I agree with your principle (in principle ha!).
But would just add that till Musharraf sudden capitulation and onslaught of Pr Mush media voices , AQ Khan was given highest honors by the state. He was treated by public at large as hero.(Still is by vast majority)
The revocation of the status was not a spontaneous. Rather done explicitly to justify Musharaf action against AQ khan.
Which included a spurious forced admission of "guilt" in national media, years of house arrest and media black out.
If he demands gratitude now its only because he was so unfairly treated by a dictator and his goons.
In fact most of Mush lies are faithfully reproduced by a certain segment of the self flagellating English speaking press.
Also overall he has grown disillusioned with Pakistan and how it has turned out (after 2001 WoT period).
I can t blame him
No quoting someone who is so clearly partisan and conspiracy prone is lol worthy.
He simply isnt a serious academic.
To be frank he is a conspiracy theorist who cherry picks unsubstantiated "facts" to arrive at laughable premises.
(Like the time he claimed Zia was murdered by Shia extremists lol)
I would suggest reading from neutral sources to arrive at a more balanced position.
I mean there is alot of academic material available on this subject.
(Like for example this excellent primer commissioned by Green peace that details AQ Khan European supplier network:
www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications/reports/a-q-khan-urenco-and-the-prol/)
And Caught by whom?
What an odd notion.
Pakistan was never a signatory of NPT or CTBT.
Since 70's Pakistan has made it clear it will develop Nuclear weapons no matter what the cost,consequences or means.
Thanks to AQ Khan it was possible.
If Musharraf made him the fall guy to wash our establishment "sins",Its more a reflection of Musharraf spinelessness then anything else.
Commando was (as usual) pressured to take an absurd position. Pretend Military had no idea of its own Nuclear/Missile programme.
Its sad people are still humouring this absurd notion.
Show some intellectual honesty for god sakes.
Dont let hoarse faux outrage and facile "condemnations" from powers that never wanted Pakistan to go nuclear define the parameters of your understanding.
Commando humiliated a national hero who did sooo much single-handedly just to get Armitage not to breathe down his neck.
I mean that inexcusable and ppl who still push the laughable Mush position in the media on this issue can only be motivated by a hatred towards this country.
(Same sources that dont have anything to say about Israel helping the South African Apartheid regime develop a Nuclear weapons programme.
Infact same clowns who till this day pretend Israel does not even have one.)
AQ Khan managed to evade strict Anti proliferation measures and intense scrutiny.
He was never "caught" by the many forces that never wanted to see Pakistan go nuclear.
He was rather "Caught" by spineless beghariat uniformed traitor Gen Mushrraf and a ********* muft khor treacherous shameless military establishment which has surrendered any self respect or notion of sovereignty ages ago.
Sure AQ Khan boasted about his accomplishments. Rightly so. But if you live in the real world and not some Khaled Ahmed alternate reality you would know such "veiled: boasts were routine from other leaders such as Zia, Bhutto, Benazir, GIK.
Some times this sort of public signalling had to do with increased tensions with India.
AQ Khan did not reveal anything which wasn't extensively known from atleast the 80's.
Numerous press reports had already covered his network.
Especially since there were major cases in courts in Belgiam and Canada thorugh out 80s related to this work.
(Incidentally AQ khan managed to win most of these cases or get acquited from them. Another testament to his sheer brilliance in this regard )
And on Bhutto of course he gets credit for starting the programme.
AQ Khan has repeatedly said how ZAB responded to his letter to him and saw the incompetence of the PAEC clowns who were wasting his time.
At same time also worth acknowledging (as you do in a way) Zia ul Haq under whom the bulk of the work towards a Nuclear weapon was done.
Also his ability to frustrate western attempts to stop the programme.
The notion US "Allowed" Pakistan to have a weapon is also rather silly.
It did no such thing. It simply did not have an option in the matter. Its intelligence was incomplete.
Zia was able to diffuse its diplomatic pressure repeatedly by obfuscation, redirection and some quite brilliant manoeuvring.
(National Security Archive had a very intresting set of document on this aspect)
1 www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nukevault/ebb333/
2 www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB114/
3 www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB6/
In Summary for the love of God stop reading this nauseating revisionist crap DT,FT,Dawn,News week produces.
Outside Pakistan self flagellating lot (and India) no one takes these ridiculous revisionist accounts by Pervaiz Hoodbhoy,Khaled Ahmed, Samar Joker Mubarak mand & other assorted PAEC good for nothing seriously.