Meray Mutabiq
Voter (50+ posts)
Last edited by a moderator:
Meray Mutabiq with Sohail Waraich - 21st Jan 2011
- Thread starter Meray Mutabiq
- Start date
younus
Senator (1k+ posts)
suhail ahmad presented why establishment may like IK in very well manners... in fact, if we broaden what he said, that is the reason everyone in pakistan now wants to see IK in power. like every patriotic pakistani, establishment may have favorism for IK which is not bad...
Last edited:
badkismati ? He was elected unanimouly by all provincial and federal parliments and senete. All political parties voted for him including PMLN
You call it badkismati, others call it democracy.
I call it self destructive people.
how sohail says that Aitezaz never appeared before supereme court after restoration.
I found this article in dawn archieves:
"Just to recall and set the record straight, while Aitzaz Ahsan was arguing for action against President Musharrafs immunity claims under Article 248 of the Constitution, he had viewed before the Supreme Court that if Hazrat Umar (RA) could be questioned about his Abaya (long shirt), why could not President Musharraf be held accountable?
(Reference: Ansar Abbasis report appearing in The News International on February 2, 2010)
Aitzaz, who has now seemingly taken a U-turn in President Zardaris immunity issue, was basically asked by Justice Nawaz Abbasi (who later took oath under Musharrafs PCO) that if Article 2(A) was read with Article 248 of the Constitution, how it would impact the president.
The News International, in its afore-mentioned report, had also quoted Barrister Aitzaz Ahsans few more viewpoints and logic against President Musharrafs immunity claims during the same hearing.
Aitzaz had stated during the hearing: According to Article 248, the President and Governor could not be made party in criminal cases, they could not be arrested; but if any of their acts are contrary to the law, they have no protection under Article 248 of the Constitution. They enjoy no immunity in this case.
I found this article in dawn archieves:
"Just to recall and set the record straight, while Aitzaz Ahsan was arguing for action against President Musharrafs immunity claims under Article 248 of the Constitution, he had viewed before the Supreme Court that if Hazrat Umar (RA) could be questioned about his Abaya (long shirt), why could not President Musharraf be held accountable?
(Reference: Ansar Abbasis report appearing in The News International on February 2, 2010)
Aitzaz, who has now seemingly taken a U-turn in President Zardaris immunity issue, was basically asked by Justice Nawaz Abbasi (who later took oath under Musharrafs PCO) that if Article 2(A) was read with Article 248 of the Constitution, how it would impact the president.
The News International, in its afore-mentioned report, had also quoted Barrister Aitzaz Ahsans few more viewpoints and logic against President Musharrafs immunity claims during the same hearing.
Aitzaz had stated during the hearing: According to Article 248, the President and Governor could not be made party in criminal cases, they could not be arrested; but if any of their acts are contrary to the law, they have no protection under Article 248 of the Constitution. They enjoy no immunity in this case.
