That's correct, in fact Dr James Van Allen put forward his theory of radiation belts way before man even entered space. Later man was able to launch probes into space and confirm his theory. And not the other way round.The issue was raised way before the moon landing and research papers were published -- if one may go through the scientific literature..
جاہل حکمران بن چکے ہیں اب ہر طرف جہالت ہی راج کرے گی، جیسے کبھی اسلامی کانفرنس میں جنات کے تھرو بجلی پیدا کرنے کا منصوبہ زیرغور رہا تھاCongrats GuYs!!
Today our Anchors have also become Scientists!! This was one field I think that was not occupied by them before this! ???
جاہل حکمران بن چکے ہیں اب ہر طرف جہالت ہی راج کرے گی، جیسے کبھی اسلامی کانفرنس میں جنات کے تھرو بجلی پیدا کرنے کا منصوبہ زیرغور رہا تھا
Oh God.
So you believe that there is some merit to 'moon landing conspiracy' arguments, and the counter points aren't valid.
Which famous scientist believes so - has he become famous after this belief?!
Sometime ago you were asserting for Illuminati control on Music industry (though that's what 23+% of US youth also believe so - that's sad).
Seems these theories raise their heads after every decade.
Well done. So you are politicizing a specific and well-posed scientific issue.Fact is USA was in cold war with Russia. Do you have any idea how many lies Pakistan has sold to the world and India has? It was a bigger war with two superpowers. US had to establish its dominance.
It's all a streaming pile of bullshit.
Don't tell me you believe in 9/11 too being done by a bunch of Al Qaeda idiots?
You need to stop believing in whatever you and see.
Well done. So you are politicizing a specific and well-posed scientific issue.
Tell me what is your position about the answers to the objections raised by the conspiracy theorists if you have bothered to go through them. I'll not go through that literature because anyone can find those answers if one truly wishes to find the truth. Anyway, good to know what is your position..
About your commentary regarding certain political issues: - perhaps I may partially agree or disagree - but what (even 0.00001%) those political matters have to do with a question about the science and the integrity of three generations of scientists around the world.
Please do not ignore that NASA is a civilian institution and is mandated by law to share all its data and research with the local and international practicing scientists (on demand) .
If a matter regards to DoD/DoE research, one may have argued that they have hidden or falsified data which they have done on some instances. However credibility of NASA is dear to the entire scientific community.
\Don't you know the history of moon landings? Russia was going to do it and USA wanted to. It was the space race
![]()
Space Race - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Watch these videos if you can spare some time. It's not accusations by some conspiracy nut, Buzz aldrin the astronaut himself denied it.
It was a political issue at the time. Ask yourself why haven't they gone again if they could do it back when technology was far behind than it is now?
\
Buzz conversation has been explained what he was talking about. Just listen to his full talk (or even next two sentences) to that 8-year old kid, if you may find. Ironically that conversation was during his book promotion event regarding urging future generation to inhabitable Mars!
Come back to the real issue!
I'm only concerned about the scientific and technical objections raised by the skeptics --- what is your opinion and judgment about he answers to their objections.
NASA visited 6 times and not afterwards citing the costs and returns for the investment - They deem better to spend on a dream to go to mars which at this time seems impossible. (of course many nations are part of this joint effort.). But what that has to do with the skeptic's arguments.
I care zilch about USA and her games.
But I do care about NASA's hundreds of scientists who had allegedly cheated and thousands of scientist around the world who were cheated along with citizens of 100+ other nations, and scores of groups of students and professors in several continents who kept analyzing the data received by probs placed by those (fake) visitors.
The intelligence of world scientific community, honesty of university faculty and integrity of NASA scientists are close to heart. So you cannot brush over the issue narrating tales of politics (which I do know well and you don't need to retell me about if you don't have some opinion or facts about the real issue.
A few days ago you had answered with another video by some preacher kid - I don't indulge in religious discussion due to obvious reasons but I don't learn my religion and politics from youtube kids either. I may reply to that question later as the answer need at least a brief overview of progression of politics , and not just two or three line reply.
So u people trust google? Instead of worlds space labs. Amazing pupils of old agesHahaha Those moon rocks NASA distributed long age were proven to be fake and were taken back by NASA. Try google! ?
Leave Luqmaan aside - A person telling that the death of Diana was an important events in history cannot be taken seriously. He is a bit dumb and a peddler.
But you may make it clear what you wished to say :- Do you assess that the man didn't land on moon?
It is for info only- not to initiate a discussion. I wanted to know your science is as good as your economy and history. I have seen a few equally 'valid' statements about economy and history in the past.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|