan has not signed on to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the supply of uranium, the basic fuel for generating electricity, is subject to severe global restrictions, historically, Islamabad has had no option but to comply.

However, the intercession by the US to grant a civil nuclear cooperation deal to India in 2005 rankled Islamabad, which put in a similar request. This too, was shot down on the basis of fears regarding the security of the country’s nuclear assets at a time Islamabad is grappling with Islamic militancy. (While the US government has offered to help Pakistan meet its energy needs through hydel power and thermal projects, energy experts in Pakistan dismiss as these as an inadequate sop.)

However, no such worries are weighing down the PAEC chairman, who sounds remarkably optimistic about the future of these plants.

“There is no moral justification for depriving Islamabad of uranium at a time when many other countries, including India, are getting uranium from Australia,” says Parvez. “Since we cannot trust others for availability of basic fuel for running nuclear power plants, Pakistan has always inserted a clause in its agreement with China for ensuring lifetime fuel supply for nuclear power plants.”

According to Parvez, while ‘lifetime’ in the context of Chashma-1 and 2 was 40 years, the definition would be changed to 60 years for the K-2 and K-3 plants. (Since Karachi Nuclear Power Plant (Kanupp) has already outlived its ‘lifetime’, the PAEC is carefully reviewing its operation.)

Parvez is also very upbeat about his organisation’s ability to ensure safety and security measures to avert terrorist attacks.

At the time the government had announced its initial plans regarding nuclear plants for Karachi, civil society – led by nuclear physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy – had erupted in protests about the associated risks.

However, Parvez insists that people are exaggerating concerns regarding radioactivity near nuclear power plants. “There is more radioactivity in air flight from Islamabad to Karachi than in living next to a nuclear site,” claims Parvez. “In fact, in the case of Islamabad-Washington flights, it caused radioactivity for more than 20 years.”

The PAEC chairman also maintains the K-2 and K-3 will pose no threat to marine life including fishes and other species. “There will be a limited effect on fish; we’ve already conducted different studies to ensure minimum threat to the marine life.”

Source: http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-3-235039-32-nuclear-plants-to-produce-40,000MW:-PAEC

2-27-2014_11835_1.gif
 
Last edited:

BrotherKantu

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
ہائیڈرو پاور کی طرف توجہ کریں یہ ایٹمی کم خطرناک کم ہے. باز رہنا ہی عقل مندی ہے.

جاپان ختم ہو گیا ہے.
پچیس ہزار سال تک انسان وہاں بس نہیں سکتا .
فوکوشیما دائی ایچی کو کول داؤن کرنے میں چالیس سال لگیں گے بھر اس کی مرمت شورع ہو سکے گی.

 
Last edited:

kakajee

Minister (2k+ posts)
LMAO :D

people rejoicing on this potential suicide disaster. When the world is getting rid of this, Pakistan is adopting it.

Btw, does any one have a figure about the per unit cost of electricity by this?
 

monh zorr

Minister (2k+ posts)
ہائیڈرو پاور کی طرف توجہ کریں یہ ایٹمی کم خطرناک کم ہے. باز رہنا ہی عقل مندی ہے.

جاپان ختم ہو گیا ہے.
پچیس ہزار سال تک انسان وہاں بس نہیں سکتا .
فوکوشیما دائی ایچی کو کول داؤن کرنے میں چالیس سال لگیں گے بھر اس کی مرمت شورع ہو سکے گی.


کوئی پروا نہیں برادر،،
کالا باغ ڈیم بھائی اسفندیار ولی نہیں بننے دیں گے، اسی طرح ہرے،نیلے پیلے ہر قسم کے ڈیموں میں کسی نہ کسی کی زمین، یا ہاری آتے ہیں
کراچی ہے ، اس میں جو اچھا برا چاہو کرلو،
پاکستان میں رہنے والوں کو یقین ہے کہ اگر صرف بجلی کمپنیز کے ملازمین کی غفلت یا تعاون سے ہونے والی چوری روک دی جائے ، توملک میں بجلی کی جائز ضروریات پوری ہوجائینگی
 

BrotherKantu

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Throughout the world nuclear power industry is in crisis (GE is one of them). They need corrupt governments to buy their products and who can beat Nooraas. Pakistani people should stand against this and for the future of their coming generations.
 

monh zorr

Minister (2k+ posts)
O cha gae ho mian g. Allah ap ko 1000 years zindgi da.

