کیسی فتح کیسا جشن ؟

[FahadBhatti]

Ispr released a victory anthem , lol.
Fck which war have we won?

Our missiles missed all the targets , no significant damages to any of their airbases , no functionality lost and yes we didnt hit and destroy s400. The satellite images of udhampur base shows no real damage.

Where satellite images of noorkhan air base and bhulari airbase show significant damage. India particularly were targeting runways and later satellite images of pakistan bases show craters on runways.

India successfully and accurately hit their targets in pakistan and only ceasefire stopped them otherwise they could have hit more airbase targets easily.

 

[FahadBhatti]

India and Pakistan Talked Big, but Satellite Imagery Shows Limited Damage

While the attacks were widespread, the damage was far more contained than both sides claimed.

www.nytimes.com

 

[ahameed]

India and Pakistan Talked Big, but Satellite Imagery Shows Limited Damage

While the attacks were widespread, the damage was far more contained than both sides claimed.

www.nytimes.com

اس آرٹیکل کی تصویریں شئیر کرسکتے ہیں؟؟؟

 

[chandaa]

Pakistan par qabzaa mazeed mustakham hou gaya hai. Agley 5 saal takk foujiyoon ki mojein he mojein.

 

[Husaink]

Ispr released a victory anthem , lol.
Fck which war have we won?

Our missiles missed all the targets , no significant damages to any of their airbases , no functionality lost and yes we didnt hit and destroy s400. The satellite images of udhampur base shows no real damage.

Where satellite images of noorkhan air base and bhulari airbase show significant damage. India particularly were targeting runways and later satellite images of pakistan bases show craters on runways.

India successfully and accurately hit their targets in pakistan and only ceasefire stopped them otherwise they could have hit more airbase targets easily.

دونوں طرف ہی چھوڑو بیٹھے ہوے ہیں بر صغیر کے لوگوں کا یہی مزاج ہے

 

[Islamabadiya]

lol

Jin say India ke maaa choddeee hay Pak army nain fully backed by Pakistani awaaam

Imrnandoooz ke cheekhain sun kr Mahol dobala hu gaya hay

 

[Eigoroll]

Ispr released a victory anthem , lol.
Fck which war have we won?

Our missiles missed all the targets , no significant damages to any of their airbases , no functionality lost and yes we didnt hit and destroy s400. The satellite images of udhampur base shows no real damage.

Where satellite images of noorkhan air base and bhulari airbase show significant damage. India particularly were targeting runways and later satellite images of pakistan bases show craters on runways.

India successfully and accurately hit their targets in pakistan and only ceasefire stopped them otherwise they could have hit more airbase targets easily.

Absolutely. Pakistan's second-day offensive seems poorly planned and executed — more of an eyewash to defuse public reaction to the continuous Indian drone and missile attacks. The PAF had some initial success in downing Indian jets, but after that, it’s all hot air. As you said, satellite images are telling a completely different story. The destruction of an S-400 isn’t something that could be easily hidden. The international media would’ve definitely picked up on it, especially since it’s a Russian system — and the West would’ve loved to rub that in Russia’s face.

 

[Wicked]

اس آرٹیکل کی تصویریں شئیر کرسکتے ہیں؟؟؟

This site doesnt allow Cut and paste of picture or attachment of PDF.

 

[Wicked]

India and Pakistan Talked Big, but Satellite Imagery Shows Limited Damage​

By Agnes Chang, Pablo Robles and Mujib Mashal

May 14, 2025

• Share full article
• 
  
• 
  
• 293

The four-day military clash between India and Pakistan was the most expansive fighting in half a century between the two nuclear-armed countries. As both sides used drones and missiles to test each other’s air defenses and hit military facilities, they claimed to inflict severe damage.

But satellite imagery indicates that while the attacks were widespread, the damage was far more contained than claimed — and appeared mostly inflicted by India on Pakistani facilities. In a new age of high-tech warfare, strikes by both sides appeared to be precisely targeted.

