وہ ایک واقعہ جس نے جرنیلوں کے احتساب کا دروازہ ہمیشہ کے لئے بند کر دیا

Sohail Shuja

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Unfortunately for the country, the special court's ruling was rendered when Project Imran's hybrid regime was in power. The army chief was declared "Qoum ka baap" by PTI and youthees had their asses jammed by the generals.



بھوسڑی کے الٹے پاجامے ۔ بتا تو ریا ھے تیرا کوکینی درخواست لے کرھائیکورٹ پہنچ گیا تھا کہ جج سیٹھی نے قوم کے ابا کو سر عام لٹکانے کا حکم جاری کرکے پوٹیوں کی صفوں میں ماتم بچھادی ہے ، لہذار کورٹ سے درخواست ھے کہ پوٹیوں کے باپ کو مورد الزام ٹھہرانے والے جج سیٹھی کو عدالت سے بر خواست کیا جائے تاکہ ساری پوٹیوں کو اپنے کھلے ہوئے پاجامے واپس باندھنا نہ پڑیں ۔
اچھا جناب، پی ٹی آئی نے غلط کیا کہ فوج کا ساتھ دیا۔

تو اب اسکا حل کیا ہے؟
کونسا چون لیگ نے پاکستان کو دوبارہ چونا لگانے کے لیئے فوج کا ساتھ دینا چھوڑ دیا؟

مطلب آپ سب کو یہ سمجھانا چاہتے ہیں کہ چونکہ پی ٹی آئی نے ایک غلطی کی تھی، لہٰذا اس کے بعد پی ڈی ایم کا کیا ہوا حلال ہوگیا؟

مجھے آپ کی باتوں کی منطق سمجھ نہیں آتی؟ کیا کرے پی ٹی آئی، فوج کے ساتھ دوبارہ ڈیل کر لے جا کر؟ یہ مشورہ دینا چاہ رہے ہیں؟


تھوڑا اور آگے چلتے ہیں۔ کیا آپ کے خیال میں نون لیگ نے یہ درست مثال قائم کی ہے فوج کو ساتھ ملا کر سیاسی کیس بنانے کی؟

اگر کل کا وقت آج پلٹ کر آگیا ہے تو آج کا وقت بھی آنے والے کل کو لازمی پلٹے گا۔

 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Aaj kal youthees pe generals ke accountability ka khabt sawar hai. However, in the good old days in the "Purana Pakistan", instead of bitching and moaning, the powerful generals were truly put in the accountability noose.

Soon after forming the government after the 2013 elections, then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, of the newly elected government of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), told the lower house of Parliament that their government will file a case under Article 6 of the Constitution to try former military ruler General (retd) Pervez Musharraf.


Former dictator Musharraf to be tried for treason: PM Nawaz Sharif



In his speech on the parliament's floor, Sharif said that by abrogating the Constitution, the former president had committed treason and should be tried under the law.

Pakistan to try former leader Musharraf for treason​

Pakistan’s former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf will face charges of treason, punishable by death, for imposing emergency rule in 2007, the country’s Interior minister said on Sunday.



2535.jpg



The Federation of Pakistan v. General (R) Pervez Musharraf, informally known as the Musharraf high treason case.


General Pervez Musharraf, a four-star general and once-powerful military dictator, was charged under the High Treason Act (Article 6) for subverting and suspending the Constitution.
On November 2013, the Supreme Court, at the request of the government, set up a special court to try Pervez Musharraf under Section 2 of the High Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973.

Moving forward with the case, The special court reserved its decision in the high treason case for November 2019. On December 19, 2019, the special court announced that it would make a decision on the high treason case against Musharraf the same month.

On December 2019, a special court headed by Justice Waqar Seth in a landmark judgment convicted Pervez Musharraf of high treason and sentenced him to death under Article 6 of the Constitution.


Pakistan’s Pervez Musharraf handed death penalty in treason case​



Unfortunately for the country, the special court's ruling was rendered when Project Imran's hybrid regime was in power. The army chief was declared "Qoum ka baap" by PTI and youthees had their asses jammed by the generals.

The hybrid government of Project Imran made a lot of noise about the verdict, responded harshly and declared Justice Waqar Seth, who wrote it, to be mentally unfit. Imran-Bajwa's hybrid government asserted that it would appeal the ruling and file a reference against the judge. A three-judge panel of the Lahore High Court later overruled the special court's ruling. As a result, the door to military generals' accountability was irrevocably sealed.