ایک ہزار سال میں کیا ہوگا، عثمان بھائی،،
ایک ہزار سال میں تو پانچ فیصد جمع پونجی بھی خرچ نہیں ہوگی۔
پچیس ہزار سال صحیح رہیں گے،،میرے خیال میں
 

Fatema

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Pakistan is full of natural resources why not excavate coals, deserts for solar power, using our rivers to generate hydro power. . The world is getting rid of nuclear energy as its more dangerous then productive. Pakistan can not afford to have one more threat i.e nuclear blast by terrorists. .
 

Admiral

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
LMAO :D

people rejoicing on this potential suicide disaster. When the world is getting rid of this, Pakistan is adopting it.

Btw, does any one have a figure about the per unit cost of electricity by this?


In USA the average cost per KWh = 0.108$ (= Rs. 11/unit), definitely it will be less than this in Pakistan.

The developed world has a
huge share of power generated from nuclear processes. And it is necessary to have this technology, to get rid of the huge petroleum bills for running thermal power plants.

BTW:Which country is getting rid of this methodology except Japan & Germany/UK??
They have solid reasons:
1. Japan => earthquakes are uncontrollable,
2. Germany+UK are gradually shifting to Wind Energy (as they are located on the Wind Corridor of Europe)
.

NPP.png


europe%20nuclear%20power%20share.png



 
Last edited:

Chaudhry_1960

Minister (2k+ posts)
تمام ترقی یافتہ ممالک نیوکلائ بجلی سے جان چھڑانے کی سوچ رہے ہیں اور ہم اس کے پیچھے جا رہے ہیں
 

monh zorr

Minister (2k+ posts)
پاکستان اگرچہ بجلی پیدا کرنے والے تمام عناصر ،پانی،ہوا،کوئلہ، گیس، تیل،،سے مالا مال ملک ہے،مگر احتیاط سے نیوکلیرانرجی پیدا کرنے میں کوئی مضائقہ نہیں۔توجہ احتیاط اور سستی انرجی پر ہونی چاہئے

ہم ایک ترقی پذیر ملک ہیں اور قوم کام نہ ہونے کی وجہ سے مختلف سمتوں میں بکھری ہوئی،پاکستان کے قدرتی وسائل کو بہتر انداز میں استعمال کرنے کیلئے اورقوم کو کسی منزل کی طرف گامزن کرنے کیلئے ، سستی انرجی کی از حد ضرورت ہے

میاں صاحب کی حکومت اگر اس سمت قدم بڑھا رہی ہے تو ملک کی بہت اہم خدمت کررہی ہے
 

OnlyPK

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Civil Nuclear Energy Production is extremely Dangerous. Before my Graduation in Nuclear Applications, I was in the favor of this technology but when I studied the darker side of it, I had to rethink again because it's more Destructive then Productive. (omg)
 

BrotherKantu

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
تمام ترقی یافتہ ممالک نیوکلائ بجلی سے جان چھڑانے کی سوچ رہے ہیں اور ہم اس کے پیچھے جا رہے ہیں

Pakistan is full of natural resources why not excavate coals, deserts for solar power, using our rivers to generate hydro power. . The world is getting rid of nuclear energy as its more dangerous then productive. Pakistan can not afford to have one more threat i.e nuclear blast by terrorists. .

LMAO :D

people rejoicing on this potential suicide disaster. When the world is getting rid of this, Pakistan is adopting it.

Btw, does any one have a figure about the per unit cost of electricity by this?

Civil Nuclear Energy Production is extremely Dangerous. Before my Graduation in Nuclear Applications, I was in the favor of this technology but when I studied the darker side of it, I had to rethink again because it's more Destructive then Productive. (omg)

Yes, be safe than sorry.
 

Admiral

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
@BrotherKantu : Sir jee, we engineers have operated and maintained KANUPP for last 42 years (commissioned 1972) without any accident (:alhamd:), with MINIMUM FINANCIAL RESOURCES, and have made it to the elite 40+ club (USA, Japan, Switzerland, India & Pakistan). Oldest running NPP was commissioned in 1969 in Switzerland.

The engineers who build and maintain these NPPs (sitting in NPP control rooms on the site) are always at the maximum level of risk, yet they know what are they doing, and they dare to keep their lives at risk to provide power to safeguard the industry & economy of their countrymen.

Pakistan has only a small Wind corridor (Arabian Sea), and it is simply insufficient to power the lives of our 200millions.

France is a country whose 66% population supports NPPs, the reasons and scenario is explained here:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/french.html

same is true for Sweden, Finland, Switzerland and Belgium.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top