Indian claimed attacks
Pakistani claimed attacks

China
Afghanistan
KASHMIR

REGION
Islamabad
Pahalgam

Militant attack

on April 22
Nur Khan

air base
Udhampur

air base
Sargodha

air base
Lahore
Pakistan
Rahim Yar

Khan airfield
NEPAL
New Delhi
India
Bholari air base
Gujarat
What is increasingly clear is that both sides suffered casualties among their armed forces, with India acknowledging the loss of five soldiers and Pakistan reporting 11. The heaviest blow to India appears to be the loss of aircraft. While the Indian government has not said how many went down, officials and diplomats say that at least two aircraft were lost, and most likely more.

Where India appears to have had a clear edge is in its targeting of Pakistan’s military facilities and airfields, as the latter stretch of fighting shifted from symbolic strikes and shows of force to attacks on each other’s defense capabilities.

High-resolution satellite imagery, from before and after the strikes, shows clear damage to Pakistan’s facilities by Indian attacks, if limited and precise in nature.

At Bholari air base, located less than 100 miles from the Pakistani port city of Karachi, India’s defense officials said they had struck an aircraft hangar with a precision attack. The visuals showed clear damage to what looks like a hangar.

Before
Kashmir

region
PAK.
INDIA
Aircraft

hangar
Bholari air base
After
Sources: Satellite images by Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs
The Nur Khan air base, within a roughly 15-mile range of both the Pakistani Army’s headquarters and the office of the country’s prime minister and a short distance from the unit that oversees and protects Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, was perhaps the most sensitive military target that India struck.

Nur Khan air base
Kashmir

region
PAK.
INDIA
Before
After
Building

damaged
Sources: Satellite images by Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs
The Indian military said it had particularly targeted the runways and other facilities at some of Pakistan’s key air bases. Satellite images showed the damage. On May 10, Pakistan issued a notice for Rahim Yar Khan air base saying that the runway was not operational.

Kashmir

region
PAK.
INDIA
Rahim Yar

Khan airfield
Crater on

the runway
Sources: Satellite images by Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs
At Sargodha air base, in Punjab Province in Pakistan, the Indian military said it had used precision weapons to strike two sections of the runway.

1
2
Sargodha

air base
Kashmir

region
PAK.
INDIA
1
2
Crater on

the runway
Crater on

the runway
Sources: Satellite images by Maxar Technologies and Planet Labs
Pakistan’s military listed two dozen Indian military installations and bases that it said its forces had targeted. While Indian officials have acknowledged “limited damage” at four air bases, they have offered few details.

Satellite images of the sites Pakistan claimed to have hit are limited, and so far do not clearly show damage caused by Pakistani strikes even at bases where there was corroborating evidence of some military action.

Pakistani officials, according to state media, said their forces had “destroyed” India’s Udhampur air base. The family of one Indian soldier has confirmed his death on the base. But an image from May 12 does not appear to show damage.

Kashmir

region
PAK.
INDIA
Udhampur air base
No significant damage observed
N
Source: Satellite image by Planet Labs
India and Pakistan Talked Big, but Satellite Imagery Shows Limited Damage - The New York Times

 

[Siberite]

Absolutely. Pakistan's second-day offensive seems poorly planned and executed — more of an eyewash to defuse public reaction to the continuous Indian drone and missile attacks. The PAF had some initial success in downing Indian jets, but after that, it’s all hot air. As you said, satellite images are telling a completely different story. The destruction of an S-400 isn’t something that could be easily hidden. The international media would’ve definitely picked up on it, especially since it’s a Russian system — and the West would’ve loved to rub that in Russia’s face.

I think you need to be realistic. As per Indian officials, the number of Missiles they shot at Pakistan were unprecedent. The radar data from PAF chief press conference showed how they were shooting them one after another. Pakistan mostly used soft kill to either divert them or destroy them. As per satellite imaginary, there is some damaged to the Nur Khan air base but that is mostly superficial. One roof top hit was shown from the satellite but that was not even clear what kind of damage it caused. Doesn't look like the roof was caved in either.
The Indian side also didn't show any damage. But remember that Pakistan used FATAH1 missiles, they were short distance but extremely accurate. As far as the S400 battery unit is concerned, they are mobile launch air defense, but they are scattered around different bases in India. Pakistan used CM400 missiles to hit them from JF17. It was only one of such batteries in India. And it is not concentrated in Adampur air base.

