You are leading them in wrong direction because of your flawed methodologies.
So answer two questions for me:
1. How do you eliminate very other possibility if you do not know all the possibilities?
2. If you do know all the possibilities then how? Are you omniscient?
Dear vitamin c, I am not misleading anyone but helping people become aware of major flaws in your way of looking at things in comparison to my way of looking at things. That is all there is to it. I am trying to make people become aware of the fact that going about life the way you explain it, is a waste of their time and energy because that way of looking at things leads no where at all. Had it then so far we will have reached some worthy end or conclusion but we have not because it is an open ended situation you are calling or inviting everyone to. This is why I already explained for you that an open ended explanation is no explanation at all for us human beings because we are not in a position to postpone or suspend our necessary decisions on that basis.
Life decisions need to be made regardless at whatever stage of our life we are. So we are better off following sensible traditions or creating sensible tradition rather than following an unending path or a path that goes no where ie a dead end and so become bewildered or totally confused or fully trapped. My way of looking at things helps them make decisions that need to be made and carry on living and keep making progress and be prosperous. In no way I am telling people to close their minds but instead I am hoping they will keep their minds open and carry on with their searches or explorations for yet better knowledge of things.
As for your question, how I eliminate possibilities. It is done by scientists to solve their problems, It is done by police in solving its cases, it is done by courts for solving their cases, it is done by doctors to solve their cases, it is done by engineers to solved their problems, it is done by ourselves every day etc etc. In practical life in all such matters where this method is applicable it is used successfully and so life carries on. For example, a person has to cook a meal so one makes decision by using process of elimination. One looks at what is available and what is not available. What sort of meal was cooked before and would it be good idea to do the same again or not, does a person like a particular meal or not etc etc. Each and every decision we make does have elements that need to be eliminated to arrive at the final decision about something. This is how fallacies need to be defined and applied not your way which in our case are impractical altogether.
It seems to me your whole argument about God and revelation of God rests upon the point that first we must know God for sure and then accept anything about God from God. You fail to explain how that is even possible for us to do so without getting in the argument the revelation of God. This is why atheists dismiss the God argument based upon revelation as circular argument. My point here is that it is not a circular argument because the revelation itself points out evidences and puts forth explanations and on that basis proves what it claims about. It will be a circular argument if the revelation just claimed existence of God and did not point out or put forth any evidences or explanations for its claims about God. This is why I say you want to go about issues the long way or the impossible way which is the exact opposite of process of elimination method because elimination method is quick and short way for reaching a conclusion.
You simply want to avoid studying the quran as evidence and proof for everything God related. You do not want to know how the quran and the existing creation together can prove existence of God beyond any reasonable doubt. On the other hand I am saying, this is the way God has chosen to express himself so let us check it out. What is wrong with that? Absolutely nothing at all because all we want to know is if there is a God or not and if there is one what he wants from us human beings. All we need to see is, does all this somehow fit together properly or not and the issue could be decided that way fully and for good.
You on the other hand with all your scientist and philosopher friends can never reach a conclusion about God ever no matter whatever your explanations are about it. It is because had God created us to search out God all by ourselves then he needed to give us much more abilities than the ones we already have been given. Because they are not enough for going about this issue that way. You need to become aware of the fact that we humans can never use any way or method or technique or formula which is impossible for us to use or the way it is impossible for to use and this is the error you are committing by applying wrong definitions to things or by applying them wrongly.
As I already explained for you repeatedly that if you will take the very long routes or the impossible routes for solving our facing problems which need immediate solutions then what is the point of such exercises? To me solving the problem of proper way of life for humanity is of utmost vital importance because look at what is going on in the human world worldwide. So we cannot afford to carry on living like this and look for things about which we are not at all sure and can never be sure going about them your way.
Here is my question for you to answer, what do you think way of life is or what it has to be about and why it is of such vital importance to God that he had to reveal his book for us?
Moreover I asked you to educate us about what human language is, where it has come from or how it evolved or developed or was used or is used today? Where did we get words from and where did their meanings come from or what processes or mechanisms are involved in all this? I am asking this question of you because you seem to be an expert on the quranic text. You claim all sorts of things about it. So I want to know what do you know about all these things that I am asking you about.
regards and all the best.