Mr. Putwarnal Jee don't forget that Zia ul Haq and General Jeelani raised the baby Sharif to become the finance minister of Punjab to the CM and then the PM.
Sharifs are known bootlickers and Nawaz only wanted revenge on General Musharraf as he kicked him out of the premiership and incarcerated him. Sharifs had to make a deal to run away from the country as the coward couldn't face the mosquitoes and the heat of the jail.
Why did the Nawaz government let Musharraf flee the country?
And now again, Nawaz dodged the system and ran away to London.
 

digitalzygot1

Minister (2k+ posts)
Aaj kal youthees pe generals ke accountability ka khabt sawar hai. However, in the good old days in the "Purana Pakistan", instead of bitching and moaning, the powerful generals were truly put in the accountability noose.

Soon after forming the government after the 2013 elections, then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, of the newly elected government of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), told the lower house of Parliament that their government will file a case under Article 6 of the Constitution to try former military ruler General (retd) Pervez Musharraf.


Former dictator Musharraf to be tried for treason: PM Nawaz Sharif



In his speech on the parliament's floor, Sharif said that by abrogating the Constitution, the former president had committed treason and should be tried under the law.

Pakistan to try former leader Musharraf for treason​

Pakistan’s former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf will face charges of treason, punishable by death, for imposing emergency rule in 2007, the country’s Interior minister said on Sunday.



2535.jpg



The Federation of Pakistan v. General (R) Pervez Musharraf, informally known as the Musharraf high treason case.


General Pervez Musharraf, a four-star general and once-powerful military dictator, was charged under the High Treason Act (Article 6) for subverting and suspending the Constitution.
On November 2013, the Supreme Court, at the request of the government, set up a special court to try Pervez Musharraf under Section 2 of the High Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973.

Moving forward with the case, The special court reserved its decision in the high treason case for November 2019. On December 19, 2019, the special court announced that it would make a decision on the high treason case against Musharraf the same month.

On December 2019, a special court headed by Justice Waqar Seth in a landmark judgment convicted Pervez Musharraf of high treason and sentenced him to death under Article 6 of the Constitution.


Pakistan’s Pervez Musharraf handed death penalty in treason case​



Unfortunately for the country, the special court's ruling was rendered when Project Imran's hybrid regime was in power. The army chief was declared "Qoum ka baap" by PTI and youthees had their asses jammed by the generals.

The hybrid government of Project Imran made a lot of noise about the verdict, responded harshly and declared Justice Waqar Seth, who wrote it, to be mentally unfit. Imran-Bajwa's hybrid government asserted that it would appeal the ruling and file a reference against the judge. A three-judge panel of the Lahore High Court later overruled the special court's ruling. As a result, the door to military generals' accountability was irrevocably sealed.


Haha joke of a post. NS haha
 

Husain中川日本

Senator (1k+ posts)
Aaj kal youthees pe generals ke accountability ka khabt sawar hai. However, in the good old days in the "Purana Pakistan", instead of bitching and moaning, the powerful generals were truly put in the accountability noose.

Soon after forming the government after the 2013 elections, then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, of the newly elected government of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), told the lower house of Parliament that their government will file a case under Article 6 of the Constitution to try former military ruler General (retd) Pervez Musharraf.


Former dictator Musharraf to be tried for treason: PM Nawaz Sharif



In his speech on the parliament's floor, Sharif said that by abrogating the Constitution, the former president had committed treason and should be tried under the law.

Pakistan to try former leader Musharraf for treason​

Pakistan’s former military ruler General Pervez Musharraf will face charges of treason, punishable by death, for imposing emergency rule in 2007, the country’s Interior minister said on Sunday.



2535.jpg



The Federation of Pakistan v. General (R) Pervez Musharraf, informally known as the Musharraf high treason case.


General Pervez Musharraf, a four-star general and once-powerful military dictator, was charged under the High Treason Act (Article 6) for subverting and suspending the Constitution.
On November 2013, the Supreme Court, at the request of the government, set up a special court to try Pervez Musharraf under Section 2 of the High Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973.

Moving forward with the case, The special court reserved its decision in the high treason case for November 2019. On December 19, 2019, the special court announced that it would make a decision on the high treason case against Musharraf the same month.

On December 2019, a special court headed by Justice Waqar Seth in a landmark judgment convicted Pervez Musharraf of high treason and sentenced him to death under Article 6 of the Constitution.


Pakistan’s Pervez Musharraf handed death penalty in treason case​



Unfortunately for the country, the special court's ruling was rendered when Project Imran's hybrid regime was in power. The army chief was declared "Qoum ka baap" by PTI and youthees had their asses jammed by the generals.