We all have seen how Indian media lie. We have heard about their claim of significant damage to the cities, ports and air bases even before the air bases were hit. So, take a chill pill and enjoy more lies and more cries. Pakistan, however, need to ponder a lot as far as their air defenses is concerned. Either steel, borrow or beg and get the latest Chinese air defense batteries to counter the Indian missiles and Israeli built drones. Inda can afford to waste, we can't live to waste.

 

[Kamboz]

I think you need to be realistic. As per Indian officials, the number of Missiles they shot at Pakistan were unprecedent. The radar data from PAF chief press conference showed how they were shooting them one after another. Pakistan mostly used soft kill to either divert them or destroy them. As per satellite imaginary, there is some damaged to the Nur Khan air base but that is mostly superficial. One roof top hit was shown from the satellite but that was not even clear what kind of damage it caused. Doesn't look like the roof was caved in either.
The Indian side also didn't show any damage. But remember that Pakistan used FATAH1 missiles, they were short distance but extremely accurate. As far as the S400 battery unit is concerned, they are mobile launch air defense, but they are scattered around different bases in India. Pakistan used CM400 missiles to hit them from JF17. It was only one of such batteries in India. And it is not concentrated in Adampur air base.

We all have seen how Indian media lie. We have heard about their claim of significant damage to the cities, ports and air bases even before the air bases were hit. So, take a chill pill and enjoy more lies and more cries. Pakistan, however, need to ponder a lot as far as their air defenses is concerned. Either steel, borrow or beg and get the latest Chinese air defense batteries to counter the Indian missiles and Israeli built drones. Inda can afford to waste, we can't live to waste.

I also have same feeling that although we did good on day 1 with the J10C shooting down enemy planes.. but other than that we have 4 days of terror , drones all over the country and all indian missiles hitting thier targets. Meanwhile, the damage caused by our missiles strikes have not been confirmed by any independent source.

 

[Siberite]

I also have same feeling that although we did good on day 1 with the J10C shooting down enemy planes.. but other than that we have 4 days of terror , drones all over the country and all indian missiles hitting thier targets. Meanwhile, the damage caused by our missiles strikes have not been confirmed by any independent source.

I am yet to understand why we let them go at the first strike when they were zooming into our radar and we could kill more than only 6 ... We could have made a real kill.

 

[Mocha7]

I am yet to understand why we let them go at the first strike when they were zooming into our radar and we could kill more than only 6 ... We could have made a real kill.

Jab tak bases pe hamla nahi hua ye ispr wale buzdili se bethe hue newscaster ke tarha khabrein parh rahe the....

Third/fourth day India ne deep inside bases pe hamle shuroo kar diye...

 

[Siberite]

Jab tak bases pe hamla nahi hua ye ispr wale buzdili se bethe hue newscaster ke tarha khabrein parh rahe the....

Third/fourth day India ne deep inside bases pe hamle shuroo kar diye...

Why ?

 

[Wicked]

Could it be that this so-called war was a staged game between Modi and the military establishment? Perhaps the military establishment was given the funding they needed (via IMF and other channels) to keep their operations running. In the meantime, India launches an attack, signaling to the world that there's a new sheriff in South Asia and that no one should mess with India. It would also serve to boost the BJP and Modi’s political standing.
The Pakistani military and establishment have shown time and again that they will go to any lengths to secure what benefits them the most—history speaks for itself. The imprisonment of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the killing of Fatima Ali Jinnah and Liaquat Ali Khan, and countless other true leaders. Then, the brutal slaughter of their own civilians in East Pakistan, the ongoing killings in Balochistan, and the selling and murdering of people in KPK. How many more instances must we count before the world sees the true face of this regime?