Exactly - SC has effectively thrown the Vote of No Confidence out of constitution.I don't agree with this decision that the votes of those who voted or will vote against the party line should not be counted. If this is the case, what is the use of No confident vote ? If court wanted to make this decision , then they should have also either abolish the vote of no confident or amend the Vote of no confident resolution .
This will only embolden future civilian dictators to do whatever they like to do ,after having no fear of vote of confident .
Go for Presidential systemI don't agree with this decision that the votes of those who voted or will vote against the party line should not be counted. If this is the case, what is the use of No confident vote ? If court wanted to make this decision , then they should have also either abolish the vote of no confident or amend the Vote of no confident resolution .
This will only embolden future civilian dictators to do whatever they like to do ,after having no fear of vote of confident .
Why ? Jump from frypan to the fire.Go for Presidential system
It works for USA and best for Pakistan. Before commenting, study the American Presidential system.Why ?
Presidential system is a paradise for dictators. A forever green for our Military Generals .It works for USA and best for Pakistan. Before commenting, study the American Presidential system.
Why do you forget other parties?I don't agree with this decision that the votes of those who voted or will vote against the party line should not be counted. If this is the case, what is the use of No confident vote ? If court wanted to make this decision , then they should have also either abolish the vote of no confident or amend the Vote of no confident resolution .
This will only embolden future civilian dictators to do whatever they like to do ,after having no fear of vote of confident .
Give power to city Governments. No COAS position. Make hiring and firing for an employee simple.Presidential system is a paradise for dictators. A forever green for our Military Generals .
If the parties can't exercise their command on their members , they have no right to rule over the nation . It is mostly damaging to those parties who form Government by gathering turncoats and those who are not really sincere with their mission .Why do you forget other parties?
Why do you forget party policy?
That is another subject. We are talking about federal level governance.Give power to city Governments. No COAS position. Make hiring and firing for an employee simple.
Other party also use no confident voteI don't agree with this decision that the votes of those who voted or will vote against the party line should not be counted. If this is the case, what is the use of No confident vote ? If court wanted to make this decision , then they should have also either abolish the vote of no confident or amend the Vote of no confident resolution .
This will only embolden future civilian dictators to do whatever they like to do ,after having no fear of vote of confident .
Exactly - SC has effectively thrown the Vote of No Confidence out of constitution.
I wish PML-N will wake up and realise what damage this view of supreme court caused to the constitution of Pakistan.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|