The hybrid government of Project Imran made a lot of noise about the verdict, responded harshly and declared Justice Waqar Seth, who wrote it, to be mentally unfit. Imran-Bajwa's hybrid government asserted that it would appeal the ruling and file a reference against the judge. A three-judge panel of the Lahore High Court later overruled the special court's ruling. As a result, the door to military generals' accountability was irrevocably sealed.


صرف پرویز مشرف ہی کیوں ؟جیلانی اور ضیاء تیری ماں کے خصم لگتے تھے جو انکا نام لیتے ہوے شرم آتی ہے ، موکا حرامی
 

abdulmajid

Minister (2k+ posts)
Unfortunately for the country, the special court's ruling was rendered when Project Imran's hybrid regime was in power. The army chief was declared "Qoum ka baap" by PTI and youthees had their asses jammed by the generals.
Then N, League voted bajwa extension in assembly😆
 

Siberite

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
اچھا جناب، پی ٹی آئی نے غلط کیا کہ فوج کا ساتھ دیا۔

تو اب اسکا حل کیا ہے؟
کونسا چون لیگ نے پاکستان کو دوبارہ چونا لگانے کے لیئے فوج کا ساتھ دینا چھوڑ دیا؟

مطلب آپ سب کو یہ سمجھانا چاہتے ہیں کہ چونکہ پی ٹی آئی نے ایک غلطی کی تھی، لہٰذا اس کے بعد پی ڈی ایم کا کیا ہوا حلال ہوگیا؟

مجھے آپ کی باتوں کی منطق سمجھ نہیں آتی؟ کیا کرے پی ٹی آئی، فوج کے ساتھ دوبارہ ڈیل کر لے جا کر؟ یہ مشورہ دینا چاہ رہے ہیں؟


تھوڑا اور آگے چلتے ہیں۔ کیا آپ کے خیال میں نون لیگ نے یہ درست مثال قائم کی ہے فوج کو ساتھ ملا کر سیاسی کیس بنانے کی؟

اگر کل کا وقت آج پلٹ کر آگیا ہے تو آج کا وقت بھی آنے والے کل کو لازمی پلٹے گا۔



ھی ھی ھی ۔ لگ ریا اے کھرک آرام نئیں کرنے دے ری ۔

کوکینیا تو یہ کہتا پھر ریا اے کہ باجوہ نے میری الٹی کرکے درواجے کے سامنے لٹکائ ہوئ تھی اور آپے اندر وڑا پکے ام چوپ ریا تھا اسی لیے مجھے احتساب کے کیسوں کا ذمہ دار نہ قرار دو ۔

ہون دس ، ایس بندے نوں پھیر دوبارہ پھڑا دیے تاکہ جیڑی باقی دی رھندی اے اونوں وی کھسوں پائیے ۔

 

ek hindustani

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
بوسڑی کے ، یہ پیالہ مودی کے پچھوڑے میں ڈالنے سے پہلے میری چونی نکال کے ٹافی کھا لینا ۔ اس کا پچھوڑہ چونی کے قابل بھی نہیں ۔
Patwari
Main tujhe Gali deney sey parhez karta hon, sirf madhar chor likhta hoon Chod nahi.
Lekin tu samajhta nahi is baat ko. Tere jaisay logon jey ney khud mulk ko barbaad kiya hai.
 

Siberite

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Patwari
Main tujhe Gali deney sey parhez karta hon, sirf madhar chor likhta hoon Chod nahi.
Lekin tu samajhta nahi is baat ko. Tere jaisay logon jey ney khud mulk ko barbaad kiya hai.


ابے انڈین باسی پاد ۔

یہ بات مودی کو سمجھا ۔ وہ حرامی تیری بنڈ کا پچھواڑہ چھوڑ دے ۔ لیکن توُ پکا چڈی ھے ، وہ تو شاید تیرا پچھوڑا چھوڑ دے ، لیکن توُ نے ھندوں کی چاٹنا نہیں چھوڑنا ۔
 

Sohail Shuja

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)

ھی ھی ھی ۔ لگ ریا اے کھرک آرام نئیں کرنے دے ری ۔

کوکینیا تو یہ کہتا پھر ریا اے کہ باجوہ نے میری الٹی کرکے درواجے کے سامنے لٹکائ ہوئ تھی اور آپے اندر وڑا پکے ام چوپ ریا تھا اسی لیے مجھے احتساب کے کیسوں کا ذمہ دار نہ قرار دو ۔

ہون دس ، ایس بندے نوں پھیر دوبارہ پھڑا دیے تاکہ جیڑی باقی دی رھندی اے اونوں وی کھسوں پائیے ۔

