Already have Cowboy. As mentioned and proved there is no explanation, deen or fiqh to be found in hadith, which at best is a very crude and mostly unrealizable record of early Islamic history majority of it based on single person alleged testimonies. Allah's book is not dependent on uncredible stories to "explain it" by peoples even whose real names also you don't. Abu Hurairah for example. Narrator of the most hadith ever, spent the least time with the Prophet from all the know sahabas and you don't even know his real name but worship his hadiths! lol
As for your question,
I've already said I'll be glad to answer it and more, once you've answered my pending questions from previous thread.
I'll be a sweet heart and post them again for the second time to re-jog your memory one more them
1. Have you even read a single collection from the "saha satta"
2.Will you drink from a bucket of Milk if its been contaminated with just a single drop of urine. If not then why do you follow your hadith when it is littered with 100s if not 1000s of fabricated hadith as classified by your own moulvis.
3. Why even if so many hadith have been classified as fake and fabrications, why are they are still printed and published today with the classification of Sahih and called the most authentic after the Quran and still considered the part of the Siha Sitta
4. Quote one hadith out of the claimed "many hadith" "clearly" mentioning how to pray.
So ball is in your court if you want answers, you'll have to give a few first. I know you won't simply because you can't.
I know you aren't majority of you aren't because that just exposes your lack of even basic knowledge about them as well break those high pedestals you have placed them on as more and more truth and facts about them get revealed.
So what will it be my Ozzy friend, more temper tantrums, whataboutery, diversionary tactics, moving the goal posts, red herrings, strawmen or some real discussion.