Sorry to say! Dr. Tahir ul Qadri may yehi kamzori hay k wo apni baat, apnay topic ko solid tariqay say define nahi kartay.
Ab, is saari speach may wo pehlay k nabio ka zikar to kartay rahay or apni kahaniaan sunatay rahay lekin koi esi solid or clear ayat nahi batai jis say ye sabit ho k Hazoor S.A.W Allah k aakhri nabi hain or jab kuch ayat inho nay quote ki bhi to without translation. Is ka matlab hay k ye awam ko bewaqoof bana rahay hain or gol mol baat kar rahay hain. kun k inho nay koi esi ayat nahi sunai jis say ye clearly proof ho k aap S.A.W k baad koi nabi nai aye ga...... halankay I know, there are lots of proof and ayah and hadiths but he doesn't mentioned.
One thing, which is more important which I want to say " I know, and I believe that There is NO DOUBT ABOUT HAZRAT MUHAMMAD S.A.W. IS THE LAST NABI AND THERE IS NO NABI/PAIGHAMBER/RASOOL AFTER HIM". But if Dr. is talking about a specific topic, he should proof it solidly by "Ayat" or by any "Hadith". He is just talking about his own point of views but not menssioning any "CLEAR AYAT OR HADITH".
Thats why I don't accept him as a scholor or Allama. He is just storys speacher and nothing else. I ever saw his speaches, he just say stories of "flaan flaan" but don't talk on "Ayat / Soorah or Hadith".
Scholar must b clear their point of views with solid and clear prooves of "Ayat or/and Hadith".
like this video. Dr. Zakir Naik is proofing in his speach. see 1st quote of "Soorah Al Ahzaab, Ayat No 40". This called the proof.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eL0wSgEmN8[/video]
This is my observation and point of view. Its not necessory either u agree with me or not.