ہا ہا ہا ۔۔۔ یہ تو نے گنجے کی ادھر جوڑنے کی اپنی طرح کی فجول کوشش کی ہے۔ نواجا کہتا تھا کہ ’’مجھے کیوں نکالا؟‘‘اور خود پکے آم چوپتا رہا باجوہ۔ بعد میں خود ہی اسکی ایکسٹنشن کے لیئے ووٹ بھی دیا اور اپنے بیانیئے میں پھر صرف فیض حمید کو رکھا اور باجوے کو غائب کرگیا۔ باجوے کے پھینکے ہوئے چھلکے بھی کھا کر بھی خوش ہے رتب خور۔

خان کی بات کا سیدھا سا لاجک ہے؛ پنامہ کیس کے فیصلے کے وقت کون وزیر اعظم تھا؟
 

Mocha7

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
اچھا جناب، پی ٹی آئی نے غلط کیا کہ فوج کا ساتھ دیا۔

تو اب اسکا حل کیا ہے؟
کونسا چون لیگ نے پاکستان کو دوبارہ چونا لگانے کے لیئے فوج کا ساتھ دینا چھوڑ دیا؟

مطلب آپ سب کو یہ سمجھانا چاہتے ہیں کہ چونکہ پی ٹی آئی نے ایک غلطی کی تھی، لہٰذا اس کے بعد پی ڈی ایم کا کیا ہوا حلال ہوگیا؟

مجھے آپ کی باتوں کی منطق سمجھ نہیں آتی؟ کیا کرے پی ٹی آئی، فوج کے ساتھ دوبارہ ڈیل کر لے جا کر؟ یہ مشورہ دینا چاہ رہے ہیں؟


تھوڑا اور آگے چلتے ہیں۔ کیا آپ کے خیال میں نون لیگ نے یہ درست مثال قائم کی ہے فوج کو ساتھ ملا کر سیاسی کیس بنانے کی؟

اگر کل کا وقت آج پلٹ کر آگیا ہے تو آج کا وقت بھی آنے والے کل کو لازمی پلٹے گا۔

Nowhere have I said that Nawaz Sharif seeks civilian supremacy, Professor. Nawaz Sharif's "vote ko izzat do" narrative has long been shattered, especially since the formation of this government. I've only shared a factual historical account of a military dictator's trial by PMLN.

مجھے آپ کی باتوں کی منطق سمجھ نہیں آتی؟ کیا کرے پی ٹی آئی، فوج کے ساتھ دوبارہ ڈیل کر لے جا کر؟ یہ مشورہ دینا چاہ رہے ہیں؟

The Niazi era was the first hybrid system (v1.0) in history ( where Army Chief was declared "Qoum ka baap") that met a terrible end. The second hybrid system (v 2.0) was that of the Shahbaz government, which sank after swallowing the government's whole vote bank. If Shahbaz Sharif starts declaring today after the dissolution of the government that he is running the movement of civilian supremacy, people will want to punch him in the face too. But, of course, he would never do something like that.

So, what was it that you didn't understand that everyone else did?
 

arifkarim

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
The Niazi era was the first hybrid system (v1.0) in history ( where Army Chief was declared "Qoum ka baap") that met a terrible end.
What's erroneously mentioned in the thread, Bitch, that you keep giving a dislike like a skunk?
What terrible end? Kutti Army whored itself out to US and sent Imran govt packing. If they had done it on their own accord, it was one thing. But they did it on US orders, you fcking bitch slave. They are filthy traitors.
 

Sohail Shuja

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
So, what was it that you didn't understand that everyone else did?
Why your original post only revolved around PTI? Why not the decision of NS of supporting the extension of COAS? and then again, presenting themselves to be part of Hybrid V2.0?

Has PDM not set even worse precedence by colluding with COAS for sending IKs Govt home and delaying elections by refuting the orders of the Supreme Court? do you understand its far reaching consequences in the future of the Country and its democratic discourse?

This is called confirmation bias.

What I do not understand is that why are you only cherry picking on PTI alone and leaving everyone else aside?

What you stated are facts of selective nature, not the truth in its entirety.
 

patwari_sab

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Why your original post only revolved around PTI? Why not the decision of NS of supporting the extension of COAS? and then again, presenting themselves to be part of Hybrid V2.0?

Has PDM not set even worse precedence by colluding with COAS for sending IKs Govt home and delaying elections by refuting the orders of the Supreme Court? do you understand its far reaching consequences in the future of the Country and its democratic discourse?

This is called confirmation bias.

What I do not understand is that why are you only cherry picking on PTI alone and leaving everyone else aside?

What you stated are facts of selective nature, not the truth in its entirety.
Bhai ap patwari ko lecture dena se betr hai ke ap roza rak lo 😉
 

Back
Top